Specifications Compared
| Spec | B200 | TITAN-XP |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 1000W | 250W |
| VRAM | 192 GB | 12 GB |
| CUDA Cores | 18,432 | 3,840 |
| Memory Type | HBM3e | GDDR5X |
| Architecture | Blackwell | Pascal |
| Form Factors | SXM, NVL | PCIe |
| Interconnect | NVLink, PCIe 6.0, InfiniBand | |
| Tensor Cores | 576 | |
| FP8 Performance | 9,000 TFLOPS | |
| FP16 Performance | 4,500 TFLOPS | 12.1 TFLOPS |
| FP32 Performance | 90 TFLOPS | 12.1 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 45 TFLOPS | |
| INT8 Performance | 9,000 TOPS | |
| Memory Bandwidth | 8,000 GB/s | 548 GB/s |
Performance Analysis
B200's FP16 throughput of 4500 TFLOPS vastly exceeds TITAN Xp's 12.1 TFLOPS, accelerating AI training and inference where half-precision dominates. The FP32 figures reveal B200 at 90 TFLOPS compared to TITAN Xp's 12.1 TFLOPS: this gap enhances B200 for precision-sensitive tasks, though its FP16 emphasis suits mixed-precision workflows in deep learning frameworks.
Memory bandwidth disparities prove critical: B200's 8000 GB/s enables larger batch sizes in model training, minimizing data loading bottlenecks, whereas TITAN Xp's 548 GB/s constrains scalability for datasets exceeding 12 GB VRAM. In practice, B200's 192 GB capacity loads full large language models on a single GPU, reducing multi-device synchronization overhead absent in TITAN Xp's PCIe-only form factor.
Power demands reflect intent: B200's 1000W TDP supports sustained datacenter loads via NVLink and InfiniBand, outperforming TITAN Xp's 250W for consumer envelopes.
Live Cloud Pricing
Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.
B200 SXM
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Nebius | NVIDIA B200 SXM 192GB VRAM | 192GB | 20 vCPU 224GB RAM | 🌍Europe | $3.95/GPU/hr | |||
 Cirrascale | 8×NVIDIA B200 SXM 192GB VRAM | 192GB | 192 vCPU 2048GB RAM 43923GB Storage | United States | $4.79/GPU/hr $38.32/hr total (8×) | |||
Cirrascale | 8×NVIDIA B200 SXM 192GB VRAM | 192GB | 192 vCPU 2048GB RAM 43923GB Storage | United States | $5.39/GPU/hr $43.12/hr total (8×) | |||
Cirrascale | 8×NVIDIA B200 SXM 192GB VRAM | 192GB | 192 vCPU 2048GB RAM 43923GB Storage | United States | $5.69/GPU/hr $45.52/hr total (8×) | |||
 RunPod | NVIDIA B200 SXM 192GB VRAM | 192GB | 28 vCPU 283GB RAM | California | $5.89/GPU/hr |
When to Choose the B200 SXM
Data center operators prioritize the B200 for LLM training and inference: 192 GB HBM3e VRAM and 4500 TFLOPS FP16 handle models with billions of parameters without partitioning. Cloud deployments leverage its $1.71 per hour starting price and interconnects like NVLink for multi-GPU scaling.
High-throughput scientific simulations select B200, as 8000 GB/s bandwidth sustains large dataset processing beyond TITAN Xp capabilities.
When to Choose the TITAN Xp
Hobbyists with standard desktops opt for TITAN Xp: its 250W TDP integrates into consumer power supplies without modifications, and PCIe form factor simplifies local installations. Smaller-scale tasks like basic fine-tuning fit within 12 GB GDDR5X VRAM.
Users avoiding cloud costs choose TITAN Xp for on-premises gaming or legacy Pascal-optimized software, given no live cloud offers.
Use Cases
B200's 192 GB VRAM and 8000 GB/s bandwidth support massive batch sizes for billion-parameter models. TITAN Xp's 12 GB limits it to tiny subsets.
4500 TFLOPS FP16 on B200 accelerates high-concurrency serving. TITAN Xp's 12.1 TFLOPS FP16 cannot handle production-scale requests.
B200's 90 TFLOPS FP32 and FP8 at 9000 TFLOPS optimize parameter-efficient methods. TITAN Xp struggles with datasets beyond 12 GB.
B200's high bandwidth and VRAM enable high-resolution generations at scale. TITAN Xp suffices for basic 512x512 images but bottlenecks larger workflows.
B200's interconnects and 1000W TDP sustain complex simulations. TITAN Xp fits simple FP32 tasks at 12.1 TFLOPS.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the VRAM difference between NVIDIA B200 and TITAN Xp?▾
B200 provides 192 GB HBM3e VRAM, dwarfing TITAN Xp's 12 GB GDDR5X. This enables B200 to process models 16 times larger without offloading.
How do FP16 performances compare?▾
B200 delivers 4500 TFLOPS FP16, over 370 times TITAN Xp's 12.1 TFLOPS. Such superiority speeds AI inference by orders of magnitude.
What are the memory bandwidth specs?▾
B200 achieves 8000 GB/s, approximately 15 times TITAN Xp's 548 GB/s. Higher bandwidth on B200 reduces latency for data-intensive workloads.
Is cloud pricing available for these GPUs?▾
B200 SXM starts at $1.71 per hour with average $4.60 across 13 offers. TITAN Xp has no live cloud offers.
What are the power requirements?▾
B200 demands 1000W TDP for datacenter use, while TITAN Xp uses 250W suitable for desktops. B200 pairs with advanced cooling in SXM form.
Which architecture do they use?▾
B200 runs Blackwell from 2024 with FP8 at 9000 TFLOPS. TITAN Xp uses Pascal from 2017 with balanced 12.1 TFLOPS FP16 and FP32.
Which is cheaper to rent, the B200 or the TITAN Xp?▾
Cloud rental prices for both the B200 and TITAN Xp vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.
How much VRAM does the B200 have compared to the TITAN Xp?▾
The B200 has 192 GB of HBM3e memory. The TITAN Xp has 12 GB of GDDR5X memory.
Can I find B200 and TITAN Xp GPUs available to rent right now?▾
Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.
What is the main difference between the B200 and the TITAN Xp?▾
The B200 uses the Blackwell architecture (2024) while the TITAN Xp uses Pascal (2017). The B200 delivers 371.9x the FP16 throughput and 14.6x the memory bandwidth of the TITAN Xp.