Paperspace vs Scaleway
Paperspace and Scaleway represent distinct approaches in the GPU cloud market for ML/AI workloads. Paperspace, with its Gradient MLOps platform, targets individual developers, educators, and small teams seeking seamless notebook-to-production workflows. It excels in simplifying ML pipelines through integrated notebooks, deployments, and monitoring, backed by per-second billing that suits bursty, experimental usage. Compliance includes SOC 2 and GDPR, making it viable for general-purpose ML but less emphasized on sovereignty. Scaleway, a leading European provider, prioritizes data sovereignty and integrated cloud services, ideal for enterprises needing EU-based operations. Its Nabu AI Supercomputer offers massive GPU clusters (e.g., thousands of H100s), strong environmental credentials via renewable energy, and hourly billing optimized for sustained workloads. Broader compliance (SOC 2, GDPR, ISO 27001) supports regulated industries. Key differentiators: Paperspace's developer-friendly Gradient lowers ops overhead for prototyping; Scaleway's scale and sovereignty suit production-scale training and inference in Europe. Paperspace offers agility for solos/small teams; Scaleway provides cost-effective density for large jobs. Value hinges on geography, workflow maturity, and usage patterns—Paperspace for rapid iteration, Scaleway for compliant, high-volume compute. Both deliver NVIDIA GPUs (A100/H100), but Paperspace edges in ease-of-use, while Scaleway leads in cluster interconnects and sustainability. ML engineers should weigh regional needs against tooling simplicity.
Our Recommendation
Choose Paperspace for individual developers, students, or small teams (<10) focused on quick experimentation, fine-tuning, or prototyping where per-second billing minimizes costs for short runs (<1 hour) and Gradient streamlines workflows without DevOps expertise. Ideal for US/non-EU users with budgets under $5K/month and no strict sovereignty requirements. Opt for Scaleway when European data residency is mandatory, for mid-to-large teams (10+), or production workloads like large-scale training/inference needing integrated services (e.g., Kubernetes, object storage). Hourly billing favors long jobs (>2 hours), and Nabu clusters excel in multi-node scaling. Suited for budgets $10K+/month prioritizing compliance (ISO 27001), green energy, and cost at scale over per-second flexibility. Hybrid users may start with Paperspace for dev, migrate to Scaleway for prod.
Live Pricing
Compare real-time GPU offers from Paperspace and Scaleway
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Paperspace | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 8GB VRAM | 8GB | 8 vCPU 30GB RAM 50GB Storage | Amsterdam | $0.51/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Paperspace | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 8GB VRAM | 8GB | 8 vCPU 30GB RAM 50GB Storage | New York | $0.51/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Paperspace | 4×NVIDIA Quadro P4000 8GB VRAM | 8GB | 32 vCPU 120GB RAM 50GB Storage | Canada | $0.51/GPU/hr $2.04/hr total (4×) | Sold Out | ||
![]() Paperspace | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 8GB VRAM | 8GB | 8 vCPU 30GB RAM 50GB Storage | Canada | $0.51/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Paperspace | 4×NVIDIA Quadro P4000 8GB VRAM | 8GB | 32 vCPU 120GB RAM 50GB Storage | Amsterdam | $0.51/GPU/hr $2.04/hr total (4×) | Sold Out |





A provider offering the Gradient MLOps platform for simplifying notebook-to-deployment workflows.
Best For
Unique Features
- Gradient platform for ML workflows
A major European cloud provider emphasizing data sovereignty and integrated services.
Best For
Unique Features
- Nabu AI Supercomputer
- Strong environmental credentials
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Paperspace | Scaleway |
|---|---|---|
| SSH | ||
| Jupyter Notebooks | ||
| Web Terminal | ||
| API | ||
| Kubernetes | ||
| Containers |
| Feature | Paperspace | Scaleway |
|---|---|---|
| Billing Increment | per-second | per-hour |
| Spot Instances | ||
| Reserved Instances | ||
| Prepaid Credits |
| Certification | Paperspace | Scaleway |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | ||
| HIPAA | ||
| GDPR | ||
| ISO 27001 |
| Feature | Paperspace | Scaleway |
|---|---|---|
| SLA | ||
| Enterprise Support | ||
| Discord Community |
Pricing Analysis
Paperspace employs per-second billing across on-demand (Pro), spot (Core/Garage with up to 90% discounts), and reserved options, enabling precise cost control for variable workloads. No minimums make it ideal for micro-experiments; e.g., A100 at ~$0.99/hour on-demand prorates to pennies for 5-minute jobs. Scaleway uses per-hour billing for on-demand and spot instances (up to 70% off), with commitments for discounts. Minimum 1-hour charge suits steady usage but penalizes interruptions; H100s start ~€2.50/hour on-demand. Paperspace favors intermittent patterns (e.g., daily experiments); Scaleway benefits continuous runs, though spot volatility affects both. No egress fees on Paperspace aid data flows; Scaleway's integrated storage reduces transfer costs in EU.
