Specifications Compared
| Spec | A100 | RTX-4090 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 400W | 450W |
| VRAM | 40-80 GB | 24 GB |
| CUDA Cores | 6,912 | 16,384 |
| Memory Type | HBM2e | GDDR6X |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Form Factors | SXM4, PCIe | PCIe |
| Interconnect | NVLink, PCIe 4.0, InfiniBand | PCIe 4.0 |
| Tensor Cores | 432 | 512 |
| FP16 Performance | 312 TFLOPS | 165 TFLOPS |
| FP32 Performance | 19.5 TFLOPS | 82.6 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 9.7 TFLOPS | 1.3 TFLOPS |
| INT8 Performance | 624 TOPS | 660 TOPS |
| Memory Bandwidth | 2,039 GB/s | 1,008 GB/s |
Performance Analysis
Memory capacity and bandwidth form the core performance divide: the A100 SXM4 80GB's 80 GB HBM2e and 2039 GB/s enable larger batch sizes in training large models, reducing overhead in memory-bound tasks like transformer inference. The RTX 4090's 24 GB GDDR6X and 1008 GB/s limit it to smaller batches, potentially slowing workflows with datasets exceeding 24 GB. This gap proves critical for LLM training, where high bandwidth sustains data flow across epochs.
FP16 and FP32 metrics reveal workload-specific strengths. The A100 excels in FP16 at 312 TFLOPS, ideal for training deep neural networks where mixed precision accelerates convergence without accuracy loss. Conversely, the RTX 4090's 82.6 TFLOPS FP32 and 660 TFLOPS FP8 favor inference pipelines or scientific simulations requiring full precision, offering up to four times the A100's FP32 rate. Power draw differs slightly at 400W for A100 versus 450W for RTX 4090, influencing dense cluster efficiency.
Interconnects amplify scalability: A100 supports NVLink and InfiniBand for multi-GPU setups, minimizing latency in distributed training across nodes. RTX 4090 relies solely on PCIe 4.0, suiting single-GPU or small-scale PCIe clusters but faltering in large-scale HPC.
Live Cloud Pricing
Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.
A100 SXM4 80GB
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Vast.ai | 2×NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 256 vCPU 126GB RAM 794GB Storage | Slovenia | $0.73/GPU/hr $1.47/hr total (2×) | Available | ||
![]() LeaderGPU | 8×NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 64 vCPU 384GB RAM 2000GB Storage | Netherlands | $0.90/GPU/hr $7.20/hr total (8×) | Available | ||
![]() Vast.ai | 2×NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 64 vCPU 126GB RAM 1114GB Storage | Czechia | $1.00/GPU/hr $2.00/hr total (2×) | Available | ||
![]() Vast.ai | NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 64 vCPU 63GB RAM 646GB Storage | Czechia | $1.07/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Denvr | 4×NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 64 vCPU 512GB RAM 7600GB Storage | Virginia | $1.15/GPU/hr $4.60/hr total (4×) |
RTX 4090
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() TensorDock | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB VRAM | 24GB | 0 vCPU 0GB RAM | Chubbuck, Idaho | $0.39/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() TensorDock | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB VRAM | 24GB | 0 vCPU 0GB RAM | Orlando, Florida | $0.48/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Vast.ai | 4×NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB VRAM | 24GB | 96 vCPU 472GB RAM 3034GB Storage | Sweden | $0.53/GPU/hr $2.13/hr total (4×) | Available | ||
![]() Vast.ai | 4×NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB VRAM | 24GB | 80 vCPU 157GB RAM 856GB Storage | United Kingdom | $0.67/GPU/hr $2.67/hr total (4×) | Available | ||
![]() Vast.ai | 4×NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB VRAM | 24GB | 256 vCPU 252GB RAM 448GB Storage | United Kingdom | $0.67/GPU/hr $2.67/hr total (4×) | Available |
When to Choose the A100 SXM4 80GB
The A100 SXM4 80GB suits enterprise-scale AI training and HPC simulations demanding 80 GB VRAM and 2039 GB/s bandwidth. It excels in multi-GPU environments via NVLink and InfiniBand, enabling efficient scaling for LLMs with billions of parameters where batch sizes exceed 24 GB limits of alternatives. Datacenter reliability and 312 TFLOPS FP16 make it the choice for production workloads prioritizing throughput over cost.
When to Choose the RTX 4090
The RTX 4090 fits budget-driven prototyping, inference, and creative tasks like Stable Diffusion, leveraging 82.6 TFLOPS FP32 and 660 TFLOPS FP8 at lower costs from $0.16 per hour average $0.45 per hour across 132 offers. Its Ada Lovelace architecture and PCIe form factor support single-GPU setups or gaming-hybrid workflows, where 24 GB VRAM suffices and higher availability trumps enterprise features.
Use Cases
A100's 80 GB VRAM and 2039 GB/s bandwidth support massive batch sizes for training large language models. RTX 4090's 24 GB limits scalability in multi-billion parameter models.
RTX 4090's 660 TFLOPS FP8 and lower $0.45 per hour average cost optimize high-throughput inference. A100 suits only if VRAM exceeds 24 GB requirements.
A100's 312 TFLOPS FP16 and NVLink enable efficient distributed fine-tuning on large datasets. RTX 4090 struggles with memory bandwidth at 1008 GB/s.
RTX 4090's Ada Lovelace architecture and 82.6 TFLOPS FP32 accelerate image generation tasks cost-effectively. Its 132 cloud offers provide better availability than A100's 30.
A100's InfiniBand support and 400W TDP fit HPC clusters for simulations needing high FP16 at 312 TFLOPS. RTX 4090 lacks enterprise interconnects.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which GPU has more VRAM?▾
The A100 SXM4 80GB offers 80 GB HBM2e VRAM, compared to the RTX 4090's 24 GB GDDR6X. This makes A100 better for memory-intensive tasks like large model training.
Is the RTX 4090 faster in FP32?▾
RTX 4090 achieves 82.6 TFLOPS in FP32, over four times the A100's 19.5 TFLOPS. It suits full-precision inference or simulations requiring higher single-precision rates.
What are the cloud pricing differences?▾
RTX 4090 starts at $0.16 per hour averaging $0.45 per hour across 132 offers, while A100 SXM4 80GB begins at $0.13 per hour averaging $1.27 per hour over 30 offers. RTX 4090 provides more affordable and abundant options.
Which has higher memory bandwidth?▾
A100 delivers 2039 GB/s bandwidth with HBM2e, doubling RTX 4090's 1008 GB/s GDDR6X. Higher bandwidth on A100 supports larger batches in training.
Can RTX 4090 scale like A100 in multi-GPU?▾
A100 uses NVLink and InfiniBand for low-latency multi-GPU scaling, unlike RTX 4090's PCIe 4.0 only. A100 excels in distributed computing clusters.
What are the TDPs?▾
A100 consumes 400W TDP, slightly less than RTX 4090's 450W. This favors A100 in power-efficient datacenter deployments.
Which is cheaper to rent, the A100 or the RTX 4090?▾
Cloud rental prices for both the A100 and RTX 4090 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.
How much VRAM does the A100 have compared to the RTX 4090?▾
The A100 has 40 to 80 GB of HBM2e memory. The RTX 4090 has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory.
Can I find A100 and RTX 4090 GPUs available to rent right now?▾
Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.
What is the main difference between the A100 and the RTX 4090?▾
The A100 uses the Ampere architecture (2020) while the RTX 4090 uses Ada Lovelace (2022). The A100 delivers 1.9x the FP16 throughput and 2.0x the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4090.



