Specifications Compared
| Spec | H200 | RTX-4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 700W | 200W |
| VRAM | 141 GB | 12 GB |
| CUDA Cores | 16,896 | 5,888 |
| Memory Type | HBM3e | GDDR6X |
| Architecture | Hopper | Ada Lovelace |
| Form Factors | SXM, NVL | PCIe |
| Interconnect | NVLink, PCIe 5.0, InfiniBand | |
| Tensor Cores | 528 | 184 |
| FP8 Performance | 3,958 TFLOPS | |
| FP16 Performance | 1,979 TFLOPS | 29.1 TFLOPS |
| FP32 Performance | 67 TFLOPS | 29.1 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 34 TFLOPS | |
| INT8 Performance | 3,958 TOPS | 466 TOPS |
| Memory Bandwidth | 4,800 GB/s | 504 GB/s |
Performance Analysis
The H200 NVL dominates in compute with 1979 TFLOPS FP16 and 67 TFLOPS FP32, dwarfing the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 29.1 TFLOPS in both formats. This disparity accelerates deep learning training, where FP16 handles matrix multiplications 68 times faster on the H200 NVL, reducing epochs from days to hours for large datasets. Inference benefits similarly: FP8 at 3958 TFLOPS on H200 NVL supports high-throughput serving of billion-parameter models. Memory specs amplify this: 141 GB VRAM versus 12 GB allows the H200 NVL to load full LLMs without swapping, while 4800 GB/s bandwidth versus 504 GB/s enables larger batch sizes, cutting latency by up to 9.5 times in memory-bound tasks. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 200W TDP suits edge devices, but its PCIe form factor limits multi-GPU scaling compared to the H200 NVL's NVLink and InfiniBand. Real-world throughput scales with these metrics, favoring H200 NVL for production AI.
Live Cloud Pricing
Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.
H200 NVL
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vultr | NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper 96GB VRAM | 96GB | 72 vCPU 480GB RAM 960GB Storage | Atlanta | $1.99/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Lambda Labs | NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper 96GB VRAM | 96GB | 64 vCPU 432GB RAM 4096GB Storage | Virginia | $2.29/GPU/hr | Available | ||
Nebius | NVIDIA H200 SXM 141GB VRAM | 141GB | 16 vCPU 200GB RAM | 🌍Europe | $2.45/GPU/hr | |||
![]() CoreWeave | 8×NVIDIA H200 SXM 141GB VRAM | 141GB | 128 vCPU 0GB RAM 61440GB Storage | United States | $2.58/GPU/hr $20.64/hr total (8×) | |||
![]() Ori | 4×NVIDIA H200 SXM 141GB VRAM | 141GB | 96 vCPU 960GB RAM 12000GB Storage | London | $3.50/GPU/hr $14.00/hr total (4×) | Available |
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() RunPod | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB VRAM | 12GB | 6 vCPU 30GB RAM | 🌍global | $0.50/GPU/hr |
When to Choose the H200 NVL
Choose the H200 NVL for large-scale LLM training or inference requiring over 141 GB VRAM, such as fine-tuning 100B+ parameter models. Its 4800 GB/s bandwidth supports batch sizes impossible on 12 GB GPUs, ideal for enterprise cloud clusters with NVLink interconnects. At $0.50 to $2.39 per hour, it justifies costs for high-utilization data centers.
When to Choose the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Opt for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in budget-constrained prototyping or gaming workloads under 12 GB VRAM. Its 29.1 TFLOPS FP32 suits Stable Diffusion or small fine-tuning at $0.09 to $0.17 per hour. Low 200W TDP fits single-node setups without advanced cooling.
Use Cases
H200 NVL's 141 GB VRAM and 1979 TFLOPS FP16 handle massive datasets and parameters the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 12 GB cannot.
3958 TFLOPS FP8 and 4800 GB/s bandwidth enable high-throughput serving on H200 NVL; RTX 4070 Ti SUPER limits to small models.
67 TFLOPS FP32 and vast VRAM on H200 NVL support efficient large-model adaptation; 12 GB on B restricts scope.
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 29.1 TFLOPS FP16 suffices for image generation at low cost; H200 NVL overkill for single-user tasks.
H200 NVL's interconnects and bandwidth excel in simulations; RTX 4070 Ti SUPER adequate only for modest workloads.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which GPU has more VRAM?▾
The H200 NVL provides 141 GB HBM3e VRAM. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 12 GB GDDR6X. This enables H200 NVL for models exceeding 12 GB.
What is the FP16 performance difference?▾
H200 NVL achieves 1979 TFLOPS FP16. RTX 4070 Ti SUPER reaches 29.1 TFLOPS. H200 NVL is 68 times faster for tensor operations.
How do memory bandwidths compare?▾
H200 NVL offers 4800 GB/s. RTX 4070 Ti SUPER provides 504 GB/s. Larger bandwidth on H200 NVL supports bigger batches.
What are the cloud prices?▾
H200 NVL starts at $0.50 per hour, averaging $2.39 across four offers. RTX 4070 Ti SUPER from $0.09 per hour, averaging $0.17 across two.
Which has higher TDP?▾
H200 NVL consumes 700W. RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses 200W. Higher TDP correlates with H200 NVL's superior compute.
What architectures do they use?▾
H200 NVL uses Hopper from 2024. RTX 4070 Ti SUPER employs Ada Lovelace from 2023. Hopper optimizes for AI advancements.
Which is cheaper to rent, the H200 or the RTX 4070?▾
Cloud rental prices for both the H200 and RTX 4070 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.
How much VRAM does the H200 have compared to the RTX 4070?▾
The H200 has 141 GB of HBM3e memory. The RTX 4070 has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory.
Can I find H200 and RTX 4070 GPUs available to rent right now?▾
Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.
What is the main difference between the H200 and the RTX 4070?▾
The H200 uses the Hopper architecture (2024) while the RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace (2023). The H200 delivers 68.0x the FP16 throughput and 9.5x the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4070.



