Specifications Compared
| Spec | A100 | MI300X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 400W | 750W |
| VRAM | 40-80 GB | 192 GB |
| CUDA Cores | 6,912 | |
| Memory Type | HBM2e | HBM3 |
| Architecture | Ampere | CDNA 3 |
| Form Factors | SXM4, PCIe | OAM |
| Interconnect | NVLink, PCIe 4.0, InfiniBand | Infinity Fabric, PCIe 5.0 |
| Tensor Cores | 432 | |
| FP16 Performance | 312 TFLOPS | 1,307 TFLOPS |
| FP32 Performance | 19.5 TFLOPS | 163 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 9.7 TFLOPS | 81.7 TFLOPS |
| INT8 Performance | 624 TOPS | 2,614 TOPS |
| Memory Bandwidth | 2,039 GB/s | 5,300 GB/s |
Performance Analysis
The MI300X demonstrates superior compute capabilities: its 1307 TFLOPS FP16 throughput quadruples the A100's 312 TFLOPS, accelerating deep learning training where half-precision dominates. FP32 performance of 163 TFLOPS on MI300X surpasses A100's 19.5 TFLOPS by over eight times, benefiting precision-sensitive tasks like simulations.
Memory specifications create real-world advantages for MI300X. With 192 GB HBM3 versus A100's 80 GB HBM2e, MI300X supports larger batch sizes in model training, reducing iterations and wall-clock time. The 5300 GB/s bandwidth, more than double A100's 2039 GB/s, minimizes data transfer bottlenecks during inference on massive datasets.
FP8 performance on MI300X reaches 2614 TFLOPS, enabling quantized inference at scales unattainable on A100. These metrics translate to faster epochs in training and higher throughput in serving, though power draw of 750W on MI300X demands robust infrastructure compared to A100's 400W.
Live Cloud Pricing
Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.
A100 PCIe 80GB
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Vast.ai | NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 256 vCPU 63GB RAM 2826GB Storage | Slovenia | $0.73/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Vast.ai | 2×NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 256 vCPU 126GB RAM 794GB Storage | Slovenia | $0.73/GPU/hr $1.47/hr total (2×) | Available | ||
![]() LeaderGPU | 8×NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 64 vCPU 384GB RAM 2000GB Storage | Netherlands | $0.90/GPU/hr $7.20/hr total (8×) | Available | ||
![]() Vast.ai | NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 64 vCPU 63GB RAM 557GB Storage | Czechia | $1.00/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Denvr | 8×NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 128 vCPU 1024GB RAM 15200GB Storage | Virginia | $1.15/GPU/hr $9.20/hr total (8×) |
MI300X
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() RunPod | AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB VRAM | 192GB | 24 vCPU 256GB RAM | 🌍global | $1.99/GPU/hr | |||
![]() Hot Aisle | AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB VRAM | 192GB | 8 vCPU 224GB RAM 12288GB Storage | Michigan | $1.99/GPU/hr | Available | ||
Cirrascale | 8×AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB VRAM | 192GB | 192 vCPU 2355GB RAM 44538GB Storage | United States | $3.08/GPU/hr $24.64/hr total (8×) | |||
![]() Crusoe | AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB VRAM | 192GB | 0 vCPU 0GB RAM | United States | $3.45/GPU/hr | |||
Cirrascale | 8×AMD Instinct MI300X 192GB VRAM | 192GB | 192 vCPU 2355GB RAM 44538GB Storage | United States | $3.47/GPU/hr $27.76/hr total (8×) |
When to Choose the A100 PCIe 80GB
The A100 PCIe 80GB excels in environments reliant on NVIDIA's mature CUDA ecosystem and NVLink interconnects for multi-GPU scaling. Its PCIe 4.0 form factor integrates seamlessly into existing data centers, and 28 cloud offers provide greater availability than MI300X's 9.
Lower TDP of 400W simplifies cooling and power provisioning versus MI300X's 750W, making A100 preferable for constrained facilities. Average pricing of $2.08 per hour offers cost stability for production inference where ecosystem lock-in prioritizes reliability over peak specs.
When to Choose the MI300X
The MI300X stands out for memory-bound workloads: 192 GB HBM3 handles models exceeding 80 GB, enabling full-precision loading without sharding. Its 5300 GB/s bandwidth supports massive batch sizes in training, cutting time to convergence.
High compute delivers value in FP16-heavy tasks, with 1307 TFLOPS driving rapid LLM development. Despite higher average pricing of $2.63 per hour, performance gains justify selection for cutting-edge AI research on PCIe 5.0 or Infinity Fabric clusters.
Use Cases
MI300X's 1307 TFLOPS FP16 and 163 TFLOPS FP32, combined with 192 GB VRAM, enable training of massive models at larger batch sizes than A100's 312 TFLOPS FP16 and 80 GB.
FP8 performance of 2614 TFLOPS and 5300 GB/s bandwidth on MI300X support high-throughput quantized serving, surpassing A100's capabilities for large-scale deployments.
The 192 GB HBM3 VRAM on MI300X accommodates full model loading for efficient fine-tuning, while 1307 TFLOPS FP16 accelerates iterations beyond A100's 80 GB limit.
A100's 312 TFLOPS FP16 suffices for standard image generation pipelines, but MI300X's higher specs enable larger batches and faster rendering on complex scenes.
MI300X's 163 TFLOPS FP32 outperforms A100's 19.5 TFLOPS, providing speedup in simulations requiring high precision and 5300 GB/s bandwidth for data-intensive computations.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which GPU has more VRAM?▾
The MI300X offers 192 GB HBM3 VRAM, exceeding the A100 PCIe 80GB's 80 GB HBM2e. This difference allows MI300X to handle larger models without partitioning. A100 remains viable for workloads fitting within 80 GB.
How do FP16 performance levels compare?▾
MI300X achieves 1307 TFLOPS FP16, over four times the A100's 312 TFLOPS. This gap accelerates AI training significantly on MI300X. Inference also benefits from the higher throughput.
What are the current cloud prices?▾
A100 PCIe 80GB starts at $0.89 per hour, averaging $2.08 per hour across 28 offers. MI300X begins at $0.50 per hour, averaging $2.63 per hour across 9 offers. Availability favors A100.
Which has higher memory bandwidth?▾
MI300X provides 5300 GB/s, more than double A100's 2039 GB/s. Higher bandwidth reduces bottlenecks in data-heavy tasks. This impacts batch sizes and training speed.
What is the power consumption difference?▾
A100 has a 400W TDP, lower than MI300X's 750W. A100 suits power-limited setups. MI300X requires advanced cooling for its performance.
Which architecture is newer?▾
MI300X uses CDNA 3 from 2023, newer than A100's Ampere from 2020. This brings optimizations like FP8 support at 2614 TFLOPS. A100 benefits from broader software maturity.
Which is cheaper to rent, the A100 or the MI300X?▾
Cloud rental prices for both the A100 and MI300X vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.
How much VRAM does the A100 have compared to the MI300X?▾
The A100 has 40 to 80 GB of HBM2e memory. The MI300X has 192 GB of HBM3 memory.
Can I find A100 and MI300X GPUs available to rent right now?▾
Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.
What is the main difference between the A100 and the MI300X?▾
The A100 uses the Ampere architecture (2020) while the MI300X uses CDNA 3 (2023). The MI300X delivers 4.2x the FP16 throughput and 2.6x the memory bandwidth of the A100.





