Specifications Compared
| Spec | QUADRO-RTX-6000 | TITAN-XP |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 250W |
| VRAM | 24 GB | 12 GB |
| CUDA Cores | 4,608 | 3,840 |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Form Factors | PCIe | PCIe |
| Interconnect | NVLink | |
| Tensor Cores | 576 | |
| FP16 Performance | 16.3 TFLOPS | 12.1 TFLOPS |
| FP32 Performance | 16.3 TFLOPS | 12.1 TFLOPS |
| Memory Bandwidth | 672 GB/s | 548 GB/s |
Performance Analysis
The Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms the TITAN Xp in raw compute: its 16.3 TFLOPS for FP32 exceeds the TITAN Xp's 12.1 TFLOPS by 35 percent, accelerating single-precision training and simulation tasks. Similarly, FP16 performance at 16.3 TFLOPS versus 12.1 TFLOPS benefits half-precision inference and mixed workloads, though both GPUs maintain equal FP16 and FP32 rates without listed tensor core multipliers.
Memory specifications define practical limits: the Quadro RTX 6000's 24 GB GDDR6 supports batch sizes twice as large as the TITAN Xp's 12 GB GDDR5X, crucial for training large language models or fine-tuning where model sizes exceed 12 GB. Higher bandwidth of 672 GB/s compared to 548 GB/s reduces bottlenecks in data-intensive operations, enabling 23 percent faster memory throughput for inference serving larger inputs.
Power draw remains close at 260W for the Quadro RTX 6000 and 250W for the TITAN Xp, implying similar thermal demands in PCIe setups. Turing's architectural improvements, including NVLink, enhance multi-GPU training scalability over Pascal's limitations.
Live Cloud Pricing
Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.
No live offers available at this time.
When to Choose the Quadro RTX 6000
The Quadro RTX 6000 suits memory-constrained professional workflows: its 24 GB GDDR6 handles datasets too large for the TITAN Xp's 12 GB, ideal for 3D rendering or scientific visualization requiring over 12 GB VRAM. NVLink support enables efficient multi-GPU configurations for scaled simulations.
Users prioritizing Turing's 16.3 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 672 GB/s bandwidth select it for compute-heavy tasks where 35 percent gains over Pascal matter.
When to Choose the TITAN Xp
The TITAN Xp fits power-sensitive legacy systems: its 250W TDP consumes 4 percent less than the Quadro RTX 6000's 260W, beneficial in dense racks or older PSUs. Pascal's 12.1 TFLOPS suffices for lighter inference or gaming-derived compute.
Budget-conscious setups with models under 12 GB VRAM favor it, as 548 GB/s bandwidth supports adequate throughput without NVLink needs.
Use Cases
The Quadro RTX 6000's 24 GB VRAM supports larger models and batch sizes than the TITAN Xp's 12 GB. Its 16.3 TFLOPS FP32 outperforms 12.1 TFLOPS for faster training iterations.
Higher 672 GB/s bandwidth on the Quadro RTX 6000 handles bigger inference batches efficiently versus 548 GB/s. 16.3 TFLOPS FP16 delivers 35 percent more throughput than 12.1 TFLOPS.
24 GB GDDR6 accommodates fine-tuning datasets exceeding 12 GB GDDR5X limits. NVLink aids multi-GPU scaling absent in TITAN Xp.
Quadro RTX 6000's doubled VRAM enables higher-resolution generations without swapping. 16.3 TFLOPS accelerates diffusion steps over 12.1 TFLOPS.
Both provide similar FP32 at 16.3 versus 12.1 TFLOPS for many simulations, but Quadro RTX 6000 excels with 24 GB for large grids. TITAN Xp works if under 12 GB.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which GPU has more VRAM?▾
The Quadro RTX 6000 offers 24 GB GDDR6, double the TITAN Xp's 12 GB GDDR5X. This allows handling larger models in training or inference. Bandwidth also favors Quadro at 672 GB/s over 548 GB/s.
What are the compute performance differences?▾
Quadro RTX 6000 delivers 16.3 TFLOPS in FP16 and FP32, surpassing TITAN Xp's 12.1 TFLOPS by 35 percent. This boosts training and inference speeds. Architectures differ: Turing versus Pascal.
How do TDPs compare?▾
Quadro RTX 6000 requires 260W, slightly more than TITAN Xp's 250W. Both fit PCIe slots with similar cooling needs. Power differences impact dense multi-GPU setups minimally.
Does either support NVLink?▾
Quadro RTX 6000 includes NVLink for multi-GPU interconnect, unlike TITAN Xp. This enhances scaling in professional workloads. Both use PCIe form factors.
Which is newer?▾
Quadro RTX 6000 uses 2018 Turing architecture, newer than TITAN Xp's 2017 Pascal. Turing provides efficiency gains in memory and compute. No live pricing available for either.
Can TITAN Xp handle AI workloads?▾
TITAN Xp's 12.1 TFLOPS and 12 GB VRAM suit smaller AI tasks like basic inference. It lags Quadro RTX 6000's 24 GB and 16.3 TFLOPS for demanding models. Bandwidth at 548 GB/s limits large batches.
Which is cheaper to rent, the Quadro RTX 6000 or the TITAN Xp?▾
Cloud rental prices for both the Quadro RTX 6000 and TITAN Xp vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.
How much VRAM does the Quadro RTX 6000 have compared to the TITAN Xp?▾
The Quadro RTX 6000 has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory. The TITAN Xp has 12 GB of GDDR5X memory.
Can I find Quadro RTX 6000 and TITAN Xp GPUs available to rent right now?▾
Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.
What is the main difference between the Quadro RTX 6000 and the TITAN Xp?▾
The Quadro RTX 6000 uses the Turing architecture (2018) while the TITAN Xp uses Pascal (2017). The Quadro RTX 6000 delivers 1.3x the FP16 throughput and 1.2x the memory bandwidth of the TITAN Xp.