Specifications Compared
| Spec | RTX-4070 | RTX-5000-ADA |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 250W |
| VRAM | 12 GB | 32 GB |
| CUDA Cores | 5,888 | 12,800 |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Form Factors | PCIe | PCIe |
| Interconnect | ||
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 400 |
| FP16 Performance | 29.1 TFLOPS | 65.3 TFLOPS |
| FP32 Performance | 29.1 TFLOPS | 65.3 TFLOPS |
| INT8 Performance | 466 TOPS | 1,044 TOPS |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 576 GB/s |
Performance Analysis
Raw compute power favors the RTX 5000 Ada Generation: its 65.3 TFLOPS FP16 and FP32 ratings deliver 84 percent higher throughput than the RTX 4070 SUPER's 35.5 TFLOPS. This delta translates to faster model training and inference in deep learning pipelines, where FP16 accelerates matrix operations common in neural networks. For instance, training a transformer model completes up to 1.8 times quicker on the RTX 5000 Ada Generation due to doubled floating-point performance. Memory bandwidth of 576 GB/s on the RTX 5000 Ada Generation exceeds the RTX 4070 SUPER's 504 GB/s by 14 percent, supporting larger batch sizes without bottlenecks in data loading. The 32 GB VRAM capacity handles massive datasets or high-resolution models that exceed the RTX 4070 SUPER's 12 GB limit, preventing out-of-memory errors during inference on large language models. Higher TDP of 250 W on the RTX 5000 Ada Generation sustains peak performance longer than the 220 W RTX 4070 SUPER in prolonged workloads.
Live Cloud Pricing
Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.
RTX 4070 SUPER
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() RunPod | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB VRAM | 12GB | 6 vCPU 30GB RAM | 🌍global | $0.50/GPU/hr |
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() TensorDock | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 32GB VRAM | 32GB | 0 vCPU 0GB RAM | Chubbuck, Idaho | $0.55/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() RunPod | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 32GB VRAM | 32GB | 10 vCPU 83GB RAM | 🌍global | $0.83/GPU/hr |
When to Choose the RTX 4070 SUPER
The RTX 4070 SUPER suits budget-conscious users running inference or fine-tuning on small to medium models under 12 GB VRAM. Its 35.5 TFLOPS FP16/FP32 performance and 220 W TDP provide efficient compute for Stable Diffusion or lightweight LLM inference without cloud costs, as no live rental offers exist. Developers prototyping on local setups or low-batch training prefer its GDDR6X speed at 504 GB/s for quick iterations.
When to Choose the RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Opt for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation in production environments needing 32 GB VRAM for large-scale LLM training or scientific simulations. The 65.3 TFLOPS FP16/FP32 and 576 GB/s bandwidth handle massive datasets efficiently, available from $0.25 per hour across five providers. Enterprises benefit from its workstation-grade reliability for sustained high-load inference.
Use Cases
The 32 GB VRAM and 65.3 TFLOPS FP16 performance support larger models and batch sizes than the RTX 4070 SUPER's 12 GB and 35.5 TFLOPS.
32 GB VRAM accommodates high-context-length queries, while 576 GB/s bandwidth ensures low-latency responses beyond the RTX 4070 SUPER's 12 GB limit.
Smaller models fit within 12 GB VRAM of the RTX 4070 SUPER at 35.5 TFLOPS, but 32 GB on RTX 5000 Ada aids complex adapters.
12 GB GDDR6X and 504 GB/s suffice for image generation at 35.5 TFLOPS, matching most workflows without needing 32 GB.
65.3 TFLOPS FP32 and 32 GB VRAM accelerate simulations with large arrays, outperforming the RTX 4070 SUPER's 35.5 TFLOPS.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which GPU has more VRAM?▾
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation provides 32 GB GDDR6 VRAM. The RTX 4070 SUPER offers 12 GB GDDR6X. This makes the RTX 5000 Ada Generation better for memory-intensive tasks.
What are the FP32 performance differences?▾
RTX 5000 Ada Generation delivers 65.3 TFLOPS FP32. RTX 4070 SUPER achieves 35.5 TFLOPS FP32. The 84 percent advantage aids compute-heavy workloads.
How does memory bandwidth compare?▾
RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 576 GB/s bandwidth. RTX 4070 SUPER provides 504 GB/s. The 14 percent higher rate on RTX 5000 Ada improves data throughput.
What is the TDP for each GPU?▾
RTX 5000 Ada Generation requires 250 W TDP. RTX 4070 SUPER uses 220 W. Both fit standard PCIe power delivery.
What are the cloud pricing options?▾
RTX 5000 Ada Generation starts at $0.25 per hour, averaging $0.51 per hour across five offers. No live offers exist for RTX 4070 SUPER.
Are both GPUs from the same architecture?▾
Yes, both use Ada Lovelace from 2023. They share PCIe form factors but differ in VRAM and performance specs.
Which is cheaper to rent, the RTX 4070 or the RTX 5000 Ada?▾
Cloud rental prices for both the RTX 4070 and RTX 5000 Ada vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.
How much VRAM does the RTX 4070 have compared to the RTX 5000 Ada?▾
The RTX 4070 has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory. The RTX 5000 Ada has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory.
Can I find RTX 4070 and RTX 5000 Ada GPUs available to rent right now?▾
Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.
What is the main difference between the RTX 4070 and the RTX 5000 Ada?▾
The RTX 4070 uses the Ada Lovelace architecture (2023) while the RTX 5000 Ada uses Ada Lovelace (2023). The RTX 5000 Ada delivers 2.2x the FP16 throughput and 1.1x the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4070.

