Specifications Compared
| Spec | QUADRO-P6000 | TITAN-XP |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 250W |
| VRAM | 24 GB | 12 GB |
| CUDA Cores | 3,840 | 3,840 |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR5X |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Form Factors | PCIe | PCIe |
| Interconnect | ||
| FP16 Performance | 12.6 TFLOPS | 12.1 TFLOPS |
| FP32 Performance | 12.6 TFLOPS | 12.1 TFLOPS |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 548 GB/s |
Performance Analysis
Compute performance remains closely matched between the Quadro P6000 and TITAN Xp: the P6000 achieves 12.6 TFLOPS in FP32, surpassing TITAN Xp's 12.1 TFLOPS by 4 percent, which translates to marginally faster training for FP32-heavy models like classic CNNs. FP16 rates mirror this at 12.6 TFLOPS versus 12.1 TFLOPS, supporting efficient inference where half-precision applies, though both trail modern GPUs significantly.
Memory capacity creates the starkest divide: P6000's 24 GB VRAM accommodates batch sizes up to twice those of TITAN Xp's 12 GB, preventing out-of-memory errors in large-model fine-tuning or multi-sample inference. This proves vital for workloads scaling with data volume.
Bandwidth favors TITAN Xp at 548 GB/s over P6000's 432 GB/s, accelerating data transfers in bandwidth-bound scenarios such as high-throughput image processing or simulations with frequent memory access. Overall, P6000 suits memory-limited tasks, while TITAN Xp excels in data-movement intensive ones.
Live Cloud Pricing
Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.
Quadro P6000
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Paperspace | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 24GB VRAM | 24GB | 8 vCPU 30GB RAM 50GB Storage | New York | $1.10/GPU/hr | Available | ||
Paperspace | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 24GB VRAM | 24GB | 8 vCPU 30GB RAM 50GB Storage | Amsterdam | $1.10/GPU/hr | Available | ||
Paperspace | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 24GB VRAM | 24GB | 8 vCPU 30GB RAM 50GB Storage | Canada | $1.10/GPU/hr | Available | ||
Paperspace | 2×NVIDIA Quadro P6000 24GB VRAM | 24GB | 16 vCPU 60GB RAM 50GB Storage | New York | $1.10/GPU/hr $2.20/hr total (2×) | Available | ||
Paperspace | 2×NVIDIA Quadro P6000 24GB VRAM | 24GB | 16 vCPU 60GB RAM 50GB Storage | Amsterdam | $1.10/GPU/hr $2.20/hr total (2×) | Available |
When to Choose the Quadro P6000
The Quadro P6000 stands out for memory-constrained workloads. Its 24 GB VRAM handles large models or datasets exceeding 12 GB, ideal for scientific computing or visualization pipelines where TITAN Xp would fragment batches.
Cloud availability at an average of $1.10 per hour across six providers ensures practical deployment for prolonged sessions.
When to Choose the TITAN Xp
The TITAN Xp fits bandwidth-sensitive applications. Its 548 GB/s memory bandwidth outperforms P6000's 432 GB/s, speeding up tasks like real-time rendering or data-parallel processing with heavy memory shuffling.
Users with on-premises setups may prefer it if cloud offers emerge, given identical 250 W TDP.
Use Cases
LLM training demands high VRAM for optimizer states and activations; P6000's 24 GB enables larger models than TITAN Xp's 12 GB.
Inference benefits from memory for concurrent requests and contexts; 24 GB on P6000 doubles capacity over 12 GB.
Fine-tuning mid-sized LLMs fits P6000's 24 GB better, avoiding swaps on TITAN Xp's 12 GB limit.
Diffusion models rely on fast memory access for latent diffusion; TITAN Xp's 548 GB/s bandwidth exceeds P6000's 432 GB/s.
Simulations often exceed 12 GB datasets; P6000's 24 GB VRAM prevents bottlenecks.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Quadro P6000 have more VRAM than TITAN Xp?▾
Yes, the Quadro P6000 provides 24 GB GDDR5X VRAM, twice the TITAN Xp's 12 GB. This capacity supports larger workloads without memory errors.
Which GPU has higher FP32 performance?▾
The Quadro P6000 delivers 12.6 TFLOPS FP32, slightly above TITAN Xp's 12.1 TFLOPS. The difference aids FP32-dominant training tasks.
What is the memory bandwidth comparison?▾
TITAN Xp leads with 548 GB/s bandwidth versus Quadro P6000's 432 GB/s. Higher bandwidth accelerates data-intensive operations.
Are both GPUs available in the cloud?▾
Quadro P6000 offers start from $1.10 per hour across six providers, averaging $1.10 per hour. TITAN Xp has no live cloud offers.
Which has higher power consumption?▾
Both GPUs draw 250 W TDP. Power draw matches, simplifying deployment comparisons.
What architecture do they share?▾
Both use Pascal architecture, with P6000 from 2016 and TITAN Xp from 2017. This ensures compatibility with legacy software.
Which is cheaper to rent, the Quadro P6000 or the TITAN Xp?▾
Cloud rental prices for both the Quadro P6000 and TITAN Xp vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.
How much VRAM does the Quadro P6000 have compared to the TITAN Xp?▾
The Quadro P6000 has 24 GB of GDDR5X memory. The TITAN Xp has 12 GB of GDDR5X memory.
Can I find Quadro P6000 and TITAN Xp GPUs available to rent right now?▾
Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.
What is the main difference between the Quadro P6000 and the TITAN Xp?▾
The Quadro P6000 uses the Pascal architecture (2016) while the TITAN Xp uses Pascal (2017). The Quadro P6000 delivers 1.0x the FP16 throughput and 1.3x the memory bandwidth of the TITAN Xp.