Specifications Compared
| Spec | A16 | RTX-2070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 175W |
| VRAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| CUDA Cores | 2,560 | 2,304 |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Form Factors | PCIe | PCIe |
| Interconnect | NVLink | |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 288 |
| FP16 Performance | 4.5 TFLOPS | 7.5 TFLOPS |
| FP32 Performance | 4.5 TFLOPS | 7.5 TFLOPS |
| Memory Bandwidth | 231 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Performance Analysis
The RTX 2070 SUPER demonstrates stronger raw compute capability with 9 TFLOPS in both FP16 and FP32, doubling the A16's 4.5 TFLOPS: this translates to faster model training and inference in compute-bound workloads like fine-tuning transformers. The identical FP16 to FP32 ratio on both GPUs supports efficient mixed-precision training without bottlenecks in either precision.
Higher memory bandwidth on the RTX 2070 SUPER at 448 GB/s versus 231 GB/s on the A16 allows for larger batch sizes in memory-intensive tasks such as Stable Diffusion generation, reducing latency. The A16 counters with 16 GB VRAM against 8 GB, accommodating bigger datasets or higher resolutions in inference without swapping to system RAM. Overall, the RTX 2070 SUPER excels in speed for small-to-medium workloads, while the A16 suits VRAM-heavy scenarios.
Live Cloud Pricing
Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.
A16
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vultr | 8×NVIDIA A16 64GB VRAM | 64GB | 48 vCPU 496GB RAM 1500GB Storage | Singapore | $0.47/GPU/hr $3.77/hr total (8×) | Available | ||
Vultr | 8×NVIDIA A16 64GB VRAM | 64GB | 48 vCPU 496GB RAM 1500GB Storage | Atlanta | $0.47/GPU/hr $3.77/hr total (8×) | Available | ||
Vultr | 8×NVIDIA A16 64GB VRAM | 64GB | 48 vCPU 496GB RAM 1500GB Storage | Bangalore | $0.47/GPU/hr $3.77/hr total (8×) | Available | ||
Vultr | 2×NVIDIA A16 64GB VRAM | 64GB | 12 vCPU 128GB RAM 700GB Storage | Bangalore | $0.47/GPU/hr $0.94/hr total (2×) | Available | ||
Vultr | 4×NVIDIA A16 64GB VRAM | 64GB | 24 vCPU 256GB RAM 1200GB Storage | Atlanta | $0.47/GPU/hr $1.88/hr total (4×) | Available |
When to Choose the A16
Opt for the A16 in cloud environments requiring ample VRAM: its 16 GB GDDR6 handles large language model inference or multi-user VDI sessions effectively. At $0.47 per hour average pricing across 77 offers, it provides economical access without upfront hardware costs, ideal for scalable deployments.
The PCIe form factor and 250 W TDP integrate seamlessly into data centers for graphics virtualization.
When to Choose the RTX 2070 SUPER
Choose the RTX 2070 SUPER for on-premises setups needing peak performance: 9 TFLOPS FP32 outperforms the A16's 4.5 TFLOPS in gaming, content creation, or compute-limited AI tasks. Superior 448 GB/s bandwidth supports high-throughput rendering or training with modest batch sizes.
Its lower 215 W TDP suits desktop workstations where power efficiency matters and no cloud dependency exists.
Use Cases
RTX 2070 SUPER's 9 TFLOPS FP32 doubles A16's 4.5 TFLOPS for faster training iterations. Higher 448 GB/s bandwidth supports efficient gradient computations.
A16's 16 GB VRAM accommodates larger LLMs without quantization compared to 8 GB on RTX 2070 SUPER. Cloud pricing at $0.47/hr enables scalable serving.
RTX 2070 SUPER delivers 9 TFLOPS FP16 for quicker fine-tuning passes versus A16's 4.5 TFLOPS. Suitable for on-prem with 448 GB/s bandwidth.
RTX 2070 SUPER's higher 448 GB/s bandwidth and 9 TFLOPS compute generate images faster than A16's 231 GB/s and 4.5 TFLOPS.
A16's 16 GB VRAM aids large simulations; RTX 2070 SUPER's 9 TFLOPS FP32 accelerates matrix operations. Choice depends on cloud needs versus local perf.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which GPU has more VRAM, A16 or RTX 2070 SUPER?▾
The A16 provides 16 GB GDDR6 VRAM, double the 8 GB on the RTX 2070 SUPER. This benefits memory-intensive tasks like large model inference. Bandwidth differs at 231 GB/s for A16 versus 448 GB/s.
Is the RTX 2070 SUPER faster than the A16?▾
The RTX 2070 SUPER achieves 9 TFLOPS in FP16 and FP32, outperforming the A16's 4.5 TFLOPS. It suits compute-heavy workloads. A16 offers cloud availability at $0.47/hr.
What is the power consumption of these GPUs?▾
A16 draws 250 W TDP, while RTX 2070 SUPER uses 215 W. Both fit PCIe slots. Lower TDP on SUPER aids desktop efficiency.
Does the A16 have cloud pricing?▾
A16 starts at $0.47 per hour, averaging $0.48 across 77 offers. RTX 2070 SUPER has no live cloud listings. This makes A16 preferable for rentals.
How do architectures compare?▾
A16 uses Ampere from 2021 with 4.5 TFLOPS FP32; RTX 2070 SUPER employs Turing from 2018 at 9 TFLOPS FP32. Ampere improves efficiency for pro tasks.
Which is better for batch processing?▾
RTX 2070 SUPER's 448 GB/s bandwidth handles larger batches than A16's 231 GB/s. A16's 16 GB VRAM supports bigger overall datasets.
Which is cheaper to rent, the A16 or the RTX 2070?▾
Cloud rental prices for both the A16 and RTX 2070 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.
How much VRAM does the A16 have compared to the RTX 2070?▾
The A16 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. The RTX 2070 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.
Can I find A16 and RTX 2070 GPUs available to rent right now?▾
Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.
What is the main difference between the A16 and the RTX 2070?▾
The A16 uses the Ampere architecture (2021) while the RTX 2070 uses Turing (2018). The RTX 2070 delivers 1.7x the FP16 throughput and 1.9x the memory bandwidth of the A16.