MI355X vs RTX 3070

CDNA 4vsAmpereUpdated 36 days ago

The MI355X emerges as the clear winner for AI and HPC workloads: its 2300 TFLOPS FP16/FP32 and 288 GB VRAM enable enterprise-scale training and inference unattainable on the RTX 3070's 20.3 TFLOPS and 8 GB. Despite lacking live pricing, superior specs justify selection for performance-critical tasks over the consumer-grade alternative.

Specifications Compared

SpecMI355XRTX-3070
TDP750W220W
VRAM288 GB8 GB
Memory TypeHBM3eGDDR6
ArchitectureCDNA 4Ampere
Form FactorsOAMPCIe
InterconnectInfinity Fabric
FP8 Performance4,600 TFLOPS
FP16 Performance2,300 TFLOPS20.3 TFLOPS
FP32 Performance2300 TFLOPS20.3 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance72 TFLOPS
INT8 Performance4,600 TOPS
Memory Bandwidth8,000 GB/s448 GB/s

Performance Analysis

The MI355X's compute capabilities vastly outpace the RTX 3070: 2300 TFLOPS in FP16 and FP32 enable training large neural networks at scales impossible on the RTX 3070's 20.3 TFLOPS. This delta means the MI355X processes tensor operations over 100 times faster, accelerating deep learning training cycles from days to hours for models exceeding 8 GB VRAM. For inference, the MI355X's FP8 performance at 4600 TFLOPS further optimizes low-precision deployments, reducing latency in production environments.

Memory specifications define real-world usability: the MI355X's 288 GB HBM3e supports enormous batch sizes in training, preventing out-of-memory errors for large language models, while 8000 GB/s bandwidth ensures data flows without bottlenecks. The RTX 3070's 8 GB GDDR6 and 448 GB/s limit it to small batches or model pruning, throttling throughput in memory-intensive tasks. Power draw reflects this gap, with the MI355X at 750 W demanding robust cooling versus the RTX 3070's efficient 220 W, influencing deployment in power-constrained clouds.

Interconnect differences matter for scaling: Infinity Fabric on the MI355X facilitates multi-GPU clusters, unlike the RTX 3070's PCIe form factor suited for single-node consumer setups.

Live Cloud Pricing

Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.

No live offers available at this time.

Compare real-time pricing across 25+ providers

When to Choose the MI355X

The MI355X excels in enterprise AI training and scientific simulations requiring massive VRAM: its 288 GB HBM3e handles models like 100B+ parameter LLMs without partitioning, supported by 2300 TFLOPS FP32 compute. High-bandwidth 8000 GB/s memory enables large batch sizes, reducing training time. Users in HPC environments benefit from OAM form factor and Infinity Fabric for seamless scaling across nodes.

When to Choose the RTX 3070

The RTX 3070 suits budget-conscious users for lightweight inference or gaming: available from $0.04 per hour, it delivers 20.3 TFLOPS FP16 for Stable Diffusion or small model fine-tuning within 8 GB VRAM limits. Its 220 W TDP fits edge deployments or personal clouds, and PCIe compatibility eases integration into standard servers. Cost averages $0.08 per hour across six providers make it ideal for prototyping.

Use Cases

LLM Training
MI355X

MI355X's 288 GB HBM3e VRAM and 2300 TFLOPS FP32 support massive models and large batches. RTX 3070's 8 GB limits it to tiny subsets.

LLM Inference
MI355X

4600 TFLOPS FP8 on MI355X accelerates high-throughput serving. RTX 3070's 20.3 TFLOPS FP16 handles only small-scale inference.

Fine-tuning
MI355X

2300 TFLOPS FP16/FP32 and 8000 GB/s bandwidth on MI355X speed iterations on large datasets. RTX 3070 restricts to small models due to 8 GB VRAM.

Stable Diffusion
RTX 3070

RTX 3070's 20.3 TFLOPS FP16 suffices for image generation at $0.04 per hour. MI355X overkill without pricing availability.

Scientific Computing
MI355X

MI355X's 2300 TFLOPS FP32 and Infinity Fabric enable complex simulations. RTX 3070's 448 GB/s bandwidth bottlenecks large datasets.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the VRAM difference between MI355X and RTX 3070?

The MI355X offers 288 GB HBM3e VRAM, compared to the RTX 3070's 8 GB GDDR6. This allows the MI355X to load models 36 times larger without swapping.

How do FP16 performance levels compare?

MI355X achieves 2300 TFLOPS in FP16, versus RTX 3070's 20.3 TFLOPS. The MI355X provides over 113 times the half-precision throughput for AI tasks.

What are the power requirements?

MI355X has a 750 W TDP, demanding enterprise cooling. RTX 3070 uses 220 W, suitable for consumer or low-power cloud instances.

Is there cloud pricing for these GPUs?

RTX 3070 starts at $0.04 per hour, averaging $0.08 across six offers. MI355X has no live offers currently available.

Which has higher memory bandwidth?

MI355X delivers 8000 GB/s with HBM3e, far exceeding RTX 3070's 448 GB/s GDDR6. This supports larger batches on MI355X without data starvation.

What architectures do they use?

MI355X employs CDNA 4 from 2025 for datacenter AI. RTX 3070 uses Ampere from 2020, optimized for gaming and general compute.

Which is cheaper to rent, the MI355X or the RTX 3070?

Cloud rental prices for both the MI355X and RTX 3070 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.

How much VRAM does the MI355X have compared to the RTX 3070?

The MI355X has 288 GB of HBM3e memory. The RTX 3070 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Can I find MI355X and RTX 3070 GPUs available to rent right now?

Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.

What is the main difference between the MI355X and the RTX 3070?

The MI355X uses the CDNA 4 architecture (2025) while the RTX 3070 uses Ampere (2020). The MI355X delivers 113.3x the FP16 throughput and 17.9x the memory bandwidth of the RTX 3070.

MI355X vs RTX 3070: AMD 288GB vs NVIDIA 8GB | GPUPerHour