Specifications Compared
| Spec | H200 | MI355X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 700W | 750W |
| VRAM | 141 GB | 288 GB |
| CUDA Cores | 16,896 | |
| Memory Type | HBM3e | HBM3e |
| Architecture | Hopper | CDNA 4 |
| Form Factors | SXM, NVL | OAM |
| Interconnect | NVLink, PCIe 5.0, InfiniBand | Infinity Fabric |
| Tensor Cores | 528 | |
| FP8 Performance | 3,958 TFLOPS | 4,600 TFLOPS |
| FP16 Performance | 1,979 TFLOPS | 2,300 TFLOPS |
| FP32 Performance | 67 TFLOPS | 2300 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 34 TFLOPS | 72 TFLOPS |
| INT8 Performance | 3,958 TOPS | 4,600 TOPS |
| Memory Bandwidth | 4,800 GB/s | 8,000 GB/s |
Performance Analysis
Memory specifications define key advantages: the MI355X's 288 GB HBM3e VRAM versus the H200's 141 GB supports larger batch sizes and full model loading for massive LLMs, minimizing communication overhead in multi-GPU setups. The MI355X's 8000 GB/s bandwidth exceeds the H200's 4800 GB/s by 67%, accelerating data transfers and enabling higher throughput in memory-bound workloads like training with large datasets.
Compute performance reveals nuanced differences. The MI355X delivers 2300 TFLOPS in FP16 and an identical 2300 TFLOPS in FP32, offering balanced precision for training pipelines that mix tensor cores and matrix operations. The H200 provides 1979 TFLOPS FP16 but only 67 TFLOPS FP32, a 34x gap that limits it in FP32-dominant scientific simulations. For FP8 inference, the MI355X's 4600 TFLOPS edges the H200's 3958 TFLOPS by 16%, suiting quantized model deployments.
Power draw remains close at 750W for MI355X and 700W for H200, suggesting similar density in racks. These specs translate to MI355X favoring memory-intensive training with sustained FP32 needs, while H200 suits FP16-heavy inference where software optimization matters.
Live Cloud Pricing
Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.
H200 SXM
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vultr | NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper 96GB VRAM | 96GB | 72 vCPU 480GB RAM 960GB Storage | Atlanta | $1.99/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Lambda Labs | NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper 96GB VRAM | 96GB | 64 vCPU 432GB RAM 4096GB Storage | Virginia | $2.29/GPU/hr | Available | ||
Nebius | NVIDIA H200 SXM 141GB VRAM | 141GB | 16 vCPU 200GB RAM | 🌍Europe | $2.45/GPU/hr | |||
![]() CoreWeave | 8×NVIDIA H200 SXM 141GB VRAM | 141GB | 128 vCPU 0GB RAM 61440GB Storage | United States | $2.58/GPU/hr $20.64/hr total (8×) | |||
![]() Ori | 4×NVIDIA H200 SXM 141GB VRAM | 141GB | 96 vCPU 960GB RAM 12000GB Storage | London | $3.50/GPU/hr $14.00/hr total (4×) | Available |
When to Choose the H200 SXM
Opt for the NVIDIA H200 SXM when immediate deployment is critical. It features 22 live cloud offers from $1.19 per hour, averaging $3.81 per hour, enabling quick scaling without waiting for MI355X availability. The H200's NVLink, PCIe 5.0, and InfiniBand interconnects integrate seamlessly with mature NVIDIA CUDA ecosystems for established AI pipelines.
Choose H200 for workloads optimized around Hopper architecture, such as FP16-dominant inference at 1979 TFLOPS, where its 4800 GB/s bandwidth suffices and software maturity reduces development time.
When to Choose the MI355X
Select the AMD Instinct MI355X for future-proofing massive AI models requiring 288 GB VRAM, far exceeding the H200's 141 GB. This capacity supports single-GPU loading of models over 100 billion parameters, streamlining inference and training.
MI355X excels in balanced compute scenarios with 2300 TFLOPS across FP16 and FP32, plus 8000 GB/s bandwidth for high-batch training. Infinity Fabric suits AMD-centric clusters planning CDNA 4 adoption.
Use Cases
MI355X's 288 GB VRAM and 2300 TFLOPS FP32 enable larger models and sustained training without precision bottlenecks. H200's 141 GB limits scale, with only 67 TFLOPS FP32.
The 288 GB VRAM supports bigger batch sizes for high-throughput serving versus H200's 141 GB. FP8 at 4600 TFLOPS provides a 16% edge over 3958 TFLOPS.
Both handle fine-tuning well, but MI355X's 8000 GB/s bandwidth speeds iterations on large datasets. H200's availability aids quick starts.
H200's 1979 TFLOPS FP16 suits image generation pipelines optimized for Hopper. Current pricing from $1.19 per hour enables cost-effective prototyping.
MI355X's 2300 TFLOPS FP32 dwarfs H200's 67 TFLOPS for simulations. 288 GB VRAM manages complex datasets.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the VRAM capacity of H200 versus MI355X?▾
The H200 provides 141 GB HBM3e VRAM. The MI355X offers 288 GB HBM3e, doubling capacity for larger models. This difference impacts single-GPU feasibility for LLMs over 141 GB.
Which GPU has higher memory bandwidth?▾
MI355X achieves 8000 GB/s bandwidth. H200 delivers 4800 GB/s, 67% lower. Higher bandwidth reduces bottlenecks in training with large batches.
How do FP32 performances compare?▾
MI355X reaches 2300 TFLOPS FP32. H200 manages only 67 TFLOPS, a 34x disparity. This favors MI355X for FP32-heavy scientific tasks.
What are the current cloud prices for these GPUs?▾
H200 SXM starts at $1.19 per hour, averaging $3.81 across 22 offers. MI355X has no live offers yet. Pricing reflects H200's current availability.
What are the TDPs of H200 and MI355X?▾
H200 consumes 700W TDP. MI355X uses 750W. Similar power allows comparable rack density.
What interconnects do they support?▾
H200 includes NVLink, PCIe 5.0, and InfiniBand. MI355X uses Infinity Fabric. These suit NVIDIA or AMD cluster preferences.
Which is cheaper to rent, the H200 or the MI355X?▾
Cloud rental prices for both the H200 and MI355X vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.
How much VRAM does the H200 have compared to the MI355X?▾
The H200 has 141 GB of HBM3e memory. The MI355X has 288 GB of HBM3e memory.
Can I find H200 and MI355X GPUs available to rent right now?▾
Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.
What is the main difference between the H200 and the MI355X?▾
The H200 uses the Hopper architecture (2024) while the MI355X uses CDNA 4 (2025). The MI355X delivers 1.2x the FP16 throughput and 1.7x the memory bandwidth of the H200.


