H200 SXM vs RTX 3070

HoppervsAmpereUpdated 35 days ago

The H200 emerges as the superior choice for prevalent AI and machine learning workloads. Its 1979 TFLOPS FP16, 141 GB VRAM, and 4800 GB/s bandwidth outperform the RTX 3070's 20.3 TFLOPS and 8 GB limits by orders of magnitude, justifying the price premium from $1.19 per hour for production-scale efficiency.

H200 SXM from $1.99/hr

Specifications Compared

SpecH200RTX-3070
TDP700W220W
VRAM141 GB8 GB
CUDA Cores16,8965,888
Memory TypeHBM3eGDDR6
ArchitectureHopperAmpere
Form FactorsSXM, NVLPCIe
InterconnectNVLink, PCIe 5.0, InfiniBand
Tensor Cores528184
FP8 Performance3,958 TFLOPS
FP16 Performance1,979 TFLOPS20.3 TFLOPS
FP32 Performance67 TFLOPS20.3 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance34 TFLOPS
INT8 Performance3,958 TOPS
Memory Bandwidth4,800 GB/s448 GB/s

Performance Analysis

Raw compute power sets the H200 apart dramatically: its 1979 TFLOPS FP16 capability dwarfs the RTX 3070's 20.3 TFLOPS, accelerating deep learning training where half-precision dominates. The H200's FP32 performance of 67 TFLOPS exceeds the RTX 3070's 20.3 TFLOPS, benefiting general-purpose simulations, while FP8 at 3958 TFLOPS optimizes low-precision inference absent on the Ampere card. These metrics translate to faster epochs in model training and higher throughput in inference serving.

Memory specifications further amplify differences. The H200's 141 GB HBM3e VRAM supports massive models and batch sizes that exceed 8 GB GDDR6 limits on the RTX 3070, preventing out-of-memory errors in large language models. Bandwidth of 4800 GB/s on the H200 versus 448 GB/s ensures data flows without bottlenecks during memory-intensive operations like gradient accumulation. Consequently, training times shrink and inference latency drops for high-volume deployments.

Power and form factors reflect usage contexts. The H200's 700W TDP demands robust cooling in SXM or NVL setups with NVLink, PCIe 5.0, and InfiniBand interconnects for multi-GPU scaling, while the RTX 3070's 220W PCIe design suits compact, single-node tasks.

Live Cloud Pricing

Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.

H200 SXM

ProviderGPU ModelVRAMHost SpecsRegionPriceStatusAction
Vultr
Vultr
NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper
96GB VRAM
$1.99/GPU/hr
Available
Lambda Labs
Lambda Labs
NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper
96GB VRAM
$2.29/GPU/hr
Available
Nebius
Nebius
NVIDIA H200 SXM
141GB VRAM
$2.45/GPU/hr
CoreWeave
CoreWeave
8×NVIDIA H200 SXM
141GB VRAM
$2.58/GPU/hr
$20.64/hr total (8×)
Ori
Ori
4×NVIDIA H200 SXM
141GB VRAM
$3.50/GPU/hr
$14.00/hr total (4×)
Available

Compare real-time pricing across 25+ providers

When to Choose the H200 SXM

Opt for the H200 in large-scale AI training and inference where datasets or models surpass 8 GB VRAM. Its 141 GB capacity and 4800 GB/s bandwidth enable batch sizes that fit billion-parameter LLMs, reducing training time via 1979 TFLOPS FP16. Multi-node clusters benefit from NVLink and InfiniBand for distributed workloads at $1.19 per hour starting price.

When to Choose the RTX 3070

Select the RTX 3070 for budget-conscious prototyping, gaming, or small-scale inference under $0.09 per hour average. Its 8 GB VRAM and 20.3 TFLOPS FP16 suffice for fine-tuning compact models or running Stable Diffusion at low cost. Single PCIe deployment fits edge computing without high TDP overhead.

Use Cases

LLM Training
H200 SXM

The H200's 141 GB HBM3e VRAM and 1979 TFLOPS FP16 handle massive datasets and models infeasible on 8 GB. Bandwidth of 4800 GB/s supports large batch sizes for faster convergence.

LLM Inference
H200 SXM

FP8 performance at 3958 TFLOPS on the H200 delivers high-throughput serving for large models. 141 GB VRAM accommodates multiple concurrent requests unlike the RTX 3070's 8 GB constraint.

Fine-tuning
Either

Small models fit RTX 3070's 8 GB VRAM at $0.04 per hour for prototyping. Larger fine-tuning demands H200's 141 GB and 67 TFLOPS FP32.

Stable Diffusion
RTX 3070

RTX 3070's 20.3 TFLOPS FP16 and 448 GB/s bandwidth generate images efficiently at low $0.09 per hour cost. H200 overkill for consumer-scale diffusion tasks.

Scientific Computing
H200 SXM

H200's 67 TFLOPS FP32 and NVLink interconnect scale simulations across nodes. 700W TDP suits HPC clusters versus RTX 3070's single-node 220W limit.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the VRAM difference between H200 and RTX 3070?

The H200 provides 141 GB HBM3e VRAM, enabling large models. The RTX 3070 offers 8 GB GDDR6, suitable for smaller workloads. This gap affects batch sizes in training.

How do cloud prices compare for these GPUs?

H200 SXM starts at $1.19 per hour, averaging $3.83 across 21 offers. RTX 3070 begins at $0.04 per hour, averaging $0.09 over 4 offers. Pricing reflects performance disparity.

Which has higher FP16 performance?

H200 achieves 1979 TFLOPS FP16, vastly exceeding RTX 3070's 20.3 TFLOPS. This boosts ML training speed. FP32 on H200 is 67 TFLOPS versus 20.3 TFLOPS.

What are the memory bandwidth specs?

H200 delivers 4800 GB/s with HBM3e, minimizing data bottlenecks. RTX 3070 provides 448 GB/s GDDR6 for lighter tasks. Bandwidth impacts large model handling.

How do TDPs differ?

H200 requires 700W for datacenter use in SXM form. RTX 3070 uses 220W in PCIe slots. Higher TDP correlates with compute density.

What interconnects does H200 support?

H200 includes NVLink, PCIe 5.0, and InfiniBand for multi-GPU scaling. RTX 3070 lacks specified high-speed links. This enables H200 cluster efficiency.

Which is cheaper to rent, the H200 or the RTX 3070?

Cloud rental prices for both the H200 and RTX 3070 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.

How much VRAM does the H200 have compared to the RTX 3070?

The H200 has 141 GB of HBM3e memory. The RTX 3070 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Can I find H200 and RTX 3070 GPUs available to rent right now?

Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.

What is the main difference between the H200 and the RTX 3070?

The H200 uses the Hopper architecture (2024) while the RTX 3070 uses Ampere (2020). The H200 delivers 97.5x the FP16 throughput and 10.7x the memory bandwidth of the RTX 3070.

H200 SXM vs RTX 3070: 97.5x FP16 Gap, 141GB vs 8GB | GPUPerHour