Paperspace delivers superior value for small experiments/fine-tuning (e.g., <1 hour jobs save 50-90% vs hourly via per-second/spot). For production inference or batch jobs spanning hours, Scaleway's hourly model and Nabu economies yield better ROI at scale (e.g., multi-GPU clusters cheaper per FLOP). Large LLM training favors Scaleway's cluster pricing; real-time inference suits Paperspace's quick scaling but Scaleway for sustained loads. Budget-conscious solos save with Paperspace (~30% lower for bursty); enterprises gain from Scaleway's sovereignty/compliance without premium. Spot reliability lower on both, but Paperspace's Garage offers persistent cheap storage.
Use Case Comparison
Paperspace
Paperspace supports multi-GPU (up to 8x H100) via Gradient for distributed training, with per-second billing ideal for iterative trials. Easy setup suits small-scale LLMs (<70B params), but limited cluster size caps massive jobs. Strong for teams needing quick checkpointing/storage integration.
Scaleway
Scaleway's Nabu Supercomputer shines with 1000s of H100s interconnected via InfiniBand, enabling efficient large-model training (e.g., 100B+ params). Hourly billing and EU sovereignty fit enterprise-scale, long runs; Kubernetes-native for orchestration.
Paperspace
Gradient deployments enable serverless-like batch scaling on GPUs, with per-second efficiency for variable queues. Integrates notebooks for rapid job submission; cost-effective for sporadic high-volume inference via spot instances.
Scaleway
Scaleway offers autoscaling Kubernetes with GPU pools, optimized for batch via integrated Object Storage. Hourly suits predictable loads; Nabu density lowers costs for parallel jobs, enhanced by EU data locality.
Paperspace
Paperspace excels with Gradient's one-click deployments for low-latency endpoints, auto-scaling, and per-second billing for traffic spikes. Suits dev/test; persistent volumes aid model serving without overhead.
Scaleway
Scaleway provides managed Kubernetes/Inference endpoints with NVLink for low-latency multi-GPU. Strong for prod with sovereignty; hourly better for steady traffic, integrated monitoring/CDN.
Paperspace
Gradient's notebook-to-job workflow is purpose-built, with per-second A100/H100 access and versioning. Perfect for rapid iterations; spot/Core options minimize costs for 10-60min runs common in tuning.
Scaleway
Scaleway supports experimentation via RKE2 Kubernetes and GPUs, but lacks Paperspace's ML-specific UI. Hourly billing works for longer tunes; good for EU-compliant teams with custom pipelines.
Technical Comparison
Paperspace uses virtualized instances (KVM) with NVIDIA GPUs (A4000 to H100), offering Gradient-managed Kubernetes, block/NVMe storage (up to 8TB), and 100Gbps networking. Focuses on simplicity over bare metal. Scaleway provides bare metal GPUs (A100/H100), virtual instances, and fully managed Kubernetes (Kapsule); Nabu uses custom liquid-cooled racks with InfiniBand/100Gbps Ethernet. Both support EBS-like volumes; Scaleway emphasizes integrated EU storage (BLOCK/Object) and sovereignty zones.
Both offer A100/H100 with similar single-node perf (e.g., 20-30% H100 uplift). Paperspace scales to 8-GPU nodes effectively for Gradient jobs; multi-node via Slurm/K8s but smaller clusters. Scaleway's Nabu excels in multi-node (1000+ GPUs) with RoCE/IB scaling, lower latency for distributed training (e.g., 1.5x faster Megatron). Availability high on both; Paperspace faster provisioning for small jobs, Scaleway for large reservations. Benchmarks show comparable TFLOPS, but Scaleway greener (100% renewable). Spot interruptions similar.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the minimum billing increment for each provider?▾
Which provider has better compliance certifications for enterprise use?▾
Which provider offers better development tools like Jupyter notebooks?▾
Which provider has better Kubernetes support for orchestration?▾
What is each provider best suited for?▾
Which provider offers reserved instances for long-term savings?▾
Which provider offers better enterprise support?▾
Which provider has better API and automation support?▾
Which provider has better container and Docker support?▾
What unique features differentiate these providers?▾
How do I get started with each provider?▾
Related Comparisons & Pages
NVIDIA A100 PCIe 40GB on Paperspace - Pricing & Availability
NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80GB on Paperspace - Pricing & Availability
NVIDIA H100 PCIe on Paperspace - Pricing & Availability
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 on Paperspace - Pricing & Availability
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 on Paperspace - Pricing & Availability
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 on Paperspace - Pricing & Availability
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 on Paperspace - Pricing & Availability
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 on Paperspace - Pricing & Availability
NVIDIA RTX A4000 on Paperspace - Pricing & Availability
NVIDIA RTX A5000 on Paperspace - Pricing & Availability
Atlantic.net vs Scaleway: GPU Cloud Comparison
AWS vs Paperspace: GPU Cloud Comparison
AWS vs Scaleway: GPU Cloud Comparison
Cirrascale vs Paperspace: GPU Cloud Comparison
Cirrascale vs Scaleway: GPU Cloud Comparison