GH200 vs MI300X

HoppervsCDNA 3Updated 40 days ago

GH200 emerges as the winner for dominant AI training use cases: 1979 TFLOPS FP16 outperforms MI300X's 1307 TFLOPS, accelerating model convergence. Immediate cloud access at $1.99 per hour trumps MI300X's unavailability, prioritizing practical deployment over memory advantages in most scenarios.

GH200 from $1.99/hrMI300X from $1.99/hr

Specifications Compared

SpecGH200MI300X
TDP900W750W
VRAM96 GB192 GB
CUDA Cores16,896
Memory TypeHBM3HBM3
ArchitectureHopperCDNA 3
Form FactorsSXMOAM
InterconnectNVLink-C2C, PCIe 5.0Infinity Fabric, PCIe 5.0
Tensor Cores528
FP8 Performance3,958 TFLOPS2,614 TFLOPS
FP16 Performance1,979 TFLOPS1,307 TFLOPS
FP32 Performance67 TFLOPS163 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance34 TFLOPS81.7 TFLOPS
INT8 Performance3,958 TOPS2,614 TOPS
Memory Bandwidth4,000 GB/s5,300 GB/s

Performance Analysis

Peak FP16 throughput defines training efficiency: GH200's 1979 TFLOPS surpasses MI300X's 1307 TFLOPS, enabling faster convergence in transformer model training. FP8 at 3958 TFLOPS on GH200 supports quantized inference workloads better than MI300X's 2614 TFLOPS. However, MI300X's 163 TFLOPS FP32 outperforms GH200's 67 TFLOPS, benefiting simulation and rendering tasks requiring precise single-precision math.

Memory specifications impact batch sizes directly: MI300X's 192 GB HBM3 and 5300 GB/s bandwidth accommodate larger batches in memory-bound inference compared to GH200's 96 GB and 4000 GB/s. This allows MI300X to process models exceeding 100 billion parameters without excessive sharding. GH200's higher TDP of 900W versus 750W demands more cooling, potentially limiting density in racks.

Interconnects shape scalability: NVLink-C2C on GH200 facilitates low-latency CPU-GPU communication, ideal for hybrid workloads, while MI300X's Infinity Fabric excels in AMD ecosystem multi-GPU clusters. These differences translate to real-world trade-offs in throughput per watt and model scale.

Live Cloud Pricing

Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.

GH200

ProviderGPU ModelVRAMHost SpecsRegionPriceStatusAction
Vultr
Vultr
NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper
96GB VRAM
$1.99/GPU/hr
Available
Lambda Labs
Lambda Labs
NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper
96GB VRAM
$2.29/GPU/hr
Available
Denvr
Denvr
NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper
96GB VRAM
$3.87/GPU/hr
CoreWeave
CoreWeave
NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper
96GB VRAM
$6.50/GPU/hr

MI300X

ProviderGPU ModelVRAMHost SpecsRegionPriceStatusAction
RunPod
RunPod
AMD Instinct MI300X
192GB VRAM
$1.99/GPU/hr
Hot Aisle
Hot Aisle
AMD Instinct MI300X
192GB VRAM
$1.99/GPU/hr
Available
Cirrascale
Cirrascale
8×AMD Instinct MI300X
192GB VRAM
$3.08/GPU/hr
$24.64/hr total (8×)
Crusoe
Crusoe
AMD Instinct MI300X
192GB VRAM
$3.45/GPU/hr
Cirrascale
Cirrascale
8×AMD Instinct MI300X
192GB VRAM
$3.47/GPU/hr
$27.76/hr total (8×)

Compare real-time pricing across 25+ providers

When to Choose the GH200

GH200 suits high-throughput FP16 and FP8 workloads like LLM training: its 1979 TFLOPS FP16 and 3958 TFLOPS FP8 deliver superior speed over MI300X. Availability at $1.99 per hour across providers ensures immediate deployment, unlike MI300X's absent offers.

NVIDIA's NVLink-C2C and SXM form factor optimize multi-node scaling in established CUDA ecosystems, reducing development time for teams prioritizing raw compute.

When to Choose the MI300X

MI300X excels in memory-intensive scenarios: 192 GB HBM3 VRAM doubles GH200's 96 GB, supporting massive batch inference for models over 70B parameters. Higher 5300 GB/s bandwidth sustains throughput in bandwidth-limited tasks.

Lower 750W TDP versus 900W improves power efficiency, ideal for dense deployments, while 163 TFLOPS FP32 aids scientific computing beyond GH200's 67 TFLOPS.

Use Cases

LLM Training
GH200

GH200's 1979 TFLOPS FP16 exceeds MI300X's 1307 TFLOPS for faster training iterations. NVLink-C2C supports efficient scaling across nodes.

LLM Inference
MI300X

MI300X's 192 GB VRAM and 5300 GB/s bandwidth handle larger batches than GH200's 96 GB and 4000 GB/s. This reduces latency for serving massive models.

Fine-tuning
Either

Both offer strong FP16: GH200 at 1979 TFLOPS and MI300X at 1307 TFLOPS suit parameter-efficient tuning. Choice depends on model size and ecosystem.

Stable Diffusion
GH200

GH200's 3958 TFLOPS FP8 accelerates diffusion sampling over MI300X's 2614 TFLOPS. Higher peak compute benefits image generation throughput.

Scientific Computing
MI300X

MI300X's 163 TFLOPS FP32 outperforms GH200's 67 TFLOPS for simulations. Infinity Fabric aids multi-GPU HPC clusters.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which GPU has more VRAM, GH200 or MI300X?

MI300X provides 192 GB HBM3 VRAM, double GH200's 96 GB HBM3. This enables larger models on MI300X without model parallelism. Bandwidth follows suit at 5300 GB/s versus 4000 GB/s.

What is the FP16 performance of GH200 versus MI300X?

GH200 delivers 1979 TFLOPS FP16, higher than MI300X's 1307 TFLOPS. This advantage speeds LLM training on GH200. FP8 follows at 3958 TFLOPS for GH200 against 2614 TFLOPS.

How do power requirements compare?

MI300X requires 750W TDP, lower than GH200's 900W. This improves efficiency for MI300X in power-constrained environments. Density benefits arise from the difference.

Is GH200 available in the cloud?

GH200 offers start from $1.99 per hour across two providers, averaging $1.99 per hour. MI300X has no live cloud offers currently. This makes GH200 more accessible.

Which has better FP32 performance?

MI300X achieves 163 TFLOPS FP32, surpassing GH200's 67 TFLOPS. Scientific simulations favor MI300X for precision tasks. FP16 remains GH200's strength.

What interconnects do they use?

GH200 features NVLink-C2C and PCIe 5.0 for CPU-GPU links. MI300X uses Infinity Fabric and PCIe 5.0 for scaling. Both support high-speed clusters.

Which is cheaper to rent, the GH200 or the MI300X?

Cloud rental prices for both the GH200 and MI300X vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.

How much VRAM does the GH200 have compared to the MI300X?

The GH200 has 96 GB of HBM3 memory. The MI300X has 192 GB of HBM3 memory.

Can I find GH200 and MI300X GPUs available to rent right now?

Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.

What is the main difference between the GH200 and the MI300X?

The GH200 uses the Hopper architecture (2023) while the MI300X uses CDNA 3 (2023). The MI300X delivers 0.7x the FP16 throughput and 1.3x the memory bandwidth of the GH200.

GH200 vs MI300X: NVIDIA 96GB vs AMD 192GB | GPUPerHour