Specifications Compared
| Spec | A100 | RTX-2070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 400W | 175W |
| VRAM | 40-80 GB | 8 GB |
| CUDA Cores | 6,912 | 2,304 |
| Memory Type | HBM2e | GDDR6 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Form Factors | SXM4, PCIe | PCIe |
| Interconnect | NVLink, PCIe 4.0, InfiniBand | NVLink |
| Tensor Cores | 432 | 288 |
| FP16 Performance | 312 TFLOPS | 7.5 TFLOPS |
| FP32 Performance | 19.5 TFLOPS | 7.5 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 9.7 TFLOPS | |
| INT8 Performance | 624 TOPS | |
| Memory Bandwidth | 2,039 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Performance Analysis
The A100 PCIe 40GB vastly outpaces the RTX 2070 in compute performance: its 312 TFLOPS FP16 rating supports accelerated AI training, where the RTX 2070 manages only 7.5 TFLOPS. This FP16 advantage means the A100 processes tensor operations 41 times faster, critical for deep learning models requiring half-precision arithmetic. FP32 performance follows suit at 19.5 TFLOPS for the A100 versus 7.5 TFLOPS for the RTX 2070, benefiting general-purpose computing tasks.
Memory specifications amplify these gains. The A100's 40 GB HBM2e VRAM and 2039 GB/s bandwidth allow massive batch sizes in training, preventing out-of-memory errors common with the RTX 2070's 8 GB GDDR6 and 448 GB/s. Larger batches reduce training time per epoch. For inference, high bandwidth ensures low latency on large models, while the RTX 2070 limits deployments to smaller inputs. Power draw underscores efficiency differences: 400W TDP for the A100 versus 175W for the RTX 2070.
Live Cloud Pricing
Real-time prices from 25+ providers. Updated every 60 seconds.
A100 PCIe 40GB
| Provider | GPU Model | VRAM | Host Specs | Region | Price | Status | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Vast.ai | NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 256 vCPU 63GB RAM 2826GB Storage | Slovenia | $0.73/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Vast.ai | 2×NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 256 vCPU 126GB RAM 794GB Storage | Slovenia | $0.73/GPU/hr $1.47/hr total (2×) | Available | ||
![]() LeaderGPU | 8×NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 64 vCPU 384GB RAM 2000GB Storage | Netherlands | $0.90/GPU/hr $7.20/hr total (8×) | Available | ||
![]() Vast.ai | NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 64 vCPU 63GB RAM 557GB Storage | Czechia | $1.00/GPU/hr | Available | ||
![]() Denvr | 8×NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80GB 80GB VRAM | 80GB | 128 vCPU 1024GB RAM 15200GB Storage | Virginia | $1.15/GPU/hr $9.20/hr total (8×) |
When to Choose the A100 PCIe 40GB
The A100 PCIe 40GB excels in professional AI workflows. Its 40 GB VRAM handles large language models during training, where the RTX 2070's 8 GB fails. With 312 TFLOPS FP16, it accelerates multi-GPU setups via NVLink and PCIe 4.0, ideal for data centers scaling to thousands of GPUs.
When to Choose the RTX 2070
The RTX 2070 fits budget-conscious users for light tasks. At $0.02 per hour average, it runs inference on small models within its 8 GB VRAM and 7.5 TFLOPS FP16. Gaming or Stable Diffusion at 1080p resolution leverages its PCIe form factor without the A100's 400W demands.
Use Cases
The A100's 40 GB VRAM and 312 TFLOPS FP16 support large batch sizes for billion-parameter models, impossible on the RTX 2070's 8 GB limit.
High 2039 GB/s bandwidth ensures low-latency serving of large models; RTX 2070's 448 GB/s restricts to smaller deployments.
19.5 TFLOPS FP32 and ample VRAM handle parameter-efficient tuning on datasets exceeding RTX 2070 capacities.
RTX 2070's 8 GB suffices for 512x512 generations at 7.5 TFLOPS; A100 overkill unless scaling to high resolutions.
A100's 312 TFLOPS FP16 accelerates simulations; RTX 2070's lower specs limit complex HPC workloads.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the VRAM difference between A100 PCIe 40GB and RTX 2070?▾
The A100 PCIe 40GB has 40 GB HBM2e VRAM, five times the RTX 2070's 8 GB GDDR6. This enables larger models on the A100.
How do FP16 performances compare?▾
A100 achieves 312 TFLOPS FP16, 41 times the RTX 2070's 7.5 TFLOPS. Training speeds improve dramatically with the A100.
What are the cloud pricing ranges?▾
A100 PCIe 40GB starts at $0.60 per hour, averaging $1.85 across 11 offers. RTX 2070 starts at $0.02 per hour, averaging $0.04 across 2 offers.
Which has higher memory bandwidth?▾
A100 offers 2039 GB/s, over four times the RTX 2070's 448 GB/s. Batch processing benefits most from this gap.
What are the TDPs?▾
A100 draws 400W, suited for datacenters. RTX 2070 uses 175W, better for low-power consumer setups.
When was each architecture released?▾
Ampere for A100 launched in 2020. Turing for RTX 2070 came in 2018. A100 benefits from two years of advancements.
Which is cheaper to rent, the A100 or the RTX 2070?▾
Cloud rental prices for both the A100 and RTX 2070 vary by provider, configuration, and availability. This page shows live pricing from 25+ providers updated every 60 seconds. Scroll to the Live Cloud Pricing section to compare current rates.
How much VRAM does the A100 have compared to the RTX 2070?▾
The A100 has 40 to 80 GB of HBM2e memory. The RTX 2070 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.
Can I find A100 and RTX 2070 GPUs available to rent right now?▾
Yes. This page shows real-time availability across 25+ cloud GPU providers. The Live Cloud Pricing section displays only in-stock offers with current pricing.
What is the main difference between the A100 and the RTX 2070?▾
The A100 uses the Ampere architecture (2020) while the RTX 2070 uses Turing (2018). The A100 delivers 41.6x the FP16 throughput and 4.6x the memory bandwidth of the RTX 2070.


