Specifications Compared
| Spec | RTX-A4000 | TITAN-V |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 140W | 250W |
| VRAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| CUDA Cores | 6,144 | 5,120 |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Volta |
| Form Factors | PCIe | PCIe |
| Interconnect | ||
| Tensor Cores | 192 | 640 |
| FP16 Performance | 19.2 TFLOPS | 13.8 TFLOPS |
| FP32 Performance | 19.2 TFLOPS | 13.8 TFLOPS |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 653 GB/s |
Performance Analysis
Compute performance favors the RTX A4500 decisively: its 23.1 TFLOPS in FP16 and FP32 exceeds the TITAN V's 13.8 TFLOPS by 67 percent, speeding up model training and inference in deep learning pipelines. The matched FP16 and FP32 rates on both GPUs support standard precision workflows, but Ampere architecture advances enable better tensor core utilization for mixed-precision tasks on the RTX A4500.
Memory configurations reveal trade-offs. The RTX A4500 provides 20 GB GDDR6 with 640 GB/s bandwidth, accommodating larger batch sizes and models than the TITAN V's 12 GB HBM2 despite the latter's slight 653 GB/s edge. Higher VRAM on the RTX A4500 proves critical for contemporary large language models, while TITAN V bandwidth aids latency-sensitive simulations.
Live Cloud Pricing
Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.
RTX A4500
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 TensorDock | NVIDIA RTX A4000 16GB VRAM | 16GB | 0 vCPU 0GB RAM | Tallinn, Harjumaa | $0.08/GPU/hr | Available | ||
 Vast.ai | 8×NVIDIA RTX A4000 16GB VRAM | 16GB | 80 vCPU 201GB RAM 1698GB Storage | United Kingdom | $0.15/GPU/hr $1.17/hr total (8×) | Available | ||
 Hyperstack | 4×NVIDIA RTX A4000 16GB VRAM | 16GB | 16 vCPU 86GB RAM 500GB Storage | Norway | $0.15/GPU/hr $0.60/hr total (4×) | Available | ||
Hyperstack | 2×NVIDIA RTX A4000 16GB VRAM | 16GB | 8 vCPU 43GB RAM 200GB Storage | Norway | $0.15/GPU/hr $0.30/hr total (2×) | Available | ||
Hyperstack | NVIDIA RTX A4000 16GB VRAM | 16GB | 4 vCPU 21GB RAM 100GB Storage | Norway | $0.15/GPU/hr | Available |
When to Choose the RTX A4500
Opt for the RTX A4500 in cloud-based AI development where availability and cost matter. Pricing from $0.10 per hour across four offers enables scalable experimentation without hardware ownership. Its 20 GB VRAM and 23.1 TFLOPS handle modern LLMs and fine-tuning effectively.
Power efficiency at 200 W TDP suits multi-GPU clusters better than the TITAN V's 250 W draw.
When to Choose the TITAN V
Select the TITAN V for on-premises setups emphasizing memory bandwidth. Its 653 GB/s surpasses the RTX A4500's 640 GB/s, benefiting high-throughput scientific computing or graphics rendering with large datasets. HBM2's low latency complements bandwidth-intensive tasks where VRAM limits are not binding.
Use Cases
RTX A4500's 20 GB VRAM supports larger models than TITAN V's 12 GB. Its 23.1 TFLOPS accelerates training cycles.
Higher 23.1 TFLOPS on RTX A4500 reduces latency for real-time inference. Cloud pricing at $0.10 per hour aids deployment.
20 GB VRAM handles parameter-heavy fine-tuning on RTX A4500. Ampere efficiency outperforms Volta's 13.8 TFLOPS.
RTX A4500's modern Ampere cores optimize diffusion model generation. 640 GB/s bandwidth matches workload demands.
TITAN V's 653 GB/s bandwidth excels in bandwidth-bound simulations. HBM2 suits precise numerical computations.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which GPU has more VRAM: RTX A4500 or TITAN V?▾
The RTX A4500 offers 20 GB GDDR6 VRAM, exceeding the TITAN V's 12 GB HBM2. This advantage supports larger AI models and bigger batches. Bandwidth remains competitive at 640 GB/s for RTX A4500 versus 653 GB/s.
Is the RTX A4500 faster than the TITAN V?▾
Yes, RTX A4500 achieves 23.1 TFLOPS in FP16 and FP32, a 67 percent gain over TITAN V's 13.8 TFLOPS. This boosts training and inference speeds. Architecture improvements further enhance real-world performance.
What is the cloud pricing for these GPUs?▾
RTX A4500 pricing starts at $0.10 per hour, averaging $0.19 per hour across four offers. TITAN V has no live cloud offers available. This makes RTX A4500 far more accessible for rentals.
Which GPU uses less power?▾
RTX A4500 has a 200 W TDP, lower than TITAN V's 250 W. This efficiency aids dense server deployments. Performance per watt favors the newer Ampere design.
Can these GPUs be used interchangeably for ML?▾
RTX A4500 suits most ML due to 20 GB VRAM and 23.1 TFLOPS. TITAN V fits legacy Volta-optimized code with 653 GB/s bandwidth. PCIe compatibility allows swaps, but software support varies.
What architecture do they use?▾
RTX A4500 uses Ampere from 2021 with advanced tensor cores. TITAN V relies on Volta from 2017. The generational gap impacts features like sparsity support.
Which is cheaper to rent, the RTX A4000 or the TITAN V?▾
Cloud rental prices for both the RTX A4000 and TITAN V vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.
How much VRAM does the RTX A4000 have compared to the TITAN V?▾
The RTX A4000 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. The TITAN V has 12 GB of HBM2 memory.
Can I find RTX A4000 and TITAN V GPUs available to rent right now?▾
Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.
What is the main difference between the RTX A4000 and the TITAN V?▾
The RTX A4000 uses the Ampere architecture (2021) while the TITAN V uses Volta (2017). The RTX A4000 delivers 1.4x the FP16 throughput and 1.5x the memory bandwidth of the TITAN V.