Specifications Compared
| Spec | GTX-1080 | QUADRO-RTX-4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 160W |
| VRAM | 8-11 GB | 8 GB |
| CUDA Cores | 2,560 | 2,304 |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Form Factors | PCIe | PCIe |
| Interconnect | ||
| FP16 Performance | 8.9 TFLOPS | 7.1 TFLOPS |
| FP32 Performance | 8.9 TFLOPS | 7.1 TFLOPS |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 416 GB/s |
Performance Analysis
Compute performance provides the GTX 1080 with a distinct advantage: its 8.9 TFLOPS in FP16 and FP32 enables faster matrix multiplications compared to the Quadro RTX 4000's 7.1 TFLOPS, translating to approximately 25 percent higher throughput for FP32-based training and inference workloads. This delta means the GTX 1080 completes standard deep learning epochs quicker, especially in scenarios without heavy reliance on Turing-specific features like RT cores.
Memory bandwidth emerges as the Quadro RTX 4000's strength at 416 GB/s versus 320 GB/s on the GTX 1080: higher bandwidth supports larger batch sizes in memory-intensive tasks, reducing data transfer bottlenecks during training. For inference on large language models, this allows the Quadro RTX 4000 to handle bigger inputs without swapping, potentially improving effective throughput despite lower peak flops.
Power efficiency tilts toward the Quadro RTX 4000 with a 160W TDP against 180W, enabling denser cloud deployments. In real-world terms, the GTX 1080 suits compute-bound workloads like fine-tuning, while the Quadro RTX 4000 excels in bandwidth-limited scientific simulations or diffusion models where GDDR6 efficiency matters.
Live Cloud Pricing
Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.
GTX 1080
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() LeaderGPU | 4×NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB VRAM | 8GB | 0 vCPU 64GB RAM 480GB Storage | Netherlands | $0.30/GPU/hr $1.20/hr total (4×) | Available | ||
![]() LeaderGPU | 8×NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB VRAM | 11GB | 0 vCPU 128GB RAM 480GB Storage | Netherlands | $0.60/GPU/hr $4.80/hr total (8×) | Available |
Quadro RTX 4000
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Paperspace | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 8GB VRAM | 8GB | 8 vCPU 30GB RAM 50GB Storage | New York | $0.56/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Paperspace | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 8GB VRAM | 8GB | 8 vCPU 30GB RAM 50GB Storage | Canada | $0.56/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Paperspace | 2×NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 8GB VRAM | 8GB | 16 vCPU 60GB RAM 50GB Storage | New York | $0.56/GPU/hr $1.12/hr total (2×) | Available | ||
![]() Paperspace | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 8GB VRAM | 8GB | 8 vCPU 30GB RAM 50GB Storage | Amsterdam | $0.56/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Paperspace | 2×NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 8GB VRAM | 8GB | 16 vCPU 60GB RAM 50GB Storage | Canada | $0.56/GPU/hr $1.12/hr total (2×) | Available |
When to Choose the GTX 1080
The GTX 1080 stands out for budget-driven machine learning projects requiring high FP32 or FP16 performance. At $0.30 per hour starting price and 8.9 TFLOPS, it delivers superior value for training smaller neural networks or running inference on models fitting within 8-11 GB VRAM, where the 25 percent flops advantage over the Quadro RTX 4000 offsets its older architecture.
Gaming emulation or legacy CUDA applications also favor the GTX 1080 due to its lower average $0.45 per hour cost across offers.
When to Choose the Quadro RTX 4000
The Quadro RTX 4000 proves ideal for professional workflows demanding Turing architecture benefits and higher memory bandwidth. Its 416 GB/s bandwidth supports larger batch sizes in visualization or CAD tasks, while the 160W TDP suits power-constrained cloud instances.
Users prioritizing certified drivers for enterprise rendering or simulations with GDDR6 efficiency select it despite the $0.56 per hour price, across more abundant 5 live offers.
Use Cases
The GTX 1080's 8.9 TFLOPS FP32 outperforms the Quadro RTX 4000's 7.1 TFLOPS, accelerating training epochs. Lower pricing at $0.30 per hour provides cost savings for extended runs.
Higher 8.9 TFLOPS FP16 on GTX 1080 speeds up batched inference. Cheaper $0.45 average hourly rate suits high-volume serving.
GTX 1080's compute edge and up to 11 GB VRAM handle fine-tuning datasets efficiently. Budget pricing makes iterative experiments affordable.
Quadro RTX 4000's 416 GB/s bandwidth and Turing architecture optimize image generation pipelines. GDDR6 supports larger resolutions without bottlenecks.
GTX 1080 offers higher 8.9 TFLOPS for simulations, while Quadro RTX 4000's bandwidth aids data-heavy codes. Choice depends on compute versus memory needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has higher compute performance, GTX 1080 or Quadro RTX 4000?▾
The GTX 1080 delivers 8.9 TFLOPS in FP16 and FP32, exceeding the Quadro RTX 4000's 7.1 TFLOPS. This makes it faster for general ML workloads. Bandwidth on Quadro reaches 416 GB/s versus 320 GB/s.
How much VRAM do these GPUs have?▾
Both offer 8 GB base VRAM, with GTX 1080 variants up to 11 GB GDDR5X and Quadro RTX 4000 at 8 GB GDDR6. This suits most legacy models. Differences appear in speed via bandwidth metrics.
What are the cloud rental prices for GTX 1080 vs Quadro RTX 4000?▾
GTX 1080 starts at $0.30 per hour, averaging $0.45 across 2 offers. Quadro RTX 4000 averages $0.56 per hour across 5 offers. Price favors GTX for budget tasks.
Is Quadro RTX 4000 more power efficient?▾
Yes, with 160W TDP versus GTX 1080's 180W. This allows more instances per server. Efficiency aids dense cloud deployments.
Which architecture is newer?▾
Quadro RTX 4000 uses Turing from 2018, postdating GTX 1080's Pascal 2016. Turing adds features like tensor cores. Raw flops remain higher on Pascal.
Better for ML training?▾
GTX 1080 excels with 8.9 TFLOPS and lower cost. Quadro suits bandwidth-heavy cases at 416 GB/s. Most training favors the cheaper compute leader.
Which is cheaper to rent, the GTX 1080 or the Quadro RTX 4000?▾
Cloud rental prices for both the GTX 1080 and Quadro RTX 4000 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.
How much VRAM does the GTX 1080 have compared to the Quadro RTX 4000?▾
The GTX 1080 has 8 to 11 GB of GDDR5X memory. The Quadro RTX 4000 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.
Can I find GTX 1080 and Quadro RTX 4000 GPUs available to rent right now?▾
Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.
What is the main difference between the GTX 1080 and the Quadro RTX 4000?▾
The GTX 1080 uses the Pascal architecture (2016) while the Quadro RTX 4000 uses Turing (2018). The GTX 1080 delivers 1.3x the FP16 throughput and 1.3x the memory bandwidth of the Quadro RTX 4000.

