Specifications Compared
| Spec | H200 | RTX-3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 700W | 220W |
| VRAM | 141 GB | 8 GB |
| CUDA Cores | 16,896 | 5,888 |
| Memory Type | HBM3e | GDDR6 |
| Architecture | Hopper | Ampere |
| Form Factors | SXM, NVL | PCIe |
| Interconnect | NVLink, PCIe 5.0, InfiniBand | |
| Tensor Cores | 528 | 184 |
| FP8 Performance | 3,958 TFLOPS | |
| FP16 Performance | 1,979 TFLOPS | 20.3 TFLOPS |
| FP32 Performance | 67 TFLOPS | 20.3 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 34 TFLOPS | |
| INT8 Performance | 3,958 TOPS | |
| Memory Bandwidth | 4,800 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Performance Analysis
Raw compute power sets the H200 apart dramatically: its 1979 TFLOPS FP16 capability dwarfs the RTX 3070's 20.3 TFLOPS, accelerating deep learning training where half-precision dominates. The H200's FP32 performance of 67 TFLOPS exceeds the RTX 3070's 20.3 TFLOPS, benefiting general-purpose simulations, while FP8 at 3958 TFLOPS optimizes low-precision inference absent on the Ampere card. These metrics translate to faster epochs in model training and higher throughput in inference serving.
Memory specifications further amplify differences. The H200's 141 GB HBM3e VRAM supports massive models and batch sizes that exceed 8 GB GDDR6 limits on the RTX 3070, preventing out-of-memory errors in large language models. Bandwidth of 4800 GB/s on the H200 versus 448 GB/s ensures data flows without bottlenecks during memory-intensive operations like gradient accumulation. Consequently, training times shrink and inference latency drops for high-volume deployments.
Power and form factors reflect usage contexts. The H200's 700W TDP demands robust cooling in SXM or NVL setups with NVLink, PCIe 5.0, and InfiniBand interconnects for multi-GPU scaling, while the RTX 3070's 220W PCIe design suits compact, single-node tasks.
Live Cloud Pricing
Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.
H200 SXM
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vultr | NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper 96GB VRAM | 96GB | 72 vCPU 480GB RAM 960GB Storage | Atlanta | $1.99/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Lambda Labs | NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper 96GB VRAM | 96GB | 64 vCPU 432GB RAM 4096GB Storage | Virginia | $2.29/GPU/hr | Available | ||
Nebius | NVIDIA H200 SXM 141GB VRAM | 141GB | 16 vCPU 200GB RAM | 🌍Europe | $2.45/GPU/hr | |||
![]() CoreWeave | 8×NVIDIA H200 SXM 141GB VRAM | 141GB | 128 vCPU 0GB RAM 61440GB Storage | United States | $2.58/GPU/hr $20.64/hr total (8×) | |||
![]() Ori | 4×NVIDIA H200 SXM 141GB VRAM | 141GB | 96 vCPU 960GB RAM 12000GB Storage | London | $3.50/GPU/hr $14.00/hr total (4×) | Available |
When to Choose the H200 SXM
Opt for the H200 in large-scale AI training and inference where datasets or models surpass 8 GB VRAM. Its 141 GB capacity and 4800 GB/s bandwidth enable batch sizes that fit billion-parameter LLMs, reducing training time via 1979 TFLOPS FP16. Multi-node clusters benefit from NVLink and InfiniBand for distributed workloads at $1.19 per hour starting price.
When to Choose the RTX 3070
Select the RTX 3070 for budget-conscious prototyping, gaming, or small-scale inference under $0.09 per hour average. Its 8 GB VRAM and 20.3 TFLOPS FP16 suffice for fine-tuning compact models or running Stable Diffusion at low cost. Single PCIe deployment fits edge computing without high TDP overhead.
Use Cases
The H200's 141 GB HBM3e VRAM and 1979 TFLOPS FP16 handle massive datasets and models infeasible on 8 GB. Bandwidth of 4800 GB/s supports large batch sizes for faster convergence.
FP8 performance at 3958 TFLOPS on the H200 delivers high-throughput serving for large models. 141 GB VRAM accommodates multiple concurrent requests unlike the RTX 3070's 8 GB constraint.
Small models fit RTX 3070's 8 GB VRAM at $0.04 per hour for prototyping. Larger fine-tuning demands H200's 141 GB and 67 TFLOPS FP32.
RTX 3070's 20.3 TFLOPS FP16 and 448 GB/s bandwidth generate images efficiently at low $0.09 per hour cost. H200 overkill for consumer-scale diffusion tasks.
H200's 67 TFLOPS FP32 and NVLink interconnect scale simulations across nodes. 700W TDP suits HPC clusters versus RTX 3070's single-node 220W limit.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the VRAM difference between H200 and RTX 3070?▾
The H200 provides 141 GB HBM3e VRAM, enabling large models. The RTX 3070 offers 8 GB GDDR6, suitable for smaller workloads. This gap affects batch sizes in training.
How do cloud prices compare for these GPUs?▾
H200 SXM starts at $1.19 per hour, averaging $3.83 across 21 offers. RTX 3070 begins at $0.04 per hour, averaging $0.09 over 4 offers. Pricing reflects performance disparity.
Which has higher FP16 performance?▾
H200 achieves 1979 TFLOPS FP16, vastly exceeding RTX 3070's 20.3 TFLOPS. This boosts ML training speed. FP32 on H200 is 67 TFLOPS versus 20.3 TFLOPS.
What are the memory bandwidth specs?▾
H200 delivers 4800 GB/s with HBM3e, minimizing data bottlenecks. RTX 3070 provides 448 GB/s GDDR6 for lighter tasks. Bandwidth impacts large model handling.
How do TDPs differ?▾
H200 requires 700W for datacenter use in SXM form. RTX 3070 uses 220W in PCIe slots. Higher TDP correlates with compute density.
What interconnects does H200 support?▾
H200 includes NVLink, PCIe 5.0, and InfiniBand for multi-GPU scaling. RTX 3070 lacks specified high-speed links. This enables H200 cluster efficiency.
Which is cheaper to rent, the H200 or the RTX 3070?▾
Cloud rental prices for both the H200 and RTX 3070 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.
How much VRAM does the H200 have compared to the RTX 3070?▾
The H200 has 141 GB of HBM3e memory. The RTX 3070 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.
Can I find H200 and RTX 3070 GPUs available to rent right now?▾
Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.
What is the main difference between the H200 and the RTX 3070?▾
The H200 uses the Hopper architecture (2024) while the RTX 3070 uses Ampere (2020). The H200 delivers 97.5x the FP16 throughput and 10.7x the memory bandwidth of the RTX 3070.


