Specifications Compared
| Spec | A100 | MI300X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 400W | 750W |
| VRAM | 40-80 GB | 192 GB |
| CUDA Cores | 6,912 | |
| Memory Type | HBM2e | HBM3 |
| Architecture | Ampere | CDNA 3 |
| Form Factors | SXM4, PCIe | OAM |
| Interconnect | NVLink, PCIe 4.0, InfiniBand | Infinity Fabric, PCIe 5.0 |
| Tensor Cores | 432 | |
| FP16 Performance | 312 TFLOPS | 1,307 TFLOPS |
| FP32 Performance | 19.5 TFLOPS | 163 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 9.7 TFLOPS | 81.7 TFLOPS |
| INT8 Performance | 624 TOPS | 2,614 TOPS |
| Memory Bandwidth | 2,039 GB/s | 5,300 GB/s |
Performance Analysis
The MI300X outperforms the A100 significantly in compute metrics relevant to AI tasks: its FP16 throughput reaches 1307 TFLOPS compared to 312 TFLOPS, enabling four times faster mixed-precision training for deep learning models. FP32 performance shows an even larger gap at 163 TFLOPS versus 19.5 TFLOPS, benefiting scientific simulations and precise inference where single-precision accuracy matters. The addition of FP8 at 2614 TFLOPS on the MI300X accelerates quantized inference for large language models, reducing latency in production deployments.
Memory specifications define real-world scalability: the MI300X's 192 GB HBM3 and 5300 GB/s bandwidth support batch sizes up to 2.4 times larger than the A100's 80 GB HBM2e at 2039 GB/s, minimizing data transfer bottlenecks during training of models exceeding 70 billion parameters. Higher bandwidth sustains peak utilization in memory-bound workloads like transformer inference. The A100's lower 400 W TDP versus 750 W allows denser packing in clusters, though at reduced per-GPU performance.
Live Cloud Pricing
Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.
A100 SXM4 80GB
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Vast.ai | 2×NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 256 vCPU 126GB RAM 794GB Storage | Slovenia | $0.73/GPU/hr $1.47/hr total (2×) | Available | ||
![]() LeaderGPU | 8×NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 64 vCPU 384GB RAM 2000GB Storage | Netherlands | $0.90/GPU/hr $7.20/hr total (8×) | Available | ||
![]() Vast.ai | 2×NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 64 vCPU 126GB RAM 1114GB Storage | Czechia | $1.00/GPU/hr $2.00/hr total (2×) | Available | ||
![]() Vast.ai | NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 64 vCPU 63GB RAM 646GB Storage | Czechia | $1.07/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Denvr | 4×NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 64 vCPU 512GB RAM 7600GB Storage | Virginia | $1.15/GPU/hr $4.60/hr total (4×) |
MI300X
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() RunPod | AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB VRAM | 192GB | 24 vCPU 256GB RAM | 🌍global | $1.99/GPU/hr | |||
![]() Hot Aisle | AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB VRAM | 192GB | 8 vCPU 224GB RAM 12288GB Storage | Michigan | $1.99/GPU/hr | Available | ||
Cirrascale | 8×AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB VRAM | 192GB | 192 vCPU 2355GB RAM 44538GB Storage | United States | $3.08/GPU/hr $24.64/hr total (8×) | |||
![]() Crusoe | AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB VRAM | 192GB | 0 vCPU 0GB RAM | United States | $3.45/GPU/hr | |||
Cirrascale | 8×AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB VRAM | 192GB | 192 vCPU 2355GB RAM 44538GB Storage | United States | $3.47/GPU/hr $27.76/hr total (8×) |
When to Choose the A100 SXM4 80GB
Opt for the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80GB in cost-sensitive environments or where NVIDIA's mature CUDA ecosystem ensures seamless integration. With cloud pricing from $0.45 per hour and an average of $1.39 across 23 offers, it provides strong value for workloads fitting within 80 GB VRAM, such as fine-tuning models up to 30 billion parameters. Lower 400 W TDP suits air-cooled data centers, and NVLink interconnects enable efficient multi-GPU scaling in established NVIDIA clusters.
When to Choose the MI300X
Select the AMD Instinct MI300X for cutting-edge AI training and inference demanding massive memory and compute. Its 192 GB HBM3 VRAM handles models over 100 billion parameters without model parallelism, while 5300 GB/s bandwidth supports large batch sizes in transformer training. Despite higher average pricing at $2.63 per hour across 9 offers, FP16 at 1307 TFLOPS and FP8 at 2614 TFLOPS deliver superior throughput for next-generation workloads.
Use Cases
The MI300X's 1307 TFLOPS FP16 and 192 GB VRAM outperform the A100's 312 TFLOPS and 80 GB, supporting larger models and batch sizes without sharding.
FP8 performance at 2614 TFLOPS on the MI300X accelerates quantized serving, paired with 5300 GB/s bandwidth for high-throughput requests versus the A100's limits.
A100 suffices for models under 30B parameters at lower $1.39/hr average cost; MI300X excels for larger ones with 163 TFLOPS FP32.
MI300X's higher FP16 at 1307 TFLOPS speeds image generation batches, with 192 GB VRAM handling high-resolution pipelines better than A100's 80 GB.
Superior FP32 at 163 TFLOPS versus 19.5 TFLOPS makes MI300X ideal for simulations; 5300 GB/s bandwidth reduces bottlenecks in data-intensive HPC.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which GPU has more VRAM: A100 SXM4 80GB or MI300X?▾
The MI300X provides 192 GB HBM3 VRAM, exceeding the A100 SXM4 80GB's 80 GB HBM2e. This enables handling of larger models without partitioning. Bandwidth follows suit at 5300 GB/s versus 2039 GB/s.
How do FP16 performances compare between A100 and MI300X?▾
MI300X achieves 1307 TFLOPS in FP16, over four times the A100's 312 TFLOPS. This translates to faster AI training cycles. FP32 shows 163 TFLOPS versus 19.5 TFLOPS.
What are the cloud pricing differences for these GPUs?▾
A100 SXM4 80GB starts at $0.45 per hour with 23 offers averaging $1.39. MI300X begins at $0.50 per hour across 9 offers averaging $2.63. Availability favors A100.
Which has lower power consumption?▾
The A100 SXM4 80GB draws 400 W TDP, half the MI300X's 750 W. This suits dense, power-limited clusters. Performance per watt favors MI300X in compute-heavy tasks.
Does MI300X support FP8, and how does it compare?▾
MI300X offers 2614 TFLOPS in FP8 for efficient inference, absent on A100. This boosts quantized LLM serving speeds. FP16 remains strong at 1307 TFLOPS.
What interconnects do these GPUs use?▾
A100 employs NVLink, PCIe 4.0, and InfiniBand; MI300X uses Infinity Fabric and PCIe 5.0. Both enable high-speed multi-GPU communication. Form factors differ: SXM4 for A100, OAM for MI300X.
Which is cheaper to rent, the A100 or the MI300X?▾
Cloud rental prices for both the A100 and MI300X vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.
How much VRAM does the A100 have compared to the MI300X?▾
The A100 has 40 to 80 GB of HBM2e memory. The MI300X has 192 GB of HBM3 memory.
Can I find A100 and MI300X GPUs available to rent right now?▾
Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.
What is the main difference between the A100 and the MI300X?▾
The A100 uses the Ampere architecture (2020) while the MI300X uses CDNA 3 (2023). The MI300X delivers 4.2x the FP16 throughput and 2.6x the memory bandwidth of the A100.





