Specifications Compared
| Spec | QUADRO-P6000 | TITAN-V |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 250W |
| VRAM | 24 GB | 12 GB |
| CUDA Cores | 3,840 | 5,120 |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | HBM2 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Volta |
| Form Factors | PCIe | PCIe |
| Interconnect | ||
| FP16 Performance | 12.6 TFLOPS | 13.8 TFLOPS |
| FP32 Performance | 12.6 TFLOPS | 13.8 TFLOPS |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 653 GB/s |
Performance Analysis
Compute throughput differs slightly: TITAN V achieves 13.8 TFLOPS in both FP16 and FP32, surpassing the Quadro P6000's 12.6 TFLOPS by 9.5 percent per precision. This edge benefits training loops with dense matrix multiplications and FP16 inference, reducing iteration times marginally in deep learning frameworks.
Memory bandwidth defines real-world limits: TITAN V's 653 GB/s enables 51 percent faster data movement than P6000's 432 GB/s, supporting larger batch sizes in bandwidth-constrained tasks like transformer training without pipeline stalls. Conversely, P6000's 24 GB VRAM accommodates models exceeding 12 GB, preventing out-of-memory errors during fine-tuning or inference on extensive embeddings.
Power-normalized at 250W TDP, neither excels in efficiency races, but Volta's architecture in TITAN V offers subtle optimizations for mixed-precision workflows over Pascal.
Live Cloud Pricing
Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.
Quadro P6000
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Paperspace | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 24GB VRAM | 24GB | 8 vCPU 30GB RAM 50GB Storage | New York | $1.10/GPU/hr | Available | ||
Paperspace | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 24GB VRAM | 24GB | 8 vCPU 30GB RAM 50GB Storage | Amsterdam | $1.10/GPU/hr | Available | ||
Paperspace | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 24GB VRAM | 24GB | 8 vCPU 30GB RAM 50GB Storage | Canada | $1.10/GPU/hr | Available | ||
Paperspace | 2×NVIDIA Quadro P6000 24GB VRAM | 24GB | 16 vCPU 60GB RAM 50GB Storage | New York | $1.10/GPU/hr $2.20/hr total (2×) | Available | ||
Paperspace | 2×NVIDIA Quadro P6000 24GB VRAM | 24GB | 16 vCPU 60GB RAM 50GB Storage | Amsterdam | $1.10/GPU/hr $2.20/hr total (2×) | Available |
When to Choose the Quadro P6000
Select the Quadro P6000 for workloads demanding over 12 GB VRAM, such as loading large scientific datasets or vision models into 24 GB GDDR5X. Its availability at $1.10 per hour across six cloud providers suits budgeted, memory-intensive tasks like batch processing without swapping.
Professional visualization pipelines benefit from its workstation heritage, handling 432 GB/s bandwidth adequately for renders under 250W constraints.
When to Choose the TITAN V
Choose the TITAN V when memory bandwidth trumps capacity: 653 GB/s accelerates data-heavy inference or simulations versus 432 GB/s. Volta architecture aids legacy tensor-optimized code, providing 13.8 TFLOPS FP16/FP32 at identical 250W TDP.
High-throughput HPC scenarios favor it despite 12 GB HBM2 limits, especially if on-premises rather than cloud due to absent live offers.
Use Cases
Quadro P6000's 24 GB VRAM supports larger batch sizes and models exceeding 12 GB, preventing out-of-memory issues during training. TITAN V's 12 GB limits scale on memory-bound LLMs.
TITAN V's 653 GB/s bandwidth handles high-throughput requests 51 percent faster than 432 GB/s, ideal for latency-sensitive inference. VRAM suffices for most deployed LLMs under 12 GB.
24 GB VRAM on Quadro P6000 fits adapter-heavy fine-tuning datasets, avoiding fragmentation on TITAN V's 12 GB HBM2. Compute parity at 12.6 versus 13.8 TFLOPS minimizes impact.
Both GPUs manage diffusion pipelines with 12.6 to 13.8 TFLOPS FP32; P6000's extra VRAM aids high-res generations, while TITAN V's bandwidth speeds sampling.
TITAN V's 653 GB/s bandwidth accelerates matrix-heavy simulations 51 percent over 432 GB/s. 12 GB VRAM covers most codes, with Volta optimizations.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the VRAM difference between Quadro P6000 and TITAN V?▾
Quadro P6000 has 24 GB GDDR5X, twice the TITAN V's 12 GB HBM2. This allows P6000 to load larger models without errors. Bandwidth favors TITAN V at 653 GB/s over 432 GB/s.
How do FP32 performances compare?▾
TITAN V delivers 13.8 TFLOPS FP32, 9.5 percent above Quadro P6000's 12.6 TFLOPS. FP16 matches this ratio. Both share 250W TDP limits.
Is TITAN V available on cloud GPU rentals?▾
No live offers exist for TITAN V currently. Quadro P6000 averages $1.10 per hour across six providers. Check gpuperhour.com for updates.
Which has higher memory bandwidth?▾
TITAN V provides 653 GB/s, 51 percent more than Quadro P6000's 432 GB/s. This boosts batch sizes in training. VRAM volume reverses the advantage.
What architectures do they use?▾
Quadro P6000 uses Pascal from 2016; TITAN V employs Volta from 2017. Both are PCIe with 250W TDP. Compute peaks at 12.6 versus 13.8 TFLOPS.
Can they handle AI training equally?▾
Quadro P6000 excels in memory capacity at 24 GB for large models; TITAN V leads in 653 GB/s bandwidth for throughput. Choose per workload needs.
Which is cheaper to rent, the Quadro P6000 or the TITAN V?▾
Cloud rental prices for both the Quadro P6000 and TITAN V vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.
How much VRAM does the Quadro P6000 have compared to the TITAN V?▾
The Quadro P6000 has 24 GB of GDDR5X memory. The TITAN V has 12 GB of HBM2 memory.
Can I find Quadro P6000 and TITAN V GPUs available to rent right now?▾
Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.
What is the main difference between the Quadro P6000 and the TITAN V?▾
The Quadro P6000 uses the Pascal architecture (2016) while the TITAN V uses Volta (2017). The TITAN V delivers 1.1x the FP16 throughput and 1.5x the memory bandwidth of the Quadro P6000.