Specifications Compared
| Spec | B200 | MI355X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 1000W | 750W |
| VRAM | 192 GB | 288 GB |
| CUDA Cores | 18,432 | |
| Memory Type | HBM3e | HBM3e |
| Architecture | Blackwell | CDNA 4 |
| Form Factors | SXM, NVL | OAM |
| Interconnect | NVLink, PCIe 6.0, InfiniBand | Infinity Fabric |
| Tensor Cores | 576 | |
| FP8 Performance | 9,000 TFLOPS | 4,600 TFLOPS |
| FP16 Performance | 4,500 TFLOPS | 2,300 TFLOPS |
| FP32 Performance | 90 TFLOPS | 2300 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 45 TFLOPS | 72 TFLOPS |
| INT8 Performance | 9,000 TOPS | 4,600 TOPS |
| Memory Bandwidth | 8,000 GB/s | 8,000 GB/s |
Performance Analysis
The B200 outperforms in low-precision computing critical for modern AI inference: its FP8 throughput reaches 9000 TFLOPS, double the MI355X's 4600 TFLOPS, enabling faster processing of quantized models. FP16 performance follows suit at 4500 TFLOPS for the B200 versus 2300 TFLOPS for the MI355X, benefiting training and fine-tuning phases that leverage half-precision arithmetic. However, the B200's FP32 rate drops to 90 TFLOPS, far below the MI355X's balanced 2300 TFLOPS, which suits precision-sensitive simulations. Equal memory bandwidth of 8000 GB/s ensures comparable data movement efficiency, but the MI355X's 288 GB VRAM supports larger batch sizes than the B200's 192 GB, reducing overhead in memory-constrained scenarios like multi-billion parameter model handling. Power draw differs at 1000W TDP for the B200 against 750W for the MI355X, impacting cooling and density in clusters.
Live Cloud Pricing
Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.
B200 SXM
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nebius | NVIDIA B200 SXM 192GB VRAM | 192GB | 20 vCPU 224GB RAM | 🌍Europe | $3.95/GPU/hr | |||
Cirrascale | 8×NVIDIA B200 SXM 192GB VRAM | 192GB | 192 vCPU 2048GB RAM 43923GB Storage | United States | $4.79/GPU/hr $38.32/hr total (8×) | |||
Cirrascale | 8×NVIDIA B200 SXM 192GB VRAM | 192GB | 192 vCPU 2048GB RAM 43923GB Storage | United States | $5.39/GPU/hr $43.12/hr total (8×) | |||
Cirrascale | 8×NVIDIA B200 SXM 192GB VRAM | 192GB | 192 vCPU 2048GB RAM 43923GB Storage | United States | $5.69/GPU/hr $45.52/hr total (8×) | |||
![]() RunPod | NVIDIA B200 SXM 192GB VRAM | 192GB | 28 vCPU 283GB RAM | California | $5.89/GPU/hr |
When to Choose the B200 SXM
Select the B200 for workloads prioritizing raw throughput in FP8 and FP16 formats. Its 9000 TFLOPS FP8 performance accelerates LLM inference, generating tokens twice as fast as the MI355X's 4600 TFLOPS. Availability from $1.71 per hour across 13 cloud offers allows immediate deployment without waiting for the 2025 MI355X release. NVLink and PCIe 6.0 interconnects enhance multi-GPU scaling in SXM form factor setups.
When to Choose the MI355X
The MI355X suits applications needing extensive VRAM or FP32 balance. Its 288 GB HBM3e capacity handles larger models or batches than the B200's 192 GB, ideal for memory-intensive training. Lower 750W TDP enables higher rack density compared to 1000W, and 2300 TFLOPS FP32 matches FP16 for scientific computing tasks.
Use Cases
The B200's 4500 TFLOPS FP16 exceeds the MI355X's 2300 TFLOPS, accelerating mixed-precision training loops. Despite lower VRAM at 192 GB versus 288 GB, higher compute sustains faster iterations for most models.
B200's 9000 TFLOPS FP8 doubles MI355X's 4600 TFLOPS, enabling superior token throughput in quantized serving. Cloud pricing from $1.71 per hour supports scalable production inference.
B200 favors speed with 4500 TFLOPS FP16, while MI355X's 288 GB VRAM manages larger datasets. Choice depends on model size versus compute priority.
Inference-heavy generation benefits from B200's 9000 TFLOPS FP8 over MI355X's 4600 TFLOPS. High memory bandwidth of 8000 GB/s matches on both, but superior low-precision perf wins.
MI355X's 2300 TFLOPS FP32 vastly outpaces B200's 90 TFLOPS for simulations. 288 GB VRAM further aids complex datasets.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which GPU has more VRAM?▾
The MI355X provides 288 GB HBM3e, exceeding the B200's 192 GB. This capacity supports larger models or batch sizes in training. Both share 8000 GB/s bandwidth.
What are the FP8 performance differences?▾
B200 achieves 9000 TFLOPS FP8, twice the MI355X's 4600 TFLOPS. This gap favors B200 in quantized inference tasks. FP16 follows at 4500 TFLOPS versus 2300 TFLOPS.
How do power consumptions compare?▾
MI355X draws 750W TDP, lower than B200's 1000W. Lower power aids dense deployments. Performance per watt varies by precision.
Is cloud pricing available for these GPUs?▾
B200 SXM starts at $1.71 per hour, averaging $4.60 per hour across 13 offers. MI355X has no live offers yet. B200 enables immediate access.
What interconnects do they support?▾
B200 uses NVLink, PCIe 6.0, and InfiniBand for multi-GPU links. MI355X relies on Infinity Fabric. Form factors differ: SXM/NVL for B200, OAM for MI355X.
Which is better for FP32 workloads?▾
MI355X delivers 2300 TFLOPS FP32, far above B200's 90 TFLOPS. It balances with FP16 at 2300 TFLOPS. B200 prioritizes low-precision formats.
Which is cheaper to rent, the B200 or the MI355X?▾
Cloud rental prices for both the B200 and MI355X vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.
How much VRAM does the B200 have compared to the MI355X?▾
The B200 has 192 GB of HBM3e memory. The MI355X has 288 GB of HBM3e memory.
Can I find B200 and MI355X GPUs available to rent right now?▾
Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.
What is the main difference between the B200 and the MI355X?▾
The B200 uses the Blackwell architecture (2024) while the MI355X uses CDNA 4 (2025). The B200 delivers 2.0x the FP16 throughput and 1.0x the memory bandwidth of the MI355X.
