Specifications Compared
| Spec | RTX-4070 | RTX-A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 300W |
| VRAM | 12 GB | 48 GB |
| CUDA Cores | 5,888 | 10,752 |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Form Factors | PCIe | PCIe |
| Interconnect | NVLink | |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 336 |
| FP16 Performance | 29.1 TFLOPS | 38.7 TFLOPS |
| FP32 Performance | 29.1 TFLOPS | 38.7 TFLOPS |
| INT8 Performance | 466 TOPS | |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 768 GB/s |
Performance Analysis
The RTX A6000 delivers higher peak performance at 38.7 TFLOPS for FP16 and FP32 versus the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 29.1 TFLOPS: this advantage accelerates deep learning training cycles and inference throughput, particularly for models optimized in half-precision. The Ada Lovelace design of the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER enhances efficiency with modern tensor cores and a lower 200 W TDP compared to 300 W, yielding better performance per watt in sustained workloads. Memory specs define key limits: the RTX A6000's 48 GB VRAM and 768 GB/s bandwidth enable larger batch sizes in training large language models, reducing out-of-memory errors, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 12 GB and 504 GB/s constrain it to smaller batches or quantized models. In inference scenarios, higher bandwidth on the RTX A6000 minimizes latency for data transfers, but the newer architecture narrows the gap through optimized scheduling.
Live Cloud Pricing
Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() RunPod | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB VRAM | 12GB | 6 vCPU 30GB RAM | 🌍global | $0.50/GPU/hr |
RTX A6000
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() TensorDock | NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB VRAM | 48GB | 0 vCPU 0GB RAM | Chubbuck, Idaho | $0.40/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() RunPod | NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB VRAM | 48GB | 9 vCPU 50GB RAM | 🌍global | $0.49/GPU/hr | |||
![]() Hyperstack | NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB VRAM | 48GB | 28 vCPU 58GB RAM 100GB Storage | Canada | $0.50/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Hyperstack | 2×NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB VRAM | 48GB | 60 vCPU 116GB RAM 300GB Storage | Canada | $0.50/GPU/hr $1.00/hr total (2×) | Available | ||
![]() Massed Compute | NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB VRAM | 48GB | 6 vCPU 32GB RAM 256GB Storage | Iowa | $0.55/GPU/hr | Available |
When to Choose the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER excels in cost-sensitive environments requiring modern architecture: its $0.09 per hour starting price and 200 W TDP make it ideal for prototyping, Stable Diffusion image generation, or inference on models fitting within 12 GB VRAM. Users benefit from Ada Lovelace efficiencies in single-GPU setups without NVLink needs.
When to Choose the RTX A6000
The RTX A6000 is preferable for memory-intensive professional workloads: 48 GB VRAM and 768 GB/s bandwidth support training or fine-tuning large models with batch sizes infeasible on 12 GB GPUs. NVLink enables multi-GPU configurations for scaled scientific computing or enterprise inference.
Use Cases
The RTX A6000's 48 GB VRAM and 768 GB/s bandwidth handle large batch sizes for training massive models, unlike the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 12 GB limit.
The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's $0.09 per hour pricing and 29.1 TFLOPS suffice for quantized models within 12 GB VRAM, offering cost savings over the RTX A6000.
48 GB VRAM on the RTX A6000 supports larger datasets and batches during fine-tuning, with 38.7 TFLOPS accelerating iterations.
12 GB GDDR6X VRAM and 504 GB/s bandwidth on the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER meet image generation needs efficiently at lower 200 W TDP and cost.
NVLink interconnect and 48 GB VRAM enable multi-GPU simulations on the RTX A6000, surpassing the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's single PCIe setup.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which GPU has more VRAM?▾
The RTX A6000 offers 48 GB GDDR6 VRAM, far exceeding the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 12 GB GDDR6X. This makes the RTX A6000 better for large models.
What are the TFLOPS ratings?▾
The RTX A6000 provides 38.7 TFLOPS in FP16 and FP32, compared to 29.1 TFLOPS on the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. Higher TFLOPS favor compute-heavy tasks.
How do prices compare in the cloud?▾
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER starts at $0.09 per hour (average $0.17 per hour) across two offers, while RTX A6000 starts at $0.17 per hour (average $1.05 per hour) across 59 offers.
Which has higher memory bandwidth?▾
The RTX A6000 achieves 768 GB/s bandwidth with GDDR6, surpassing the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 504 GB/s on GDDR6X. Bandwidth aids large batch processing.
What are the power requirements?▾
The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses 200 W TDP, lower than the RTX A6000's 300 W. Lower TDP reduces cloud operational costs.
Which architecture is newer?▾
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses Ada Lovelace from 2023, newer than RTX A6000's Ampere from 2020. Newer architecture improves efficiency.
Which is cheaper to rent, the RTX 4070 or the RTX A6000?▾
Cloud rental prices for both the RTX 4070 and RTX A6000 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.
How much VRAM does the RTX 4070 have compared to the RTX A6000?▾
The RTX 4070 has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory. The RTX A6000 has 48 GB of GDDR6 memory.
Can I find RTX 4070 and RTX A6000 GPUs available to rent right now?▾
Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.
What is the main difference between the RTX 4070 and the RTX A6000?▾
The RTX 4070 uses the Ada Lovelace architecture (2023) while the RTX A6000 uses Ampere (2020). The RTX A6000 delivers 1.3x the FP16 throughput and 1.5x the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4070.



