Specifications Compared
| Spec | A100 | RTX-4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 400W | 200W |
| VRAM | 40-80 GB | 12 GB |
| CUDA Cores | 6,912 | 5,888 |
| Memory Type | HBM2e | GDDR6X |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Form Factors | SXM4, PCIe | PCIe |
| Interconnect | NVLink, PCIe 4.0, InfiniBand | |
| Tensor Cores | 432 | 184 |
| FP16 Performance | 312 TFLOPS | 29.1 TFLOPS |
| FP32 Performance | 19.5 TFLOPS | 29.1 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 9.7 TFLOPS | |
| INT8 Performance | 624 TOPS | 466 TOPS |
| Memory Bandwidth | 2,039 GB/s | 504 GB/s |
Performance Analysis
The A100 PCIe 40GB dominates in FP16 at 312 TFLOPS, ideal for accelerating AI training where half-precision computations speed up matrix operations by up to 16 times over FP32: its 19.5 TFLOPS FP32 suits mixed-precision workflows. The RTX 4070 matches 29.1 TFLOPS across FP16 and FP32, providing balanced performance for inference tasks but lacking the A100's raw throughput for large-scale training.
Memory bandwidth reveals key limits: A100's 2039 GB/s supports massive batch sizes in deep learning, enabling models with billions of parameters without swapping to host RAM, while RTX 4070's 504 GB/s constrains batches to smaller sizes and reduces efficiency in memory-bound scenarios. In real-world terms, A100 handles 40 GB VRAM for enterprise inference on large language models, whereas RTX 4070's 12 GB suits lightweight deployments. Power draw impacts cloud costs too: A100's 400W demands more infrastructure than RTX 4070's 200W.
Live Cloud Pricing
Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.
A100 PCIe 40GB
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Vast.ai | NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 256 vCPU 63GB RAM 2826GB Storage | Slovenia | $0.73/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Vast.ai | 2×NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 256 vCPU 126GB RAM 794GB Storage | Slovenia | $0.73/GPU/hr $1.47/hr total (2×) | Available | ||
![]() LeaderGPU | 8×NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 64 vCPU 384GB RAM 2000GB Storage | Netherlands | $0.90/GPU/hr $7.20/hr total (8×) | Available | ||
![]() Vast.ai | NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 64 vCPU 63GB RAM 646GB Storage | Czechia | $1.07/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Denvr | 8×NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 128 vCPU 1024GB RAM 15200GB Storage | Virginia | $1.15/GPU/hr $9.20/hr total (8×) |
RTX 4070
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() RunPod | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB VRAM | 12GB | 6 vCPU 30GB RAM | 🌍global | $0.50/GPU/hr |
When to Choose the A100 PCIe 40GB
The NVIDIA A100 PCIe 40GB excels in large-scale AI training and scientific simulations requiring over 40 GB VRAM: its 312 TFLOPS FP16 and 2039 GB/s bandwidth process massive datasets efficiently. Multi-GPU setups benefit from NVLink and InfiniBand, scaling performance across nodes unavailable on RTX 4070.
When to Choose the RTX 4070
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 fits budget-conscious inference and gaming in the cloud: at $0.07 per hour, its 29.1 TFLOPS FP32 handles real-time tasks with 12 GB VRAM. Lower 200W TDP reduces operational costs for smaller models or prototyping where 504 GB/s bandwidth suffices.
Use Cases
A100's 40 GB HBM2e VRAM and 312 TFLOPS FP16 support training massive LLMs with large batch sizes. RTX 4070's 12 GB limits model scale.
A100 handles high-concurrency inference on large models via 2039 GB/s bandwidth. RTX 4070 suits small models but bottlenecks at scale.
A100 accelerates with 312 TFLOPS FP16 for big datasets; RTX 4070's 29.1 TFLOPS FP32 works for smaller fine-tunes at lower cost.
RTX 4070's Ada architecture and 29.1 TFLOPS deliver fast image generation on 12 GB VRAM. A100 overkill for consumer diffusion tasks.
A100's 40 GB VRAM and NVLink enable complex simulations; 2039 GB/s bandwidth outperforms RTX 4070's 504 GB/s.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which GPU has higher FP16 performance?▾
The A100 PCIe 40GB achieves 312 TFLOPS FP16, over 10 times the RTX 4070's 29.1 TFLOPS. This gap favors A100 for AI training acceleration.
What is the VRAM difference between A100 and RTX 4070?▾
A100 offers 40 GB HBM2e versus RTX 4070's 12 GB GDDR6X. Larger VRAM on A100 supports bigger models without offloading.
How do cloud prices compare?▾
A100 PCIe 40GB starts at $0.60 per hour (average $1.85) across 11 offers; RTX 4070 at $0.07 per hour (average $0.14) across 2. RTX 4070 wins on cost.
Which has better memory bandwidth?▾
A100 provides 2039 GB/s, four times RTX 4070's 504 GB/s. Higher bandwidth on A100 boosts data-heavy workloads.
Is RTX 4070 newer than A100?▾
RTX 4070 uses 2023 Ada Lovelace architecture; A100 is 2020 Ampere. Newer design gives RTX 4070 balanced FP32 at 29.1 TFLOPS.
What are the TDP ratings?▾
A100 draws 400W; RTX 4070 uses 200W. Lower TDP on RTX 4070 lowers cloud power costs.
Which is cheaper to rent, the A100 or the RTX 4070?▾
Cloud rental prices for both the A100 and RTX 4070 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.
How much VRAM does the A100 have compared to the RTX 4070?▾
The A100 has 40 to 80 GB of HBM2e memory. The RTX 4070 has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory.
Can I find A100 and RTX 4070 GPUs available to rent right now?▾
Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.
What is the main difference between the A100 and the RTX 4070?▾
The A100 uses the Ampere architecture (2020) while the RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace (2023). The A100 delivers 10.7x the FP16 throughput and 4.0x the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4070.



