Specifications Compared
| Spec | RTX-2070 | RTX-A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W | 70W |
| VRAM | 8 GB | 6-12 GB |
| CUDA Cores | 2,304 | 3,328 |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Form Factors | PCIe | PCIe |
| Interconnect | NVLink | |
| Tensor Cores | 288 | 104 |
| FP16 Performance | 7.5 TFLOPS | 8 TFLOPS |
| FP32 Performance | 7.5 TFLOPS | 8 TFLOPS |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
Performance Analysis
Compute performance favors the RTX A2000 slightly: its 8 TFLOPS in FP16 and FP32 surpasses the RTX 2070's 7.5 TFLOPS by 6.7 percent, accelerating machine learning training and inference where mixed precision FP16 dominates. In training scenarios, this edge reduces epoch times; for inference, it improves throughput in real-time applications. The Ampere architecture further enhances tensor core efficiency over Turing, benefiting transformer-based models.
Memory bandwidth reveals a clear RTX 2070 advantage at 448 GB/s over 288 GB/s: higher bandwidth supports larger batch sizes in data-parallel workloads, minimizing memory bottlenecks during gradient computations. The RTX 2070's fixed 8 GB VRAM competes with the RTX A2000's base 6 GB but falls short of its 12 GB option for oversized models.
Power consumption differentiates deployment feasibility: the RTX A2000's 70W TDP enables higher density in cloud instances versus the RTX 2070's 175W, lowering cooling and energy costs despite higher hourly rates.
Live Cloud Pricing
Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.
RTX A2000
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 RunPod | NVIDIA RTX A2000 12GB VRAM | 12GB | 6 vCPU 20GB RAM | 🌍global | $0.50/GPU/hr |
When to Choose the RTX 2070
Select the RTX 2070 for budget-driven cloud workloads requiring high memory throughput. Its pricing from $0.02 per hour averaging $0.04 per hour delivers superior value, paired with 448 GB/s bandwidth that handles large batch sizes effectively in training pipelines. The NVLink interconnect supports multi-GPU scaling unavailable on the RTX A2000, ideal for distributed computing on a dime.
When to Choose the RTX A2000
The RTX A2000 suits power-efficient and modern professional tasks. With a 70W TDP, it fits dense server configurations better than the 175W RTX 2070, reducing operational expenses in prolonged runs. Ampere architecture ensures compatibility with latest CUDA libraries, and up to 12 GB VRAM accommodates complex models where the RTX 2070's 8 GB limits scale.
Use Cases
The RTX A2000's 8 TFLOPS FP16 performance and Ampere tensor cores accelerate large model training better than the RTX 2070's 7.5 TFLOPS. Lower 70W TDP supports sustained high-utilization runs.
RTX 2070's 448 GB/s bandwidth aids high-throughput inference batches, while RTX A2000's 8 TFLOPS and efficiency handle latency-sensitive queries. Choice depends on cost versus power needs.
Ampere architecture in RTX A2000 optimizes fine-tuning with superior FP16 at 8 TFLOPS and up to 12 GB VRAM for parameter-heavy adapters. Newer software stack reduces compatibility issues.
RTX 2070's 448 GB/s bandwidth excels in diffusion model generation with large textures, outperforming RTX A2000's 288 GB/s. Lower $0.02 per hour pricing fits iterative creative workflows.
Higher 448 GB/s bandwidth on RTX 2070 speeds data movement in simulations, complemented by NVLink for multi-GPU FP32 tasks at 7.5 TFLOPS. Cost efficiency at $0.04 per hour average seals budget science runs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which GPU has lower cloud pricing?▾
The RTX 2070 offers the lowest pricing from $0.02 per hour with an average of $0.04 per hour across 2 offers. The RTX A2000 starts at $0.06 per hour averaging $0.23 per hour across 3 offers. This makes RTX 2070 ideal for cost-focused users.
What are the FP32 performance differences?▾
RTX A2000 delivers 8 TFLOPS FP32, exceeding RTX 2070's 7.5 TFLOPS by 6.7 percent. This benefits compute-intensive tasks like inference. Both match FP16 ratings accordingly.
Which has more memory bandwidth?▾
RTX 2070 provides 448 GB/s bandwidth, surpassing RTX A2000's 288 GB/s. Higher bandwidth supports larger batches in training. This impacts memory-bound workloads directly.
What is the TDP comparison?▾
RTX A2000 consumes 70W TDP, far lower than RTX 2070's 175W. Lower power enables denser deployments. Efficiency gains offset higher pricing in scaled environments.
Does either support NVLink?▾
RTX 2070 includes NVLink interconnect for multi-GPU communication. RTX A2000 lacks this feature, relying on PCIe. NVLink aids distributed training setups.
Which is better for VRAM capacity?▾
RTX A2000 offers 6-12 GB GDDR6 VRAM flexibility, topping RTX 2070's fixed 8 GB. Choose 12 GB variants for large models. Base 6 GB suits lighter tasks.
Which is cheaper to rent, the RTX 2070 or the RTX A2000?▾
Cloud rental prices for both the RTX 2070 and RTX A2000 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.
How much VRAM does the RTX 2070 have compared to the RTX A2000?▾
The RTX 2070 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The RTX A2000 has 6 to 12 GB of GDDR6 memory.
Can I find RTX 2070 and RTX A2000 GPUs available to rent right now?▾
Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.
What is the main difference between the RTX 2070 and the RTX A2000?▾
The RTX 2070 uses the Turing architecture (2018) while the RTX A2000 uses Ampere (2021). The RTX A2000 delivers 1.1x the FP16 throughput and 1.6x the memory bandwidth of the RTX 2070.