Specifications Compared
| Spec | GTX-1080 | L40S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 350W |
| VRAM | 8-11 GB | 48 GB |
| CUDA Cores | 2,560 | 18,176 |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6X |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ada Lovelace |
| Form Factors | PCIe | PCIe |
| Interconnect | PCIe 4.0 | |
| FP16 Performance | 8.9 TFLOPS | 362 TFLOPS |
| FP32 Performance | 8.9 TFLOPS | 91 TFLOPS |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 864 GB/s |
Performance Analysis
Performance differences dominate real-world applications: the L40S FP32 throughput of 91 TFLOPS outpaces the GTX 1080 Ti's 11.3 TFLOPS by a factor of eight, speeding up general compute tasks. FP16 performance on the L40S reaches 362 TFLOPS, over 32 times the 11.3 TFLOPS of the GTX 1080 Ti, which accelerates deep learning training where half-precision is standard.
Higher memory bandwidth of 864 GB/s on the L40S versus 484 GB/s on the GTX 1080 Ti enables larger batch sizes in inference, minimizing latency for models like LLMs. The 48 GB VRAM capacity handles massive datasets that exceed the GTX 1080 Ti's 11 GB limit, preventing out-of-memory errors in fine-tuning. The L40S 350 W TDP reflects its power for sustained workloads, compared to 250 W on the older card.
Live Cloud Pricing
Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.
GTX 1080 Ti
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 LeaderGPU | 4×NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB VRAM | 8GB | 0 vCPU 64GB RAM 480GB Storage | Netherlands | $0.30/GPU/hr $1.20/hr total (4×) | Available | ||
LeaderGPU | 8×NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB VRAM | 11GB | 0 vCPU 128GB RAM 480GB Storage | Netherlands | $0.60/GPU/hr $4.80/hr total (8×) | Available |
L40S
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 TensorDock | NVIDIA L40S 48GB VRAM | 48GB | 0 vCPU 0GB RAM | Wolverhampton | $0.55/GPU/hr | Available | ||
 RunPod | NVIDIA L40S 48GB VRAM | 48GB | 16 vCPU 94GB RAM | 🌍global | $0.86/GPU/hr | |||
 Massed Compute | 4×NVIDIA L40S 48GB VRAM | 48GB | 46 vCPU 288GB RAM 2500GB Storage | Iowa | $0.88/GPU/hr $3.52/hr total (4×) | Available | ||
Massed Compute | 2×NVIDIA L40S 48GB VRAM | 48GB | 24 vCPU 144GB RAM 1250GB Storage | Iowa | $0.88/GPU/hr $1.76/hr total (2×) | Available | ||
Massed Compute | NVIDIA L40S 48GB VRAM | 48GB | 12 vCPU 72GB RAM 625GB Storage | Iowa | $0.88/GPU/hr | Available |
When to Choose the GTX 1080 Ti
The GTX 1080 Ti fits scenarios with tight budgets and light workloads. Its $0.60 per hour pricing and single stable offer suit hobbyist gaming, basic rendering, or legacy software using under 11 GB VRAM and 11.3 TFLOPS FP32. Lower 250 W TDP reduces cloud power costs for intermittent tasks.
When to Choose the L40S
The L40S is optimal for AI and machine learning demands. With 48 GB VRAM and 362 TFLOPS FP16, it manages large-scale LLM training or inference unavailable on the GTX 1080 Ti. Entry pricing from $0.40 per hour across 23 offers provides scalability for production environments.
Use Cases
L40S 48 GB VRAM and 362 TFLOPS FP16 support massive models and fast training. GTX 1080 Ti 11 GB VRAM limits scale.
L40S 864 GB/s bandwidth and 91 TFLOPS FP32 handle high-throughput inference. GTX 1080 Ti 484 GB/s bandwidth constrains batch sizes.
L40S FP16 362 TFLOPS accelerates fine-tuning of large models fitting in 48 GB VRAM. GTX 1080 Ti lacks capacity beyond 11 GB.
L40S high FP16 and VRAM speed up image generation at scale. GTX 1080 Ti suffices only for small resolutions.
L40S 91 TFLOPS FP32 outperforms GTX 1080 Ti 11.3 TFLOPS for simulations. Larger VRAM aids complex datasets.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which GPU has better performance for AI training?▾
The L40S provides 362 TFLOPS FP16, over 32 times the GTX 1080 Ti's 11.3 TFLOPS. This gap accelerates training cycles. VRAM difference of 48 GB versus 11 GB further favors L40S for large models.
What is the VRAM comparison between GTX 1080 Ti and L40S?▾
L40S offers 48 GB GDDR6X, while GTX 1080 Ti has 11 GB GDDR5X. Bandwidth reaches 864 GB/s on L40S versus 484 GB/s on GTX 1080 Ti. This supports bigger batches on L40S.
How do cloud prices compare for these GPUs?▾
GTX 1080 Ti averages $0.60 per hour across one offer. L40S starts at $0.40 per hour, averaging $1.13 across 23 offers. Cheaper entry for L40S suits variable needs.
Is GTX 1080 Ti suitable for modern ML inference?▾
GTX 1080 Ti 11.3 TFLOPS FP32 limits it to small models under 11 GB VRAM. L40S 91 TFLOPS FP32 and 48 GB VRAM handle production inference. Legacy tasks favor the older card.
What are the power requirements?▾
GTX 1080 Ti TDP is 250 W, lower than L40S 350 W. This impacts cloud costs for long runs. L40S justifies higher power with superior 362 TFLOPS FP16.
Which architecture is newer?▾
L40S uses Ada Lovelace from 2023 with PCIe 4.0. GTX 1080 Ti relies on Pascal from 2016. Newer design yields FP8 724 TFLOPS on L40S.
Which is cheaper to rent, the GTX 1080 or the L40S?▾
Cloud rental prices for both the GTX 1080 and L40S vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.
How much VRAM does the GTX 1080 have compared to the L40S?▾
The GTX 1080 has 8 to 11 GB of GDDR5X memory. The L40S has 48 GB of GDDR6X memory.
Can I find GTX 1080 and L40S GPUs available to rent right now?▾
Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.
What is the main difference between the GTX 1080 and the L40S?▾
The GTX 1080 uses the Pascal architecture (2016) while the L40S uses Ada Lovelace (2023). The L40S delivers 40.7x the FP16 throughput and 2.7x the memory bandwidth of the GTX 1080.