B200 NVL vs MI355X

BlackwellvsCDNA 4Updated 35 days ago

NVIDIA B200 NVL emerges as the winner for prevalent AI use cases like LLM training and inference, driven by 4500 TFLOPS FP16 and 9000 TFLOPS FP8 that align with quantized models, plus current $10.50 per hour pricing and NVLink scalability. MI355X trails without live offers and lower low-precision compute.

B200 NVL from $3.95/hr

Specifications Compared

SpecB200MI355X
TDP1000W750W
VRAM192 GB288 GB
CUDA Cores18,432
Memory TypeHBM3eHBM3e
ArchitectureBlackwellCDNA 4
Form FactorsSXM, NVLOAM
InterconnectNVLink, PCIe 6.0, InfiniBandInfinity Fabric
Tensor Cores576
FP8 Performance9,000 TFLOPS4,600 TFLOPS
FP16 Performance4,500 TFLOPS2,300 TFLOPS
FP32 Performance90 TFLOPS2300 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance45 TFLOPS72 TFLOPS
INT8 Performance9,000 TOPS4,600 TOPS
Memory Bandwidth8,000 GB/s8,000 GB/s

Performance Analysis

The compute specifications reveal distinct strengths for AI pipelines. B200 NVL's 4500 TFLOPS FP16 and 9000 TFLOPS FP8 enable faster low-precision operations critical for LLM inference and training, potentially doubling throughput compared to MI355X's 2300 TFLOPS FP16 and 4600 TFLOPS FP8 in quantized workloads. However, MI355X's 2300 TFLOPS FP32 vastly outperforms B200 NVL's 90 TFLOPS, suiting FP32-dominant tasks like scientific computing or certain fine-tuning stages requiring higher precision.

Memory configurations impact scalability: MI355X's 288 GB VRAM supports larger batch sizes or models than B200 NVL's 192 GB, reducing swapping in memory-bound scenarios despite identical 8000 GB/s bandwidth. This bandwidth parity ensures comparable data throughput, but MI355X's lower 750W TDP versus 1000W allows denser racks, lowering cooling costs. Interconnects further differentiate: B200 NVL's NVLink and PCIe 6.0 excel in multi-GPU scaling, while MI355X's Infinity Fabric suits AMD ecosystems.

Live Cloud Pricing

Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.

B200 NVL

ProviderGPU ModelVRAMHost SpecsRegionPriceStatusAction
Nebius
Nebius
NVIDIA B200 SXM
192GB VRAM
$3.95/GPU/hr
Cirrascale
Cirrascale
8×NVIDIA B200 SXM
192GB VRAM
$4.79/GPU/hr
$38.32/hr total (8×)
Cirrascale
Cirrascale
8×NVIDIA B200 SXM
192GB VRAM
$5.39/GPU/hr
$43.12/hr total (8×)
Cirrascale
Cirrascale
8×NVIDIA B200 SXM
192GB VRAM
$5.69/GPU/hr
$45.52/hr total (8×)
RunPod
RunPod
NVIDIA B200 SXM
192GB VRAM
$5.89/GPU/hr

Compare real-time pricing across 25+ providers

When to Choose the B200 NVL

Opt for NVIDIA B200 NVL in low-precision AI inference and training where 9000 TFLOPS FP8 delivers superior speed over MI355X's 4600 TFLOPS. Its immediate availability at $10.50 per hour and NVLink interconnect make it ideal for NVIDIA-optimized clusters scaling to large LLM deployments with 4500 TFLOPS FP16 performance.

When to Choose the MI355X

Select AMD Instinct MI355X for FP32-heavy workloads benefiting from 2300 TFLOPS versus B200 NVL's 90 TFLOPS, such as simulations or legacy HPC codes. The 288 GB VRAM and 750W TDP enable larger models and efficient dense deployments in AMD environments via Infinity Fabric.

Use Cases

LLM Training
B200 NVL

B200 NVL's 4500 TFLOPS FP16 outperforms MI355X's 2300 TFLOPS for mixed-precision training common in LLMs. NVLink supports efficient multi-GPU scaling unavailable in MI355X.

LLM Inference
B200 NVL

9000 TFLOPS FP8 on B200 NVL accelerates quantized inference far beyond MI355X's 4600 TFLOPS. Immediate cloud access at $10.50 per hour suits production needs.

Fine-tuning
Either

B200 NVL excels in FP16 at 4500 TFLOPS for speed, while MI355X's 2300 TFLOPS FP32 aids precision-sensitive tuning. Choice depends on precision requirements.

Stable Diffusion
B200 NVL

B200 NVL's high FP16 and FP8 throughput handles generative diffusion models efficiently with 192 GB VRAM sufficient for most batches.

Scientific Computing
MI355X

MI355X's 2300 TFLOPS FP32 dominates B200 NVL's 90 TFLOPS for simulations. 288 GB VRAM supports complex datasets.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has more VRAM: B200 NVL or MI355X?

MI355X provides 288 GB HBM3e VRAM compared to B200 NVL's 192 GB. This enables MI355X to handle larger models without fragmentation.

What is the FP8 performance difference?

B200 NVL reaches 9000 TFLOPS FP8, nearly double MI355X's 4600 TFLOPS. This gap favors B200 NVL in quantized AI inference.

How do power consumptions compare?

MI355X uses 750W TDP versus B200 NVL's 1000W. Lower power on MI355X improves rack density and energy efficiency.

Is B200 NVL available in the cloud now?

Yes, NVIDIA B200 NVL offers start at $10.50 per hour across one live provider. MI355X has no current cloud listings.

Which is better for FP32 workloads?

MI355X delivers 2300 TFLOPS FP32 against B200 NVL's 90 TFLOPS. It suits HPC and scientific applications requiring full precision.

Do they have the same memory bandwidth?

Both achieve 8000 GB/s with HBM3e. This equality ensures similar performance in memory-intensive tasks.

Which is cheaper to rent, the B200 or the MI355X?

Cloud rental prices for both the B200 and MI355X vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.

How much VRAM does the B200 have compared to the MI355X?

The B200 has 192 GB of HBM3e memory. The MI355X has 288 GB of HBM3e memory.

Can I find B200 and MI355X GPUs available to rent right now?

Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.

What is the main difference between the B200 and the MI355X?

The B200 uses the Blackwell architecture (2024) while the MI355X uses CDNA 4 (2025). The B200 delivers 2.0x the FP16 throughput and 1.0x the memory bandwidth of the MI355X.

B200 NVL vs MI355X: NVIDIA 192GB vs AMD 288GB | GPUPerHour