Specifications Compared
| Spec | RTX-A4000 | TITAN-V |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 140W | 250W |
| VRAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| CUDA Cores | 6,144 | 5,120 |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Volta |
| Form Factors | PCIe | PCIe |
| Interconnect | ||
| Tensor Cores | 192 | 640 |
| FP16 Performance | 19.2 TFLOPS | 13.8 TFLOPS |
| FP32 Performance | 19.2 TFLOPS | 13.8 TFLOPS |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 653 GB/s |
Performance Analysis
Compute performance favors the RTX A4000 with 19.2 TFLOPS in FP16 and FP32, exceeding the TITAN V's 13.8 TFLOPS: this translates to faster model training and inference, especially in mixed-precision workflows where tensor cores shine without FP32 bottlenecks. The Ampere architecture's optimizations further accelerate real-world deep learning by 39 percent in raw throughput over Volta.
Memory bandwidth gives the TITAN V an advantage at 653 GB/s versus the A4000's 448 GB/s, enabling larger batch sizes in bandwidth-limited scenarios like high-resolution simulations or certain inference pipelines. However, the A4000's 16 GB VRAM surpasses the TITAN V's 12 GB, supporting bigger models or datasets without swapping. Power efficiency at 140W for the A4000 allows sustained performance in multi-GPU clusters, unlike the TITAN V's 250W draw which limits density.
Overall, the A4000 suits memory-intensive training, while the TITAN V excels in bandwidth-bound tasks if accessible.
Live Cloud Pricing
Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.
RTX A4000
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 TensorDock | NVIDIA RTX A4000 16GB VRAM | 16GB | 0 vCPU 0GB RAM | Tallinn, Harjumaa | $0.08/GPU/hr | Available | ||
 Vast.ai | 8×NVIDIA RTX A4000 16GB VRAM | 16GB | 80 vCPU 201GB RAM 1698GB Storage | United Kingdom | $0.15/GPU/hr $1.17/hr total (8×) | Available | ||
 Hyperstack | 4×NVIDIA RTX A4000 16GB VRAM | 16GB | 16 vCPU 86GB RAM 500GB Storage | Norway | $0.15/GPU/hr $0.60/hr total (4×) | Available | ||
Hyperstack | 2×NVIDIA RTX A4000 16GB VRAM | 16GB | 8 vCPU 43GB RAM 200GB Storage | Norway | $0.15/GPU/hr $0.30/hr total (2×) | Available | ||
Hyperstack | NVIDIA RTX A4000 16GB VRAM | 16GB | 4 vCPU 21GB RAM 100GB Storage | Norway | $0.15/GPU/hr | Available |
When to Choose the RTX A4000
The RTX A4000 stands out for machine learning training and inference requiring ample VRAM: its 16 GB GDDR6 handles larger models than the TITAN V's 12 GB HBM2. Availability across 28 cloud providers at an average $0.31 per hour, starting from $0.08 per hour, ensures easy access. Lower 140W TDP supports efficient deployments in cost-sensitive environments.
Modern workloads benefit from Ampere's 19.2 TFLOPS FP16/FP32 performance, outpacing Volta by 39 percent.
When to Choose the TITAN V
The TITAN V fits bandwidth-critical applications like scientific computing or high-throughput simulations: its 653 GB/s HBM2 bandwidth exceeds the A4000's 448 GB/s, permitting larger batch sizes. HBM2's low latency aids memory-bound tasks where raw speed trumps capacity.
Legacy setups with on-premises TITAN V hardware may prefer it over cloud-only A4000 options, despite 250W TDP and absence of live rentals.
Use Cases
RTX A4000's 16 GB VRAM and 19.2 TFLOPS FP16 performance support larger models and faster training than TITAN V's 12 GB and 13.8 TFLOPS.
Higher 19.2 TFLOPS throughput and availability from $0.08 per hour make A4000 ideal for scalable inference, surpassing TITAN V's specs.
A4000's extra 4 GB VRAM handles fine-tuning datasets better, with 140W TDP enabling dense clusters unlike TITAN V's 250W.
Ampere architecture and 19.2 TFLOPS accelerate diffusion models more efficiently than Volta's 13.8 TFLOPS.
TITAN V's 653 GB/s bandwidth supports memory-intensive simulations better than A4000's 448 GB/s.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which GPU has more VRAM, RTX A4000 or TITAN V?▾
The RTX A4000 provides 16 GB GDDR6 VRAM, exceeding the TITAN V's 12 GB HBM2. This aids larger models in training. Bandwidth differs at 448 GB/s for A4000 versus 653 GB/s for TITAN V.
What is the performance difference in TFLOPS?▾
RTX A4000 delivers 19.2 TFLOPS in FP16 and FP32, 39 percent above TITAN V's 13.8 TFLOPS. This boosts ML workloads. Architectures are Ampere 2021 versus Volta 2017.
Which has lower power consumption?▾
RTX A4000 uses 140W TDP, half of TITAN V's 250W. This favors cloud and multi-GPU setups. Efficiency stems from newer Ampere design.
Is TITAN V available on cloud GPU rentals?▾
TITAN V has no live cloud offers currently. RTX A4000 averages $0.31 per hour across 28 providers, starting at $0.08 per hour.
Which GPU has higher memory bandwidth?▾
TITAN V offers 653 GB/s with HBM2, surpassing RTX A4000's 448 GB/s GDDR6. This benefits bandwidth-bound tasks. VRAM capacity favors A4000 at 16 GB.
What architectures do they use?▾
RTX A4000 uses Ampere from 2021; TITAN V uses Volta from 2017. A4000 provides higher 19.2 TFLOPS overall.
Which is cheaper to rent, the RTX A4000 or the TITAN V?▾
Cloud rental prices for both the RTX A4000 and TITAN V vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.
How much VRAM does the RTX A4000 have compared to the TITAN V?▾
The RTX A4000 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. The TITAN V has 12 GB of HBM2 memory.
Can I find RTX A4000 and TITAN V GPUs available to rent right now?▾
Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.
What is the main difference between the RTX A4000 and the TITAN V?▾
The RTX A4000 uses the Ampere architecture (2021) while the TITAN V uses Volta (2017). The RTX A4000 delivers 1.4x the FP16 throughput and 1.5x the memory bandwidth of the TITAN V.