GH200 vs RTX A5000

HoppervsAmpereUpdated 36 days ago

The GH200 emerges as the winner for prevalent AI workloads: 1979 TFLOPS FP16 and 96 GB VRAM enable training and inference at scales A5000's 27.8 TFLOPS and 24 GB cannot match. Cost premium aligns with transformative performance gains.

GH200 from $1.99/hrRTX A5000 from $0.23/hr

Specifications Compared

SpecGH200RTX-A5000
TDP900W230W
VRAM96 GB24 GB
CUDA Cores16,8968,192
Memory TypeHBM3GDDR6
ArchitectureHopperAmpere
Form FactorsSXMPCIe
InterconnectNVLink-C2C, PCIe 5.0NVLink
Tensor Cores528256
FP8 Performance3,958 TFLOPS
FP16 Performance1,979 TFLOPS27.8 TFLOPS
FP32 Performance67 TFLOPS27.8 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance34 TFLOPS
INT8 Performance3,958 TOPS
Memory Bandwidth4,000 GB/s768 GB/s

Performance Analysis

Superior FP16 performance defines the GH200: 1979 TFLOPS enables rapid AI training where half-precision dominates, outstripping A5000's 27.8 TFLOPS by over 70 times. FP32 at 67 TFLOPS on GH200 exceeds A5000's matching 27.8 TFLOPS, but the disparity emphasizes GH200's AI focus.

FP8 throughput reaches 3958 TFLOPS on GH200, ideal for efficient inference on quantized models. Memory bandwidth of 4000 GB/s on GH200 supports expansive batch sizes during training, minimizing overhead versus A5000's constrained 768 GB/s which limits dataset handling.

TDP differences impact deployment: GH200's 900W requires enterprise infrastructure, whereas A5000's 230W fits diverse environments. Interconnects like GH200's NVLink-C2C enhance multi-GPU scaling over A5000's NVLink.

Live Cloud Pricing

Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.

GH200

ProviderGPU ModelVRAMHost SpecsRegionPriceStatusAction
Vultr
Vultr
NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper
96GB VRAM
$1.99/GPU/hr
Available
Lambda Labs
Lambda Labs
NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper
96GB VRAM
$2.29/GPU/hr
Available
Denvr
Denvr
NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper
96GB VRAM
$3.87/GPU/hr
CoreWeave
CoreWeave
NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper
96GB VRAM
$6.50/GPU/hr

RTX A5000

ProviderGPU ModelVRAMHost SpecsRegionPriceStatusAction
Vast.ai
Vast.ai
4×NVIDIA RTX A5000
24GB VRAM
$0.23/GPU/hr
$0.92/hr total (4×)
Available
Vast.ai
Vast.ai
NVIDIA RTX A5000
24GB VRAM
$0.24/GPU/hr
Available
RunPod
RunPod
NVIDIA RTX A5000
24GB VRAM
$0.27/GPU/hr
Cirrascale
Cirrascale
8×NVIDIA RTX A5000
24GB VRAM
$0.41/GPU/hr
$3.28/hr total (8×)
Cirrascale
Cirrascale
8×NVIDIA RTX A5000
24GB VRAM
$0.46/GPU/hr
$3.68/hr total (8×)

Compare real-time pricing across 25+ providers

When to Choose the GH200

The GH200 suits large-scale AI training and inference: its 96 GB HBM3 VRAM accommodates models exceeding 24 GB limits of A5000. Bandwidth at 4000 GB/s enables high batch sizes for faster epochs in LLM development.

Data centers benefit from SXM form factor and NVLink-C2C for seamless scaling, justifying $3.59 per hour average cost.

When to Choose the RTX A5000

The RTX A5000 fits budget-conscious prototyping and moderate workloads: starting at $0.03 per hour, it undercuts GH200's $1.99 per hour entry. 24 GB GDDR6 handles fine-tuning or visualization within 768 GB/s bandwidth.

PCIe form factor and 230W TDP support workstation or edge deployments without data center demands.

Use Cases

LLM Training
GH200

GH200's 96 GB HBM3 VRAM and 1979 TFLOPS FP16 handle massive parameter counts and large batches unattainable on A5000.

LLM Inference
GH200

3958 TFLOPS FP8 on GH200 delivers high-throughput quantized inference; 4000 GB/s bandwidth supports real-time scaling.

Fine-tuning
GH200

96 GB VRAM and 4000 GB/s bandwidth accelerate fine-tuning on extensive datasets versus A5000's 24 GB limit.

Stable Diffusion
RTX A5000

A5000's 24 GB GDDR6 suffices for image generation at 27.8 TFLOPS FP16 and $0.44 per hour average cost.

Scientific Computing
Either

A5000 manages FP32 tasks at 27.8 TFLOPS affordably; GH200's 67 TFLOPS FP32 excels in extreme simulations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the VRAM capacity of GH200 versus RTX A5000?

GH200 features 96 GB HBM3 VRAM. RTX A5000 provides 24 GB GDDR6. This difference allows GH200 to load significantly larger models.

How do FP16 performances compare?

GH200 achieves 1979 TFLOPS in FP16. RTX A5000 reaches 27.8 TFLOPS. GH200 accelerates AI training by a factor exceeding 70.

What are the cloud rental prices?

GH200 starts from $1.99 per hour, averaging $3.59 across 4 offers. RTX A5000 begins at $0.03 per hour, averaging $0.44 across 32 offers.

Which GPU has higher memory bandwidth?

GH200 delivers 4000 GB/s bandwidth. RTX A5000 offers 768 GB/s. Higher bandwidth on GH200 supports larger training batches.

What are the TDP ratings?

GH200 has a 900W TDP. RTX A5000 uses 230W. Lower TDP on A5000 enables broader deployment flexibility.

Which architecture is newer?

GH200 uses Hopper from 2023. RTX A5000 employs Ampere from 2021. Hopper provides advanced AI optimizations like FP8 support.

Which is cheaper to rent, the GH200 or the RTX A5000?

Cloud rental prices for both the GH200 and RTX A5000 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.

How much VRAM does the GH200 have compared to the RTX A5000?

The GH200 has 96 GB of HBM3 memory. The RTX A5000 has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Can I find GH200 and RTX A5000 GPUs available to rent right now?

Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.

What is the main difference between the GH200 and the RTX A5000?

The GH200 uses the Hopper architecture (2023) while the RTX A5000 uses Ampere (2021). The GH200 delivers 71.2x the FP16 throughput and 5.2x the memory bandwidth of the RTX A5000.