L40S vs RTX 4070

Ada LovelacevsAda LovelaceUpdated 36 days ago

The L40S emerges as the winner for most machine learning use cases: 48 GB VRAM, 362 TFLOPS FP16, and 864 GB/s bandwidth enable large models and high throughput, outweighing the RTX 4070's cost advantage at $0.19 per hour average for production-scale tasks.

L40S from $0.55/hrRTX 4070 from $0.50/hr

Specifications Compared

SpecL40SRTX-4070
TDP350W200W
VRAM48 GB12 GB
CUDA Cores18,1765,888
Memory TypeGDDR6XGDDR6X
ArchitectureAda LovelaceAda Lovelace
Form FactorsPCIePCIe
InterconnectPCIe 4.0
Tensor Cores568184
FP8 Performance724 TFLOPS
FP16 Performance362 TFLOPS29.1 TFLOPS
FP32 Performance91 TFLOPS29.1 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance1.4 TFLOPS
INT8 Performance724 TOPS466 TOPS
Memory Bandwidth864 GB/s504 GB/s

Performance Analysis

The L40S outperforms in FP16 at 362 TFLOPS: this accelerates deep learning training and inference significantly over the RTX 4070's 29.1 TFLOPS, enabling quicker iterations on neural networks. The FP32 performance of 91 TFLOPS on the L40S versus 29.1 TFLOPS supports compute-intensive simulations better, reducing runtime for precision-dependent tasks.

Memory bandwidth defines workload feasibility: 864 GB/s on the L40S permits larger batch sizes in training without bottlenecks, unlike the 504 GB/s on the RTX 4070 which limits throughput for memory-bound operations. The 48 GB VRAM on the L40S loads full large language models, avoiding the data swapping required by the RTX 4070's 12 GB.

Power efficiency varies with TDP: the L40S at 350W sustains peak performance in dense servers, while the 200W RTX 4070 suits lower-density, cost-optimized clouds. These specs translate to real-world gains in AI pipelines where scale matters.

Live Cloud Pricing

Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.

L40S

ProviderGPU ModelVRAMHost SpecsRegionPriceStatusAction
TensorDock
TensorDock
NVIDIA L40S
48GB VRAM
$0.55/GPU/hr
Available
RunPod
RunPod
NVIDIA L40S
48GB VRAM
$0.86/GPU/hr
Massed Compute
Massed Compute
4×NVIDIA L40S
48GB VRAM
$0.88/GPU/hr
$3.52/hr total (4×)
Available
Massed Compute
Massed Compute
2×NVIDIA L40S
48GB VRAM
$0.88/GPU/hr
$1.76/hr total (2×)
Available
Massed Compute
Massed Compute
NVIDIA L40S
48GB VRAM
$0.88/GPU/hr
Available

RTX 4070

ProviderGPU ModelVRAMHost SpecsRegionPriceStatusAction
RunPod
RunPod
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12GB VRAM
$0.50/GPU/hr

Compare real-time pricing across 25+ providers

When to Choose the L40S

The L40S stands out for large-scale AI training: its 48 GB VRAM accommodates models exceeding 12 GB, and 362 TFLOPS FP16 speeds convergence. Production inference benefits from 724 TFLOPS FP8 and 864 GB/s bandwidth for high-throughput serving.

Datacenter deployments favor the L40S PCIe 4.0 interconnect for multi-GPU scaling across 18 cloud offers starting at $0.40 per hour.

When to Choose the RTX 4070

The RTX 4070 fits budget prototyping: average $0.19 per hour across 9 offers makes it ideal for fine-tuning models under 12 GB VRAM. Its 29.1 TFLOPS FP16 handles Stable Diffusion or small inference at low 200W TDP.

Light workloads or gaming-adjacent compute prefer the RTX 4070 for affordability without sacrificing Ada Lovelace efficiency.

Use Cases

LLM Training
L40S

L40S 48 GB VRAM and 362 TFLOPS FP16 handle massive models and large batches, unlike RTX 4070's 12 GB limit.

LLM Inference
L40S

L40S 724 TFLOPS FP8 and 864 GB/s bandwidth deliver high throughput for production; RTX 4070 suits only small models.

Fine-tuning
Either

RTX 4070 29.1 TFLOPS FP16 suffices for models under 12 GB at $0.19 per hour average; L40S for larger ones.

Stable Diffusion
RTX 4070

RTX 4070 12 GB VRAM and 504 GB/s bandwidth fit image generation efficiently at low $0.07 per hour minimum.

Scientific Computing
L40S

L40S 91 TFLOPS FP32 outperforms RTX 4070's 29.1 TFLOPS for simulations requiring precision.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which GPU has more VRAM?

The L40S provides 48 GB GDDR6X VRAM, four times the RTX 4070's 12 GB. This enables larger models on L40S. RTX 4070 limits to smaller datasets.

How do cloud prices compare?

L40S starts at $0.40 per hour with $1.10 average across 18 offers. RTX 4070 starts at $0.07 per hour with $0.19 average across 9 offers. RTX 4070 offers better value for light tasks.

Which is better for AI training?

L40S excels with 362 TFLOPS FP16 and 48 GB VRAM for large batches. RTX 4070's 29.1 TFLOPS suits small-scale only. Training speedups reach 12 times on L40S.

What are the TDP differences?

L40S TDP is 350W for sustained datacenter loads. RTX 4070 TDP is 200W for efficient consumer use. Lower TDP reduces cloud cooling costs on RTX 4070.

Do they share the same architecture?

Both use Ada Lovelace from 2023. L40S optimizes for professional compute with higher specs. RTX 4070 focuses on gaming balance.

Which has higher memory bandwidth?

L40S achieves 864 GB/s, surpassing RTX 4070's 504 GB/s. This supports bigger batches on L40S. Bandwidth gaps impact data-heavy workloads.

Which is cheaper to rent, the L40S or the RTX 4070?

Cloud rental prices for both the L40S and RTX 4070 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.

How much VRAM does the L40S have compared to the RTX 4070?

The L40S has 48 GB of GDDR6X memory. The RTX 4070 has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory.

Can I find L40S and RTX 4070 GPUs available to rent right now?

Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.

What is the main difference between the L40S and the RTX 4070?

The L40S uses the Ada Lovelace architecture (2023) while the RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace (2023). The L40S delivers 12.4x the FP16 throughput and 1.7x the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4070.

L40S vs RTX 4070: 12.4x FP16 Gap, 48GB vs 12GB | GPUPerHour