Specifications Compared
| Spec | A40 | RTX-3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 170W |
| VRAM | 48 GB | 12 GB |
| CUDA Cores | 10,752 | 3,584 |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Form Factors | PCIe | PCIe |
| Interconnect | NVLink | |
| Tensor Cores | 336 | 112 |
| FP16 Performance | 37.4 TFLOPS | 12.7 TFLOPS |
| FP32 Performance | 37.4 TFLOPS | 12.7 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 0.6 TFLOPS | |
| INT8 Performance | 299 TOPS | |
| Memory Bandwidth | 696 GB/s | 360 GB/s |
Performance Analysis
The A40's 37.4 TFLOPS in FP16 and FP32 significantly outpaces the RTX 3060's 12.7 TFLOPS in both, translating to nearly three times faster matrix multiplications essential for deep learning. This delta means training neural networks completes quicker on the A40: for instance, epochs in large language model training process at higher throughput. The equal FP16 and FP32 rates on both GPUs suit mixed-precision training without penalties, but the A40's raw power accelerates convergence.
VRAM disparity proves critical: 48 GB on the A40 supports batch sizes up to four times larger than the RTX 3060's 12 GB limit, reducing overhead from gradient accumulation in memory-constrained scenarios. Higher memory bandwidth of 696 GB/s versus 360 GB/s on the A40 minimizes bottlenecks during inference, allowing sustained high throughput for serving multiple requests.
Power consumption reflects efficiency trade-offs: the A40's 300W TDP demands robust cooling compared to the RTX 3060's 170W, yet delivers proportional performance gains. In real-world benchmarks, these specs position the A40 for enterprise-scale AI, while the RTX 3060 handles prototyping effectively.
Live Cloud Pricing
Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.
A40
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() TensorDock | NVIDIA RTX A4000 16GB VRAM | 16GB | 0 vCPU 0GB RAM | Tallinn, Harjumaa | $0.08/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Vast.ai | 8×NVIDIA RTX A4000 16GB VRAM | 16GB | 80 vCPU 201GB RAM 1698GB Storage | United Kingdom | $0.15/GPU/hr $1.17/hr total (8×) | Available | ||
![]() Hyperstack | 4×NVIDIA RTX A4000 16GB VRAM | 16GB | 16 vCPU 86GB RAM 500GB Storage | Norway | $0.15/GPU/hr $0.60/hr total (4×) | Available | ||
![]() Hyperstack | NVIDIA RTX A4000 16GB VRAM | 16GB | 4 vCPU 21GB RAM 100GB Storage | Norway | $0.15/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Hyperstack | 2×NVIDIA RTX A4000 16GB VRAM | 16GB | 8 vCPU 43GB RAM 200GB Storage | Norway | $0.15/GPU/hr $0.30/hr total (2×) | Available |
RTX 3060
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Vast.ai | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB VRAM | 12GB | 36 vCPU 31GB RAM 862GB Storage | Texas | $0.23/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Vast.ai | 2×NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB VRAM | 12GB | 24 vCPU 55GB RAM 1940GB Storage | Texas | $0.23/GPU/hr $0.45/hr total (2×) | Available | ||
![]() Vast.ai | 2×NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB VRAM | 12GB | 128 vCPU 168GB RAM 715GB Storage | Texas | $0.23/GPU/hr $0.45/hr total (2×) | Available | ||
![]() Vast.ai | 2×NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB VRAM | 12GB | 64 vCPU 126GB RAM 3050GB Storage | Texas | $0.23/GPU/hr $0.45/hr total (2×) | Available |
When to Choose the A40
The A40 emerges as the superior choice for workloads demanding extensive memory: training large language models exceeding 12 GB VRAM or scientific simulations requiring 696 GB/s bandwidth. Its NVLink interconnect enables multi-GPU scaling absent on the RTX 3060, ideal for distributed training across nodes.
Professionals prioritizing 37.4 TFLOPS FP32 performance over cost select the A40, despite $1.26 per hour average pricing, for production inference serving high-volume queries without latency spikes.
When to Choose the RTX 3060
Budget-limited users opt for the RTX 3060 when tasks fit within 12 GB VRAM, such as fine-tuning small models or Stable Diffusion at 360 GB/s bandwidth. Its $0.07 per hour average cost across 12 offers suits experimentation and prototyping.
Lower 170W TDP makes the RTX 3060 preferable in power-constrained cloud instances, delivering adequate 12.7 TFLOPS for inference on lightweight networks without excessive rental fees.
Use Cases
The A40's 48 GB VRAM and 37.4 TFLOPS FP16 support large batch sizes and full model loading, unlike the RTX 3060's 12 GB limit. Its 696 GB/s bandwidth accelerates data throughput for extended training runs.
A40 handles high-concurrency inference with 37.4 TFLOPS and ample VRAM for multiple simultaneous requests. RTX 3060 suffices only for low-volume serving within 12 GB constraints.
RTX 3060 manages small model fine-tuning at 12.7 TFLOPS and low $0.07 per hour cost. A40 excels for parameter-heavy adapters needing 48 GB VRAM.
A40's 48 GB VRAM enables high-resolution generations without swapping, at 696 GB/s bandwidth. RTX 3060 limits outputs due to 12 GB capacity.
NVLink on A40 facilitates multi-GPU simulations with 37.4 TFLOPS FP32. RTX 3060 lacks interconnect and VRAM for complex datasets.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the VRAM difference between A40 and RTX 3060?▾
The A40 provides 48 GB GDDR6 VRAM, quadrupling the RTX 3060's 12 GB. This allows the A40 to load larger models without offloading. Bandwidth follows suit at 696 GB/s versus 360 GB/s.
Which GPU has higher compute performance?▾
A40 delivers 37.4 TFLOPS in FP16 and FP32, nearly three times the RTX 3060's 12.7 TFLOPS per precision. This boosts training and inference speeds proportionally. Both share Ampere architecture benefits.
How do cloud prices compare for A40 vs RTX 3060?▾
RTX 3060 starts at $0.03 per hour averaging $0.07 across 12 offers, far below A40's $0.24 starting and $1.26 average over 23 offers. Budget tasks favor RTX 3060 rentals. Enterprise needs justify A40 costs.
What are the TDP ratings?▾
A40 consumes 300W TDP, double the RTX 3060's 170W. Higher TDP correlates with A40's superior 37.4 TFLOPS output. Power limits influence cloud instance selection.
Does A40 support NVLink unlike RTX 3060?▾
A40 includes NVLink for multi-GPU connectivity, absent on RTX 3060. This enables efficient scaling for distributed workloads. PCIe form factor unites both for cloud use.
Which is better for AI training?▾
A40 outperforms with 48 GB VRAM and 696 GB/s bandwidth for large batches. RTX 3060 suits small-scale training at lower cost. Performance gap stems from 37.4 versus 12.7 TFLOPS.
Which is cheaper to rent, the A40 or the RTX 3060?▾
Cloud rental prices for both the A40 and RTX 3060 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.
How much VRAM does the A40 have compared to the RTX 3060?▾
The A40 has 48 GB of GDDR6 memory. The RTX 3060 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory.
Can I find A40 and RTX 3060 GPUs available to rent right now?▾
Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.
What is the main difference between the A40 and the RTX 3060?▾
The A40 uses the Ampere architecture (2020) while the RTX 3060 uses Ampere (2021). The A40 delivers 2.9x the FP16 throughput and 1.9x the memory bandwidth of the RTX 3060.


