A30 vs RTX PRO 6000

AmperevsBlackwellUpdated 35 days ago

The RTX PRO 6000 emerges as the clear winner for most common AI and machine learning use cases. Its 96 GB VRAM, 1792 GB/s bandwidth, and 125 TFLOPS compute vastly outperform the A30's 24 GB, 933 GB/s, and 10.3 TFLOPS, enabling larger models and faster training or inference. Cloud availability at $0.59 per hour further solidifies its position over the unavailable A30.

Specifications Compared

SpecA30RTX-PRO-6000-BLACKWELL
TDP165W400W
VRAM24 GB96 GB
CUDA Cores3,58421,760
Memory TypeHBM2GDDR7
ArchitectureAmpereBlackwell
Form FactorsPCIePCIe
InterconnectNVLinkNVLink
Tensor Cores224680
FP16 Performance10.3 TFLOPS125 TFLOPS
FP32 Performance10.3 TFLOPS125 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance5.2 TFLOPS
INT8 Performance165 TOPS2,000 TOPS
Memory Bandwidth933 GB/s1,792 GB/s

Performance Analysis

Compute performance shows a stark contrast: the RTX PRO 6000 achieves 125 TFLOPS in FP16 and FP32, dwarfing the A30's 10.3 TFLOPS by a factor of over 12 times. This delta translates to dramatically faster model training and inference; for instance, training a large language model would complete in roughly one-twelfth the time on the RTX PRO 6000. The identical FP16/FP32 ratios on both GPUs indicate balanced mixed-precision capabilities, but the RTX PRO 6000's FP8 at 2000 TFLOPS enables ultra-efficient inference for quantized models.

Memory capacity and bandwidth profoundly impact real-world usage. The RTX PRO 6000's 96 GB GDDR7 VRAM supports models up to four times larger than the A30's 24 GB HBM2 limit, ideal for billion-parameter LLMs. Bandwidth at 1792 GB/s versus 933 GB/s nearly doubles data throughput, allowing larger batch sizes without memory bottlenecks; for example, inference batches could increase by 50 percent or more on the newer GPU.

Power draw differs at 400W TDP for the RTX PRO 6000 against 165W for the A30, reflecting higher performance density. While the A30 offers better efficiency per watt at 62.4 GFLOPS/W, the RTX PRO 6000 prioritizes raw speed for throughput-oriented tasks.

Live Cloud Pricing

Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.

No live offers available at this time.

Compare real-time pricing across 25+ providers

When to Choose the A30

The A30 excels in scenarios with modest memory needs under 24 GB VRAM and lower power budgets at 165W TDP. It suits legacy Ampere-optimized software or on-premises setups where cloud pricing is irrelevant, as no live offers exist currently. Developers handling smaller datasets or fine-tuning mid-sized models benefit from its 933 GB/s bandwidth without overprovisioning.

Cost-conscious users avoiding high TDP cooling costs prefer the A30 for prototyping or scientific simulations not demanding over 10.3 TFLOPS.

When to Choose the RTX PRO 6000

The RTX PRO 6000 dominates large-scale AI workloads requiring 96 GB VRAM and 125 TFLOPS FP16/FP32 performance. Its availability at $0.59 per hour average $1.25 per hour across five providers makes it ideal for cloud-based training of massive LLMs or high-throughput inference with 2000 TFLOPS FP8.

Users needing 1792 GB/s bandwidth for large batch sizes in production deployments choose this GPU, especially with Blackwell optimizations for 2025-era software.

Use Cases

LLM Training
RTX PRO 6000

The RTX PRO 6000's 96 GB VRAM and 125 TFLOPS FP16 handle massive models and large batches, far beyond the A30's 24 GB and 10.3 TFLOPS limits.

LLM Inference
RTX PRO 6000

2000 TFLOPS FP8 on the RTX PRO 6000 delivers ultra-fast quantized inference, with 1792 GB/s bandwidth supporting high throughput versus the A30's 10.3 TFLOPS.

Fine-tuning
RTX PRO 6000

96 GB VRAM accommodates larger parameter counts during fine-tuning, and 125 TFLOPS speeds iterations compared to the A30's 24 GB constraint.

Stable Diffusion
RTX PRO 6000

High memory bandwidth at 1792 GB/s and 96 GB VRAM enable bigger image batches and resolutions on the RTX PRO 6000 over the A30's 933 GB/s.

Scientific Computing
Either

The A30 suffices for FP32-bound tasks under 10.3 TFLOPS with 165W efficiency, but the RTX PRO 6000 excels in memory-intensive simulations needing 96 GB.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which GPU has more VRAM?

The RTX PRO 6000 offers 96 GB GDDR7 VRAM, quadrupling the A30's 24 GB HBM2. This enables handling of much larger models without swapping.

What is the performance difference in TFLOPS?

RTX PRO 6000 delivers 125 TFLOPS FP16/FP32 and 2000 TFLOPS FP8, versus A30's 10.3 TFLOPS FP16/FP32. This provides over 12x compute uplift.

How does memory bandwidth compare?

RTX PRO 6000 bandwidth reaches 1792 GB/s, almost double the A30's 933 GB/s. Higher bandwidth supports larger batch sizes in training.

What are the power requirements?

A30 TDP is 165W, while RTX PRO 6000 requires 400W. The A30 suits lower-power environments.

Is cloud pricing available for these GPUs?

RTX PRO 6000 starts at $0.59 per hour, averaging $1.25 per hour across five offers. A30 has no live cloud offers.

Which is newer?

RTX PRO 6000 uses 2025 Blackwell architecture, succeeding A30's 2021 Ampere. Blackwell brings FP8 support at 2000 TFLOPS.

Which is cheaper to rent, the A30 or the RTX PRO 6000?

Cloud rental prices for both the A30 and RTX PRO 6000 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.

How much VRAM does the A30 have compared to the RTX PRO 6000?

The A30 has 24 GB of HBM2 memory. The RTX PRO 6000 has 96 GB of GDDR7 memory.

Can I find A30 and RTX PRO 6000 GPUs available to rent right now?

Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.

What is the main difference between the A30 and the RTX PRO 6000?

The A30 uses the Ampere architecture (2021) while the RTX PRO 6000 uses Blackwell (2025). The RTX PRO 6000 delivers 12.1x the FP16 throughput and 1.9x the memory bandwidth of the A30.