GTX 1080 vs Quadro RTX 4000

PascalvsTuringUpdated 35 days ago

For the most common cloud use case of machine learning training and inference, the GTX 1080 emerges as the winner. Its 8.9 TFLOPS FP32 performance exceeds the Quadro RTX 4000's 7.1 TFLOPS, paired with a lower $0.30 per hour starting price, yielding better price-performance for compute-intensive tasks fitting standard VRAM limits.

GTX 1080 from $0.30/hrQuadro RTX 4000 from $0.56/hr

Specifications Compared

SpecGTX-1080QUADRO-RTX-4000
TDP180W160W
VRAM8-11 GB8 GB
CUDA Cores2,5602,304
Memory TypeGDDR5XGDDR6
ArchitecturePascalTuring
Form FactorsPCIePCIe
Interconnect
FP16 Performance8.9 TFLOPS7.1 TFLOPS
FP32 Performance8.9 TFLOPS7.1 TFLOPS
Memory Bandwidth320 GB/s416 GB/s

Performance Analysis

Compute performance provides the GTX 1080 with a distinct advantage: its 8.9 TFLOPS in FP16 and FP32 enables faster matrix multiplications compared to the Quadro RTX 4000's 7.1 TFLOPS, translating to approximately 25 percent higher throughput for FP32-based training and inference workloads. This delta means the GTX 1080 completes standard deep learning epochs quicker, especially in scenarios without heavy reliance on Turing-specific features like RT cores.

Memory bandwidth emerges as the Quadro RTX 4000's strength at 416 GB/s versus 320 GB/s on the GTX 1080: higher bandwidth supports larger batch sizes in memory-intensive tasks, reducing data transfer bottlenecks during training. For inference on large language models, this allows the Quadro RTX 4000 to handle bigger inputs without swapping, potentially improving effective throughput despite lower peak flops.

Power efficiency tilts toward the Quadro RTX 4000 with a 160W TDP against 180W, enabling denser cloud deployments. In real-world terms, the GTX 1080 suits compute-bound workloads like fine-tuning, while the Quadro RTX 4000 excels in bandwidth-limited scientific simulations or diffusion models where GDDR6 efficiency matters.

Live Cloud Pricing

Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.

GTX 1080

ProviderGPU ModelVRAMHost SpecsRegionPriceStatusAction
LeaderGPU
LeaderGPU
4×NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
8GB VRAM
$0.30/GPU/hr
$1.20/hr total (4×)
Available
LeaderGPU
LeaderGPU
8×NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
11GB VRAM
$0.60/GPU/hr
$4.80/hr total (8×)
Available

Quadro RTX 4000

ProviderGPU ModelVRAMHost SpecsRegionPriceStatusAction
Paperspace
Paperspace
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
8GB VRAM
$0.56/GPU/hr
Available
Paperspace
Paperspace
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
8GB VRAM
$0.56/GPU/hr
Available
Paperspace
Paperspace
2×NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
8GB VRAM
$0.56/GPU/hr
$1.12/hr total (2×)
Available
Paperspace
Paperspace
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
8GB VRAM
$0.56/GPU/hr
Available
Paperspace
Paperspace
2×NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
8GB VRAM
$0.56/GPU/hr
$1.12/hr total (2×)
Available

Compare real-time pricing across 25+ providers

When to Choose the GTX 1080

The GTX 1080 stands out for budget-driven machine learning projects requiring high FP32 or FP16 performance. At $0.30 per hour starting price and 8.9 TFLOPS, it delivers superior value for training smaller neural networks or running inference on models fitting within 8-11 GB VRAM, where the 25 percent flops advantage over the Quadro RTX 4000 offsets its older architecture.

Gaming emulation or legacy CUDA applications also favor the GTX 1080 due to its lower average $0.45 per hour cost across offers.

When to Choose the Quadro RTX 4000

The Quadro RTX 4000 proves ideal for professional workflows demanding Turing architecture benefits and higher memory bandwidth. Its 416 GB/s bandwidth supports larger batch sizes in visualization or CAD tasks, while the 160W TDP suits power-constrained cloud instances.

Users prioritizing certified drivers for enterprise rendering or simulations with GDDR6 efficiency select it despite the $0.56 per hour price, across more abundant 5 live offers.

Use Cases

LLM Training
GTX 1080

The GTX 1080's 8.9 TFLOPS FP32 outperforms the Quadro RTX 4000's 7.1 TFLOPS, accelerating training epochs. Lower pricing at $0.30 per hour provides cost savings for extended runs.

LLM Inference
GTX 1080

Higher 8.9 TFLOPS FP16 on GTX 1080 speeds up batched inference. Cheaper $0.45 average hourly rate suits high-volume serving.

Fine-tuning
GTX 1080

GTX 1080's compute edge and up to 11 GB VRAM handle fine-tuning datasets efficiently. Budget pricing makes iterative experiments affordable.

Stable Diffusion
Quadro RTX 4000

Quadro RTX 4000's 416 GB/s bandwidth and Turing architecture optimize image generation pipelines. GDDR6 supports larger resolutions without bottlenecks.

Scientific Computing
Either

GTX 1080 offers higher 8.9 TFLOPS for simulations, while Quadro RTX 4000's bandwidth aids data-heavy codes. Choice depends on compute versus memory needs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has higher compute performance, GTX 1080 or Quadro RTX 4000?

The GTX 1080 delivers 8.9 TFLOPS in FP16 and FP32, exceeding the Quadro RTX 4000's 7.1 TFLOPS. This makes it faster for general ML workloads. Bandwidth on Quadro reaches 416 GB/s versus 320 GB/s.

How much VRAM do these GPUs have?

Both offer 8 GB base VRAM, with GTX 1080 variants up to 11 GB GDDR5X and Quadro RTX 4000 at 8 GB GDDR6. This suits most legacy models. Differences appear in speed via bandwidth metrics.

What are the cloud rental prices for GTX 1080 vs Quadro RTX 4000?

GTX 1080 starts at $0.30 per hour, averaging $0.45 across 2 offers. Quadro RTX 4000 averages $0.56 per hour across 5 offers. Price favors GTX for budget tasks.

Is Quadro RTX 4000 more power efficient?

Yes, with 160W TDP versus GTX 1080's 180W. This allows more instances per server. Efficiency aids dense cloud deployments.

Which architecture is newer?

Quadro RTX 4000 uses Turing from 2018, postdating GTX 1080's Pascal 2016. Turing adds features like tensor cores. Raw flops remain higher on Pascal.

Better for ML training?

GTX 1080 excels with 8.9 TFLOPS and lower cost. Quadro suits bandwidth-heavy cases at 416 GB/s. Most training favors the cheaper compute leader.

Which is cheaper to rent, the GTX 1080 or the Quadro RTX 4000?

Cloud rental prices for both the GTX 1080 and Quadro RTX 4000 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.

How much VRAM does the GTX 1080 have compared to the Quadro RTX 4000?

The GTX 1080 has 8 to 11 GB of GDDR5X memory. The Quadro RTX 4000 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Can I find GTX 1080 and Quadro RTX 4000 GPUs available to rent right now?

Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.

What is the main difference between the GTX 1080 and the Quadro RTX 4000?

The GTX 1080 uses the Pascal architecture (2016) while the Quadro RTX 4000 uses Turing (2018). The GTX 1080 delivers 1.3x the FP16 throughput and 1.3x the memory bandwidth of the Quadro RTX 4000.

GTX 1080 vs Quadro RTX 4000: 11GB GDDR5X vs 8GB GDDR6 | GPUPerHour