Specifications Compared
| Spec | GTX-1080 | QUADRO-RTX-5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 230W |
| VRAM | 8-11 GB | 16 GB |
| CUDA Cores | 2,560 | 3,072 |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Form Factors | PCIe | PCIe |
| Interconnect | NVLink | |
| FP16 Performance | 8.9 TFLOPS | 11.2 TFLOPS |
| FP32 Performance | 8.9 TFLOPS | 11.2 TFLOPS |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Performance Analysis
Compute performance differs notably: the Quadro RTX 5000 achieves 11.2 TFLOPS in both FP16 and FP32, surpassing the GTX 1080 Ti's 8.9 TFLOPS by 26 percent. This advantage translates to faster model training and inference, particularly in FP16-optimized deep learning frameworks where the Quadro RTX 5000 processes operations 26 percent quicker. For inference workloads, higher TFLOPS enable higher throughput on large language models. Memory bandwidth impacts data transfer efficiency: 448 GB/s on the Quadro RTX 5000 versus 320 GB/s on the GTX 1080 Ti allows 40 percent larger batch sizes without bottlenecks, reducing training times for memory-intensive tasks. The Quadro RTX 5000's 16 GB VRAM exceeds the GTX 1080 Ti's 8 to 11 GB, accommodating bigger models or datasets directly. In real-world scenarios, these specs mean the Quadro RTX 5000 handles modern AI pipelines with less swapping to host memory.
Live Cloud Pricing
Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.
GTX 1080 Ti
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 LeaderGPU | 4×NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB VRAM | 8GB | 0 vCPU 64GB RAM 480GB Storage | Netherlands | $0.30/GPU/hr $1.20/hr total (4×) | Available | ||
LeaderGPU | 8×NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB VRAM | 11GB | 0 vCPU 128GB RAM 480GB Storage | Netherlands | $0.60/GPU/hr $4.80/hr total (8×) | Available |
Quadro RTX 5000
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Paperspace | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 16GB VRAM | 16GB | 8 vCPU 30GB RAM 50GB Storage | New York | $0.82/GPU/hr | Available | ||
Paperspace | 2×NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 16GB VRAM | 16GB | 16 vCPU 60GB RAM 50GB Storage | New York | $0.82/GPU/hr $1.64/hr total (2×) | Available |
When to Choose the GTX 1080 Ti
The GTX 1080 Ti suits budget-conscious users with cloud pricing from $0.60 per hour. Its 180 W TDP fits power-limited instances, and 8.9 TFLOPS suffices for lightweight inference or fine-tuning small models under 8 GB VRAM. Deploy it for cost-sensitive prototyping where 320 GB/s bandwidth meets needs.
When to Choose the Quadro RTX 5000
Opt for the Quadro RTX 5000 in professional settings requiring 16 GB VRAM and NVLink for multi-GPU training. Its 11.2 TFLOPS and 448 GB/s bandwidth excel in large-scale LLM training or Stable Diffusion with batch sizes exceeding GTX 1080 Ti limits. Certification ensures stability despite $0.82 per hour cost.
Use Cases
The Quadro RTX 5000's 16 GB VRAM and 448 GB/s bandwidth support larger models and batches than the GTX 1080 Ti's 8-11 GB and 320 GB/s. Its 11.2 TFLOPS provides 26 percent faster training.
Higher 11.2 TFLOPS FP16 on the Quadro RTX 5000 delivers better throughput for inference. NVLink enables scaling absent in the GTX 1080 Ti.
Fine-tuning smaller models fits within GTX 1080 Ti's 8-11 GB VRAM at $0.60 per hour. Quadro RTX 5000's extra capacity aids larger ones.
Quadro RTX 5000's Turing architecture and 16 GB VRAM handle high-resolution generation better than Pascal-based GTX 1080 Ti.
GTX 1080 Ti's lower $0.60 per hour cost and 180 W TDP suit moderate FP32 workloads at 8.9 TFLOPS without needing 16 GB VRAM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which GPU has more VRAM?▾
The Quadro RTX 5000 offers 16 GB GDDR6 VRAM. The GTX 1080 Ti provides 8 to 11 GB GDDR5X. This makes the Quadro RTX 5000 better for large models.
What is the compute performance difference?▾
Quadro RTX 5000 delivers 11.2 TFLOPS in FP16 and FP32. GTX 1080 Ti achieves 8.9 TFLOPS in both. The gap equals 26 percent higher performance on Quadro RTX 5000.
How do memory bandwidths compare?▾
Quadro RTX 5000 has 448 GB/s bandwidth. GTX 1080 Ti offers 320 GB/s. This 40 percent edge aids larger batch sizes on Quadro RTX 5000.
What are the cloud prices?▾
GTX 1080 Ti pricing starts at $0.60 per hour average across one offer. Quadro RTX 5000 begins at $0.82 per hour average over two offers.
Which has lower power consumption?▾
GTX 1080 Ti uses 180 W TDP. Quadro RTX 5000 requires 230 W. Lower TDP suits constrained cloud instances with GTX 1080 Ti.
Does either support NVLink?▾
Quadro RTX 5000 includes NVLink interconnect for multi-GPU. GTX 1080 Ti lacks this feature. NVLink enhances scaling on Quadro RTX 5000.
Which is cheaper to rent, the GTX 1080 or the Quadro RTX 5000?▾
Cloud rental prices for both the GTX 1080 and Quadro RTX 5000 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.
How much VRAM does the GTX 1080 have compared to the Quadro RTX 5000?▾
The GTX 1080 has 8 to 11 GB of GDDR5X memory. The Quadro RTX 5000 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory.
Can I find GTX 1080 and Quadro RTX 5000 GPUs available to rent right now?▾
Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.
What is the main difference between the GTX 1080 and the Quadro RTX 5000?▾
The GTX 1080 uses the Pascal architecture (2016) while the Quadro RTX 5000 uses Turing (2018). The Quadro RTX 5000 delivers 1.3x the FP16 throughput and 1.4x the memory bandwidth of the GTX 1080.