Specifications Compared
| Spec | A100 | RTX-5090 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 400W | 575W |
| VRAM | 40-80 GB | 32 GB |
| CUDA Cores | 6,912 | 21,760 |
| Memory Type | HBM2e | GDDR7 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell |
| Form Factors | SXM4, PCIe | PCIe |
| Interconnect | NVLink, PCIe 4.0, InfiniBand | PCIe 5.0 |
| Tensor Cores | 432 | 680 |
| FP16 Performance | 312 TFLOPS | 419 TFLOPS |
| FP32 Performance | 19.5 TFLOPS | 105 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 9.7 TFLOPS | 1.6 TFLOPS |
| INT8 Performance | 624 TOPS | 838 TOPS |
| Memory Bandwidth | 2,039 GB/s | 1,792 GB/s |
Performance Analysis
Compute throughput differences highlight distinct strengths: the RTX 5090 achieves 419 TFLOPS in FP16 versus the A100's 312 TFLOPS, accelerating half-precision training and inference for large language models. Its FP32 performance reaches 105 TFLOPS compared to 19.5 TFLOPS, benefiting single-precision scientific simulations and graphics workloads. The FP8 rating of 838 TFLOPS on the RTX 5090 further optimizes low-precision inference tasks common in deployment.
Memory specifications impact real-world scalability: the A100 PCIe 80GB's 80 GB HBM2e VRAM supports larger batch sizes and models exceeding 32 GB, such as massive transformers, while its 2039 GB/s bandwidth reduces bottlenecks in data-heavy operations. The RTX 5090's 32 GB GDDR7 at 1792 GB/s suffices for mid-sized workloads but limits capacity for extensive datasets. Higher TDP of 575W on the RTX 5090 versus 400W demands more power infrastructure.
These deltas translate to trade-offs in efficiency: higher bandwidth on the A100 enables sustained performance in memory-bound training phases, whereas the RTX 5090's superior FLOPS ratios excel in compute-limited inference at lower costs.
Live Cloud Pricing
Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.
A100 PCIe 80GB
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Vast.ai | NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 256 vCPU 63GB RAM 2826GB Storage | Slovenia | $0.73/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Vast.ai | 2×NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 256 vCPU 126GB RAM 794GB Storage | Slovenia | $0.73/GPU/hr $1.47/hr total (2×) | Available | ||
![]() LeaderGPU | 8×NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 64 vCPU 384GB RAM 2000GB Storage | Netherlands | $0.90/GPU/hr $7.20/hr total (8×) | Available | ||
![]() Vast.ai | NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 64 vCPU 63GB RAM 646GB Storage | Czechia | $1.07/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Denvr | 8×NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 128 vCPU 1024GB RAM 15200GB Storage | Virginia | $1.15/GPU/hr $9.20/hr total (8×) |
RTX 5090
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() TensorDock | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 32GB VRAM | 32GB | 0 vCPU 0GB RAM | Chubbuck, Idaho | $0.57/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Vast.ai | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 32GB VRAM | 32GB | 384 vCPU 94GB RAM 570GB Storage | Czechia | $0.81/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Vast.ai | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 32GB VRAM | 32GB | 8 vCPU 30GB RAM 489GB Storage | South Korea | $0.87/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Vast.ai | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 32GB VRAM | 32GB | 16 vCPU 30GB RAM 583GB Storage | South Korea | $0.87/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Vast.ai | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 32GB VRAM | 32GB | 16 vCPU 30GB RAM 495GB Storage | South Korea | $0.91/GPU/hr | Available |
When to Choose the A100 PCIe 80GB
The A100 PCIe 80GB stands out for workloads demanding extensive VRAM: its 80 GB HBM2e capacity handles models over 32 GB, such as full-scale LLM training or scientific simulations with large datasets. NVLink interconnect supports multi-GPU scaling unavailable on the RTX 5090, ideal for distributed enterprise environments.
High memory bandwidth of 2039 GB/s ensures minimal latency in batch processing for production inference servers, justifying its $0.89 to $2.05 per hour pricing when capacity trumps raw compute.
When to Choose the RTX 5090
The RTX 5090 proves superior for cost-sensitive, high-throughput tasks: FP16 at 419 TFLOPS and FP32 at 105 TFLOPS outperform the A100's 312 TFLOPS and 19.5 TFLOPS, enhancing training speed and inference latency. FP8 performance of 838 TFLOPS optimizes quantized deployments.
At $0.13 per hour average $0.64, it delivers value for single-GPU setups in fine-tuning or creative AI, leveraging PCIe 5.0 and Blackwell efficiencies without needing datacenter-scale interconnects.
Use Cases
RTX 5090's 419 TFLOPS FP16 exceeds A100's 312 TFLOPS for faster half-precision training. Lower cost at $0.13 per hour average $0.64 enables scalable runs.
FP8 at 838 TFLOPS on RTX 5090 accelerates quantized inference beyond A100 capabilities. Pricing advantage supports high-volume deployments.
A100's 80 GB VRAM suits large models, while RTX 5090's 105 TFLOPS FP32 handles smaller ones efficiently. Choice depends on model size and budget.
RTX 5090's higher FP16 and FP32 performance speeds image generation. Consumer-oriented architecture aligns with creative workloads at lower $0.64 per hour average.
A100's 2039 GB/s bandwidth and 80 GB VRAM manage data-intensive simulations. NVLink enables multi-GPU precision tasks.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has more VRAM: A100 PCIe 80GB or RTX 5090?▾
The A100 PCIe 80GB provides 80 GB HBM2e VRAM, doubling the RTX 5090's 32 GB GDDR7. This supports larger models in training. Bandwidth favors A100 at 2039 GB/s over 1792 GB/s.
How do cloud prices compare for A100 and RTX 5090?▾
A100 PCIe 80GB starts at $0.89 per hour, averaging $2.05 across 29 offers. RTX 5090 begins at $0.13 per hour, averaging $0.64 over 27 offers. RTX offers better value for compute.
What is the FP16 performance difference?▾
RTX 5090 delivers 419 TFLOPS FP16 versus A100's 312 TFLOPS. This boosts AI training speed by about 34 percent. FP32 gap is larger at 105 TFLOPS versus 19.5 TFLOPS.
Does RTX 5090 support FP8?▾
RTX 5090 achieves 838 TFLOPS in FP8, absent on A100. This enhances low-precision inference efficiency. Blackwell architecture enables this capability.
Which has higher power consumption?▾
RTX 5090's TDP is 575W, exceeding A100's 400W. This impacts cooling and costs in dense deployments. A100 suits power-constrained setups.
Can A100 use NVLink with RTX 5090?▾
A100 supports NVLink for multi-GPU, while RTX 5090 relies on PCIe 5.0. No direct compatibility exists between them. A100 excels in scaled clusters.
Which is cheaper to rent, the A100 or the RTX 5090?▾
Cloud rental prices for both the A100 and RTX 5090 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.
How much VRAM does the A100 have compared to the RTX 5090?▾
The A100 has 40 to 80 GB of HBM2e memory. The RTX 5090 has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory.
Can I find A100 and RTX 5090 GPUs available to rent right now?▾
Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.
What is the main difference between the A100 and the RTX 5090?▾
The A100 uses the Ampere architecture (2020) while the RTX 5090 uses Blackwell (2025). The RTX 5090 delivers 1.3x the FP16 throughput and 1.1x the memory bandwidth of the A100.



