H200 SXM vs RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

HoppervsAda LovelaceUpdated 35 days ago

The H200 SXM emerges as the clear winner for primary cloud GPU use cases on gpuperhour.com, such as AI training and inference. Its 1979 TFLOPS FP16, 141 GB VRAM, and 4800 GB/s bandwidth enable workloads infeasible on the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 29.1 TFLOPS and 12 GB, justifying the $3.68 per hour average despite higher cost.

H200 SXM from $1.99/hrRTX 4070 Ti SUPER from $0.50/hr

Specifications Compared

SpecH200RTX-4070
TDP700W200W
VRAM141 GB12 GB
CUDA Cores16,8965,888
Memory TypeHBM3eGDDR6X
ArchitectureHopperAda Lovelace
Form FactorsSXM, NVLPCIe
InterconnectNVLink, PCIe 5.0, InfiniBand
Tensor Cores528184
FP8 Performance3,958 TFLOPS
FP16 Performance1,979 TFLOPS29.1 TFLOPS
FP32 Performance67 TFLOPS29.1 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance34 TFLOPS
INT8 Performance3,958 TOPS466 TOPS
Memory Bandwidth4,800 GB/s504 GB/s

Performance Analysis

Raw compute metrics reveal dominance by the H200 SXM: 1979 TFLOPS FP16 enables rapid matrix operations critical for deep learning training, where the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 29.1 TFLOPS limits scale. FP32 performance follows suit at 67 TFLOPS for H200 versus 29.1 TFLOPS, impacting simulation and rendering tasks. The H200's FP8 capability of 3958 TFLOPS accelerates quantized inference for large language models. Memory bandwidth defines real-world throughput: 4800 GB/s on H200 sustains large batch sizes in training, preventing bottlenecks with 141 GB VRAM for models exceeding 100 billion parameters. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 504 GB/s and 12 GB VRAM restrict it to smaller batches or models under 7 billion parameters. Power draw underscores efficiency differences: H200 TDP at 700W suits dense clusters via NVLink and InfiniBand, while 200W on RTX 4070 Ti SUPER fits PCIe slots for edge computing.

Live Cloud Pricing

Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.

H200 SXM

ProviderGPU ModelVRAMHost SpecsRegionPriceStatusAction
Vultr
Vultr
NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper
96GB VRAM
$1.99/GPU/hr
Available
Lambda Labs
Lambda Labs
NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper
96GB VRAM
$2.29/GPU/hr
Available
Nebius
Nebius
NVIDIA H200 SXM
141GB VRAM
$2.45/GPU/hr
CoreWeave
CoreWeave
8×NVIDIA H200 SXM
141GB VRAM
$2.58/GPU/hr
$20.64/hr total (8×)
Ori
Ori
4×NVIDIA H200 SXM
141GB VRAM
$3.50/GPU/hr
$14.00/hr total (4×)
Available

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

ProviderGPU ModelVRAMHost SpecsRegionPriceStatusAction
RunPod
RunPod
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12GB VRAM
$0.50/GPU/hr

Compare real-time pricing across 25+ providers

When to Choose the H200 SXM

Select the H200 SXM for enterprise AI training or inference demanding massive VRAM: its 141 GB HBM3e handles full-precision LLMs up to 175 billion parameters without sharding. High bandwidth of 4800 GB/s supports batch sizes over 100, ideal for production-scale fine-tuning. Interconnects like NVLink enable multi-GPU scaling across clusters.

When to Choose the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Choose the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER for cost-sensitive tasks like gaming, lightweight inference, or prototyping: at $0.09 per hour, it delivers 29.1 TFLOPS FP16 for models under 12 GB VRAM. Its 200W TDP and PCIe form factor suit single-node development or Stable Diffusion generation without datacenter overhead.

Use Cases

LLM Training
H200 SXM

H200 SXM's 141 GB VRAM and 1979 TFLOPS FP16 support training models over 100 billion parameters with large batches. RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 12 GB limits it to tiny models.

LLM Inference
H200 SXM

3958 TFLOPS FP8 on H200 SXM accelerates high-throughput serving for 141 GB models. RTX 4070 Ti SUPER handles only sub-12 GB models at 29.1 TFLOPS.

Fine-tuning
H200 SXM

4800 GB/s bandwidth and 67 TFLOPS FP32 enable efficient fine-tuning on full datasets with 141 GB VRAM. RTX 4070 Ti SUPER restricts to small-scale LoRA adapters.

Stable Diffusion
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 29.1 TFLOPS and $0.09 per hour pricing suffice for image generation at 512x512 resolutions. H200 SXM overkill for consumer creative workflows.

Scientific Computing
H200 SXM

H200 SXM's 67 TFLOPS FP32 and NVLink scaling excel in simulations requiring high precision and multi-GPU communication. RTX 4070 Ti SUPER adequate only for modest datasets.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the VRAM difference between H200 SXM and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER?

H200 SXM offers 141 GB HBM3e VRAM, enabling massive models. RTX 4070 Ti SUPER provides 12 GB GDDR6X, suitable for smaller workloads.

How do cloud prices compare for these GPUs?

H200 SXM starts at $1.19 per hour, averaging $3.68 per hour across 24 offers. RTX 4070 Ti SUPER begins at $0.09 per hour, averaging $0.17 per hour across 2 offers.

Which GPU has higher FP16 performance?

H200 SXM delivers 1979 TFLOPS FP16 for AI acceleration. RTX 4070 Ti SUPER reaches 29.1 TFLOPS, over 68 times lower.

What are the memory bandwidth specs?

H200 SXM achieves 4800 GB/s with HBM3e. RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers 504 GB/s on GDDR6X.

What is the TDP for each GPU?

H200 SXM requires 700W for datacenter density. RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses 200W for efficient PCIe deployment.

Which is better for large batch training?

H200 SXM's 141 GB VRAM and 4800 GB/s bandwidth support batches over 100. RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 12 GB limits it severely.

Which is cheaper to rent, the H200 or the RTX 4070?

Cloud rental prices for both the H200 and RTX 4070 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.

How much VRAM does the H200 have compared to the RTX 4070?

The H200 has 141 GB of HBM3e memory. The RTX 4070 has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory.

Can I find H200 and RTX 4070 GPUs available to rent right now?

Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.

What is the main difference between the H200 and the RTX 4070?

The H200 uses the Hopper architecture (2024) while the RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace (2023). The H200 delivers 68.0x the FP16 throughput and 9.5x the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4070.

H200 SXM vs RTX 4070 Ti SUPER: 141GB vs 12GB | GPUPerHour